Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← HookedPad12 decisions on this page

Audit log

Every state-changing event for HookedPad: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.

  1. #1reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-10-26 18:37:07Z
    Score: 32 → 32 (no score change)
    Platform mechanics, fee split, dates, absence of a team and audit, upgrade authority and the Oct 5 and Oct 15 market figures all match the cited Bittime and Bitrue articles. The KOL net-seller statement conflicts with the current MadeOnSol page, which shows net buying. The page omits the roughly 85% price drop since early October. No shutdown, exploit or sanction was found. The DropsTab, Blockspot and Solana Compass figures and the DexTools audit fields were not checked.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 461,768,344
    sig
    BMbzw84mLhPB…gVgK4dLxexplorer ↗
    hash
    FunRr39PXHKE…oW6woG7Dsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1322 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"6f58ad36a9c5ebea6cc605bd39881c29","decided_at":"2026-10-26T18:37:07.092Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.25,"findings_hash":"7KGZz3bExYBn2dTTBuT7dexyxJPN89xoL3DoMdWXPo76","investigation_id":"90f8a94c-c24b-4345-9af5-b70ca3fd82f0","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":32,"omissions":{"material":1,"total":2},"page_content_hash":"090acd9a71dc43898e317f2494e6b7260b09cd589fe4d2ed3a07cad476a12a5c","page_slug":"hookedpad","prev_score":32,"reason":"Platform mechanics, fee split, dates, absence of a team and audit, upgrade authority and the Oct 5 and Oct 15 market figures all match the cited Bittime and Bitrue articles. The KOL net-seller statement conflicts with the current MadeOnSol page, which shows net buying. The page omits the roughly 85% price drop since early October. No shutdown, exploit or sanction was found. The DropsTab, Blockspot and Solana Compass figures and the DexTools audit fields were not checked.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":1,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 357ee345-ea12-48a1-a9d2-c60398b203b8
  2. #2review reviseby judgejudge
    2026-10-26 18:37:07Z
    Score: 32 → 22 (-10)
    Of 8 checked claims, 1 was disputed and 1 could not be verified, giving 25% (2 of 8), which falls in the minor-issues band. claim_findings[5] says tracked KOL wallets were net sellers of HOOKED, but the cited MadeOnSol page now shows net buying, so the statement is stale or incorrect. claim_findings[7] (aggregator price ranges) was not checked. The page also omits that the token has since fallen about 85% to roughly $996K market cap. The platform mechanics, fee split, absence of team and audit, and upgrade authority all match the cited sources, and no shutdown or exploit was found.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 461,768,349
    sig
    48TuuUP1FsUK…G59YsprKexplorer ↗
    hash
    FNBqCQdR51t8…4pAu6uXEsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1757 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"6f58ad36a9c5ebea6cc605bd39881c29","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-10-26T18:37:07.092Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.25,"investigation_id":"90f8a94c-c24b-4345-9af5-b70ca3fd82f0","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":22,"page_slug":"hookedpad","prev_score":32,"reason":"Of 8 checked claims, 1 was disputed and 1 could not be verified, giving 25% (2 of 8), which falls in the minor-issues band. claim_findings[5] says tracked KOL wallets were net sellers of HOOKED, but the cited MadeOnSol page now shows net buying, so the statement is stale or incorrect. claim_findings[7] (aggregator price ranges) was not checked. The page also omits that the token has since fallen about 85% to roughly $996K market cap. The platform mechanics, fee split, absence of team and audit, and upgrade authority all match the cited sources, and no shutdown or exploit was found.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":-10,"score_limit":{"applied":-10,"limited":true,"proposed":-12,"rule":"second_opinion_agreed","second":-10},"sequence_num":2,"severity_override":{"applied":false,"band":null,"from_band":"minor","reason":"The material omission (roughly 85% price drop since the Oct 5 snapshot) is a time-sensitive market update, not a shutdown, exploit or sanction; subject_status.contradicts_page is false, and the page already warns of large, inconsistent price swings. It is handled by a penalty in the upper part of the minor band rather than a harsher band."},"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision c165c8c3-e62c-4daf-9024-a417fc691147
  3. #3reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-10-27 10:42:49Z
    Score: 22 → 22 (no score change)
    The core claims about platform mechanics, the Sept 28 announcement, the early-October Bittime/GMGN figures and the MadeOnSol safety and KOL data match the sources. The token has declined about 87% as stated. Small drift exists in the live price ($0.00112 versus $0.00104 on the page). The internal review note in the timeline is not an entity fact and is unsourced. No shutdown, exploit or sanction was found.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 462,040,835
    sig
    cMDraN5joroA…JecYLGVFexplorer ↗
    hash
    Gj4DUY81BtDX…KBBY8dHYsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1255 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"6d41182b89d0dc3d83ed79ec4a127c18","decided_at":"2026-10-27T10:42:49.018Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.1,"findings_hash":"F1Yz2NWYwPwqM8JVqC2UjFxF8hEKrdZSxKPHhWLC1W5H","investigation_id":"90f8a94c-c24b-4345-9af5-b70ca3fd82f0","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":22,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"cdc36094add67a718ab12ab8fc4059a1f9e3b20632740a9cb3118eb3891ad2eb","page_slug":"hookedpad","prev_score":22,"reason":"The core claims about platform mechanics, the Sept 28 announcement, the early-October Bittime/GMGN figures and the MadeOnSol safety and KOL data match the sources. The token has declined about 87% as stated. Small drift exists in the live price ($0.00112 versus $0.00104 on the page). The internal review note in the timeline is not an entity fact and is unsourced. No shutdown, exploit or sanction was found.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 4c8523cb-877f-45f3-9e9c-27f551084f5b
  4. #4review reviseby judgejudge
    2026-10-27 10:42:49Z
    Score: 22 → 17 (-5)
    Of 10 claim findings, 8 were confirmed, 1 was partially supported (live tracker price drifted slightly, the roughly 85-90% decline still holds), and 1 could not be verified: claim_findings[7], an internal review note placed in the timeline that is not a fact about the entity and cites an unrelated source. That puts the unverified share at exactly 10%, the edge of the approve band. The review also lists a high-priority coverage gap (coverage_gaps[0]: upgrade authority of the launchpad and hook programs and holder distribution were not checked on-chain), so the page is revised rather than approved. No shutdown, exploit or sanction was found, and the only omission (the site's inconsistency about devnet versus mainnet testing) is minor.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 462,040,840
    sig
    447Hhket9gWR…hHJTh4APexplorer ↗
    hash
    6NsqgvqeJipi…b9rZ7wbMsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1383 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"6d41182b89d0dc3d83ed79ec4a127c18","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T10:42:49.018Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.1,"investigation_id":"90f8a94c-c24b-4345-9af5-b70ca3fd82f0","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":17,"page_slug":"hookedpad","prev_score":22,"reason":"Of 10 claim findings, 8 were confirmed, 1 was partially supported (live tracker price drifted slightly, the roughly 85-90% decline still holds), and 1 could not be verified: claim_findings[7], an internal review note placed in the timeline that is not a fact about the entity and cites an unrelated source. That puts the unverified share at exactly 10%, the edge of the approve band. The review also lists a high-priority coverage gap (coverage_gaps[0]: upgrade authority of the launchpad and hook programs and holder distribution were not checked on-chain), so the page is revised rather than approved. No shutdown, exploit or sanction was found, and the only omission (the site's inconsistency about devnet versus mainnet testing) is minor.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":-5,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision c47762bf-18d2-41b2-b844-fdd44f487601
  5. #5reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-11-01 13:26:35Z
    Score: 17 → 17 (no score change)
    Most claims on mechanics, launch date, early-October market figures and mint/freeze status check out against the official site, Bittime and MadeOnSol. Two items drifted: the site's rule counts are now 55/34, and the MadeOnSol KOL flow section now shows the opposite of the page (net distribution, -209 SOL). The page's own framing that the tracker is live partly mitigates this. No shutdown or exploit was found.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 464,108,445
    sig
    3dfphxAJZFww…ntNJdXpUexplorer ↗
    hash
    83xqKKPx2SCx…Cf4RSYm5sha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1261 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"a67d8bd7bbb73c236cac6934c2fe1ebb","decided_at":"2026-11-01T13:26:35.547Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.1818,"findings_hash":"GFURJLPvfmgpZFPPLhJqRGNBSn4rb2kiNLV7iBuYWKxN","investigation_id":"90f8a94c-c24b-4345-9af5-b70ca3fd82f0","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":17,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"cdc36094add67a718ab12ab8fc4059a1f9e3b20632740a9cb3118eb3891ad2eb","page_slug":"hookedpad","prev_score":17,"reason":"Most claims on mechanics, launch date, early-October market figures and mint/freeze status check out against the official site, Bittime and MadeOnSol. Two items drifted: the site's rule counts are now 55/34, and the MadeOnSol KOL flow section now shows the opposite of the page (net distribution, -209 SOL). The page's own framing that the tracker is live partly mitigates this. No shutdown or exploit was found.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":5,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 1a31d2f8-d245-4b0d-b405-47a9c52c47a5
  6. #6review reviseby judgejudge
    2026-11-01 13:26:35Z
    Score: 17 → 9 (-8)
    Two of 11 claims (about 18%) were disputed: claim_findings[7] and [8] say the MadeOnSol tracker showed net buying by tracked wallets, but the live tracker now shows net selling (about -209 SOL), which also reverses the page's statement that the net-seller reading is no longer supported. claim_findings[0] is stale, because the official site now reports 55 rules across 34 hook programs rather than 54 and 33. These are time-sensitive drifts from live sources that were probably accurate when captured, and the core claims (no named team, no audit, price decline, mint and freeze revoked, no incident found) were confirmed. The project is still operating, the one omission (unlocked liquidity and continued decline) is minor, and reviewer confidence is moderate, so the penalty is kept at the low end of the minor band.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 464,108,450
    sig
    26zv7ExeHxCt…JwaBNhT2explorer ↗
    hash
    2SC51oe8oD2G…9L7JhcH4sha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1462 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"a67d8bd7bbb73c236cac6934c2fe1ebb","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T13:26:35.547Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.1818,"investigation_id":"90f8a94c-c24b-4345-9af5-b70ca3fd82f0","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":9,"page_slug":"hookedpad","prev_score":17,"reason":"Two of 11 claims (about 18%) were disputed: claim_findings[7] and [8] say the MadeOnSol tracker showed net buying by tracked wallets, but the live tracker now shows net selling (about -209 SOL), which also reverses the page's statement that the net-seller reading is no longer supported. claim_findings[0] is stale, because the official site now reports 55 rules across 34 hook programs rather than 54 and 33. These are time-sensitive drifts from live sources that were probably accurate when captured, and the core claims (no named team, no audit, price decline, mint and freeze revoked, no incident found) were confirmed. The project is still operating, the one omission (unlocked liquidity and continued decline) is minor, and reviewer confidence is moderate, so the penalty is kept at the low end of the minor band.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":-8,"sequence_num":6,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision c7605d67-3b01-4642-be8c-8695ec01667e
  7. #7reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-11-01 13:41:31Z
    Score: 9 → 9 (no score change)
    Core platform mechanics, launch date, fee split and the absence of a named team or audit are supported. Live-tracker figures have drifted: the 54/33 rule counts and the $954K market cap are stale. The KOL-flow section is now contradicted, since MadeOnSol shows net distributing, not accumulating. The Blockspot, DropsTab and Forklog sources were not re-fetched. A page note about the prior review failing is internal and should not be public.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 464,112,698
    sig
    YKri8LgN6SEU…E5D2Jj77explorer ↗
    hash
    5kWDwdXy5Pbv…sKZQQRjNsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1289 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"beae6bc252c51f2c3c835e985260eef8","decided_at":"2026-11-01T13:41:31.737Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2727,"findings_hash":"DkyULdcs3d5bNhqxY1hwtU79MtRvsFZuhpsYZpnjmuoV","investigation_id":"90f8a94c-c24b-4345-9af5-b70ca3fd82f0","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":9,"omissions":{"material":1,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"cdc36094add67a718ab12ab8fc4059a1f9e3b20632740a9cb3118eb3891ad2eb","page_slug":"hookedpad","prev_score":9,"reason":"Core platform mechanics, launch date, fee split and the absence of a named team or audit are supported. Live-tracker figures have drifted: the 54/33 rule counts and the $954K market cap are stale. The KOL-flow section is now contradicted, since MadeOnSol shows net distributing, not accumulating. The Blockspot, DropsTab and Forklog sources were not re-fetched. A page note about the prior review failing is internal and should not be public.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":7,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 54d85283-5656-4221-adec-dd10034cfb63
  8. #8review reviseby judgejudge
    2026-11-01 13:41:31Z
    Score: 9 → 0 (-20)
    Of 10 checked claims, 2 were disputed and 1 could not be verified, which is 30%. The disputed claims (claim_findings[6] and [7]) are in the wallet-flow section: it says tracked wallets were net accumulating and that the net-seller claim is no longer supported, but the live tracker now shows net distributing. The page also omits a material risk reported by Bittime, that the deploy wallet can still upgrade the hook program and some rules can restrict selling. The rule counts and market cap figures are out of date but the overall decline narrative holds, the fee mechanics, launch date and absence of a named team were confirmed, and no shutdown or exploit was found. The reviewer's confidence was moderate (0.6), so the penalty sits in the lower-middle of the band and the page is not delisted.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 464,112,703
    sig
    3qM12oHSv2fo…D99JzpZvexplorer ↗
    hash
    ELB4ifVddBST…Q1nNmkKFsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1915 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"beae6bc252c51f2c3c835e985260eef8","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T13:41:31.737Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.2727,"investigation_id":"90f8a94c-c24b-4345-9af5-b70ca3fd82f0","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"page_slug":"hookedpad","prev_score":9,"reason":"Of 10 checked claims, 2 were disputed and 1 could not be verified, which is 30%. The disputed claims (claim_findings[6] and [7]) are in the wallet-flow section: it says tracked wallets were net accumulating and that the net-seller claim is no longer supported, but the live tracker now shows net distributing. The page also omits a material risk reported by Bittime, that the deploy wallet can still upgrade the hook program and some rules can restrict selling. The rule counts and market cap figures are out of date but the overall decline narrative holds, the fee mechanics, launch date and absence of a named team were confirmed, and no shutdown or exploit was found. The reviewer's confidence was moderate (0.6), so the penalty sits in the lower-middle of the band and the page is not delisted.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":-20,"sequence_num":8,"severity_override":{"applied":true,"band":"significant","from_band":"minor","reason":"disputed_pct is 30% (2 disputed + 1 unverifiable of 10), on the line between minor and significant. omission_findings[0] is material: the deploy wallet can still upgrade the hook program and some rules can restrict selling, and the page says neither. The coverage gap on upgrade authority and holder concentration is high priority. Together these put the page in the significant band."},"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 66ce5f36-c8c9-42e6-8293-8492108e1371
  9. #9reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-11-01 21:35:48Z
    Score: 0 → 0 (no score change)
    All checked claims match the cited sources, and the page hedges attribution and point-in-time data appropriately. Sourcing is thin and nearly all single-source Tier 3. No shutdown or exploit found.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 464,245,567
    sig
    3YNRLWDjDZ8x…iAHZX1Rmexplorer ↗
    hash
    6VNmPeaRagwH…kniVSeDCsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1006 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"ad5524ba70735c8e248d6960ff3607cd","decided_at":"2026-11-01T21:35:48.753Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.125,"findings_hash":"7dpXaNJTyM66noWTv6GaZ7jPjNWEnefWyKFeMyAuGmsW","investigation_id":"90f8a94c-c24b-4345-9af5-b70ca3fd82f0","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"page_content_hash":"cf70eaef905b6ec4ea2f239eb4235d52dd85e6f08bc7250d960c6529e2a497eb","page_slug":"hookedpad","prev_score":0,"reason":"All checked claims match the cited sources, and the page hedges attribution and point-in-time data appropriately. Sourcing is thin and nearly all single-source Tier 3. No shutdown or exploit found.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":9,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision a51f8761-582e-41d7-a888-f41a723caf91
  10. #10review reviseby judgejudge
    2026-11-01 21:35:48Z
    Score: 0 → 0 (-5)
    Seven of the eight checked claims match their cited sources (claim_findings[0] to [6]). One claim, that other tokens such as Hooked Protocol share the HOOKED name (claim_findings[7]), could not be verified against a fetched source, which puts 1 of 8 findings (12.5%) in the minor-issues band. That claim is low-stakes and widely known, so the penalty is kept at the lightest end. The review also lists a high-priority coverage gap: upgrade authority, holder concentration and liquidity lock have not been checked on-chain. Most claims rest on a single Tier 3 article. No shutdown, exploit or material omission was found.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 464,245,572
    sig
    4JjhvreS92h7…31YJZypQexplorer ↗
    hash
    Ah5uzycYrqfN…G7d9z4Qnsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1262 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"ad5524ba70735c8e248d6960ff3607cd","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T21:35:48.753Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.125,"investigation_id":"90f8a94c-c24b-4345-9af5-b70ca3fd82f0","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"page_slug":"hookedpad","prev_score":0,"reason":"Seven of the eight checked claims match their cited sources (claim_findings[0] to [6]). One claim, that other tokens such as Hooked Protocol share the HOOKED name (claim_findings[7]), could not be verified against a fetched source, which puts 1 of 8 findings (12.5%) in the minor-issues band. That claim is low-stakes and widely known, so the penalty is kept at the lightest end. The review also lists a high-priority coverage gap: upgrade authority, holder concentration and liquidity lock have not been checked on-chain. Most claims rest on a single Tier 3 article. No shutdown, exploit or material omission was found.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":-5,"sequence_num":10,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision e9ffb16f-0b50-43be-af38-8fa14c901459
  11. #11reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-11-02 20:48:38Z
    Score: 0 → 0 (no score change)
    All claims check out against the cited sources, and the page hedges appropriately, flagging its single-source basis and the unverified on-chain items. The one weak point is the 2022-11-23 Binance announcement date, which the cited Cryptoast article (dated 2022-11-24) does not show. The page is thin, with no on-chain verification. No status contradictions were found.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 464,635,351
    sig
    3aHSJhnrE4o9…u4eyTKquexplorer ↗
    hash
    9TuNMs3fHvp9…EKQBXLeNsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1211 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"1a70453b1548477452298793a89ed860","decided_at":"2026-11-02T20:48:38.759Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0,"findings_hash":"6WVXNQn4Xfd2ebwCMfcJoVa9zgpdYPUtSw11KwrpYn55","investigation_id":"90f8a94c-c24b-4345-9af5-b70ca3fd82f0","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"d9b654059059940b0aafff1a13905ca4a6ac7790096e2f106f3851c5e41f6db9","page_slug":"hookedpad","prev_score":0,"reason":"All claims check out against the cited sources, and the page hedges appropriately, flagging its single-source basis and the unverified on-chain items. The one weak point is the 2022-11-23 Binance announcement date, which the cited Cryptoast article (dated 2022-11-24) does not show. The page is thin, with no on-chain verification. No status contradictions were found.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":11,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision cbc351e6-496c-4c9a-993c-bbefed98e0e6
  12. #12review approveby judgejudge
    2026-11-02 20:48:39Z
    Score: 0 → 0 (no score change)
    Of five claims checked, four were confirmed and one (claim_findings[2]) was partially supported because the cited Cryptoast article is dated 2022-11-24, one day after the stated 2022-11-23 announcement date. None were disputed or unverifiable, so the disputed share is 0%. The only omission (launch date and price volatility) is minor, and no shutdown, exploit or sanction was found. The two high-priority coverage gaps, on-chain checks and team or audit information, are already stated openly on the page, which also labels its single-source, promotional basis, so they call for expansion rather than a penalty.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 464,635,356
    sig
    65jkQ1yx8iD1…rvhkcUZJexplorer ↗
    hash
    GWmZ8JyEwnMx…zGaTRDNesha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1250 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"1a70453b1548477452298793a89ed860","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T20:48:38.759Z","decision":"review_approve","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0,"investigation_id":"90f8a94c-c24b-4345-9af5-b70ca3fd82f0","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"page_slug":"hookedpad","prev_score":0,"reason":"Of five claims checked, four were confirmed and one (claim_findings[2]) was partially supported because the cited Cryptoast article is dated 2022-11-24, one day after the stated 2022-11-23 announcement date. None were disputed or unverifiable, so the disputed share is 0%. The only omission (launch date and price volatility) is minor, and no shutdown, exploit or sanction was found. The two high-priority coverage gaps, on-chain checks and team or audit information, are already stated openly on the page, which also labels its single-source, promotional basis, so they call for expansion rather than a penalty.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":12,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision db02684f-497d-4555-83c8-aab7cd66f5cd
How verification works. The “Row integrity” check above is computed in your browser — your machine recomputes the SHA-256 of the canonical bytes and compares against the stored hash. No avoid.net server can fake that check. The “full verify” link goes one level deeper: your browser fetches the on-chain transaction from a Solana RPC node and confirms the same hash is in the memo. If you don’t want to trust either avoid.net or the public RPC, run the CLI verifier on your own machine — python -m src.verify_decision <event_id>.