Audit log

Every state-changing event for Hefu Chai and Huaisong (Jerry) Xiang: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.

1. #1publishby system:backfill

   2026-09-21 17:09:15Z
   Score: ? → ? (no score change)
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 449,118,355

   sig

   2xuWhoqmgRp7…KwPwjR7Ucopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   3EpTYhHET8pa…dcuGSw8ccopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (20157 B) ▸

   {"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"a4adf77e-73dd-477b-8bf1-3e3e837c1495","kind":"publish","page_slug":"hefu-chai-and-huaisong-jerry-xiang","published_at":"2026-09-21T17:09:15.538Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"Hefu Chai and Huaisong (Jerry) Xiang","sections":[{"content":"On September 15, 2026, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) publicly announced charges against Hefu Chai and Huaisong 'Jerry' Xiang. Each defendant faces one count of commodities fraud in violation of the Commodity Exchange Act, carrying a statutory maximum of 10 years in prison, and one count of wire fraud, carrying a statutory maximum of 20 years in prison. The charges were filed as an indictment in SDNY. Chai, a California resident, was scheduled to be arraigned on September 16, 2026 in the Northern District of California; Xiang, a New Jersey resident, was scheduled for arraignment the same day in SDNY. These are criminal charges representing allegations by the government; no conviction or guilty plea has been entered as of the date of this report.","heading":"Criminal Charges","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"DOJ SDNY Press Release: Two Robinhood Employees Charged With Fraud","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/two-robinhood-employees-charged-fraud"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CoinDesk: Two Robinhood Engineers Charged With Insider Trading Using Hyperliquid Perpetuals","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/business/2026/09/16/two-robinhood-engineers-charged-with-insider-trading-using-hyperliquid-perpetuals"}]},{"content":"Prosecutors allege that both Chai and Xiang held 'Coin Aware Individual' status at Robinhood Crypto, a restricted internal designation granting access to a private Slack channel that disclosed planned cryptocurrency listing dates before public announcement. Robinhood's internal policy reportedly prohibited Coin Aware Individuals from trading the relevant crypto-assets on any platform — including Robinhood itself or external venues — in the period before a listing or delisting announcement and for 24 hours after. According to the indictment, Chai and Xiang allegedly violated this policy by purchasing perpetual futures contracts on Hyperliquid — a decentralized derivatives exchange unaffiliated with Robinhood — linked to the tokens scheduled for listing. The defendants allegedly opened long positions ahead of the public announcement, which typically caused the underlying tokens to appreciate in price, then closed those positions for profit. Prosecutors allege Chai traded ahead of at least 10 listing announcements and Xiang ahead of at least 11. Xiang is alleged to have initiated his first trade in Popcat (POPCAT) perpetuals in March 2025.","heading":"Alleged Scheme: Confidential Listing Channel and Hyperliquid Trading","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"DOJ SDNY Press Release: Two Robinhood Employees Charged With Fraud","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/two-robinhood-employees-charged-fraud"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Disruption Banking: Two Robinhood Engineers Charged With Fraud Over Crypto Listing Trades","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.disruptionbanking.com/2026/09/16/two-robinhood-engineers-charged-with-fraud-over-crypto-listing-trades/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"The Block: DOJ Charges Robinhood Engineers With Front-Running Crypto Listings on Hyperliquid","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.theblock.co/news/regulation/2026-09-15-doj-charges-robinhood-engineers-front-running-crypto-listings-hyperliquid-414865"}]},{"content":"Multiple news outlets, citing court filings, identify a range of cryptocurrency tokens whose perpetual futures contracts Chai and Xiang allegedly traded on Hyperliquid ahead of Robinhood listing announcements. Named tokens include: Cat in a Dogs World (MEW), Moo Deng (MOODENG), Hyperliquid (HYPE), Popcat (POPCAT), Aster (ASTER), Plasma (XPL), Ethena (ENA), and Aerodrome Finance (AERO). These represent the tokens cited across multiple secondary sources; the full list of tokens named in the indictment may be broader. All trading activity is alleged and not adjudicated.","heading":"Tokens Allegedly Traded","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"The Currency Analytics: Former Robinhood Engineers Face 30 Years Over $50K Hyperliquid Insider Trades","type":"news_article","url":"https://thecurrencyanalytics.com/altcoins/former-robinhood-engineers-face-30-years-over-50k-hyperliquid-insider-trades-294031"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Palo Alto Online: Menlo Park Robinhood Engineer Arrested in Crypto Trading Case","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.paloaltoonline.com/courts/2026/09/16/menlo-park-robinhood-engineer-arrested-in-crypto-trading-case/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Blockonomi: DOJ Charges Two Former Robinhood Engineers Over Crypto Listing Trades","type":"news_article","url":"https://blockonomi.com/doj-charges-two-former-robinhood-engineers-over-crypto-listing-trades/"}]},{"content":"The DOJ SDNY press release and the majority of reporting based directly on it state that each defendant allegedly made 'more than $50,000' from the trading scheme. A small number of secondary outlets have cited a combined total of approximately $1.13 million; however, this figure does not appear in the DOJ's own announcement or in the primary sources reviewed, and should be treated as unverified. The discrepancy may reflect the difference between confirmed minimum thresholds stated in the press release and figures cited in the underlying complaint or indictment text, which was not publicly available in full at the time of this report. Users should treat the per-defendant profit as confirmed at 'more than $50,000' and the $1.13 million combined figure as unverified pending review of the full charging document.","heading":"Alleged Profits","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"DOJ SDNY Press Release: Two Robinhood Employees Charged With Fraud","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/two-robinhood-employees-charged-fraud"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CryptoSlate: Robinhood Engineers Face Up to 30 Years Over $50,000 Alleged Hyperliquid Profits","type":"news_article","url":"https://cryptoslate.com/robinhood-engineers-face-up-to-30-years-over-50000-alleged-hyperliquid-profits/"}]},{"content":"Hefu Chai, 36, resided in Menlo Park, California at the time of his arrest. According to reporting by the Palo Alto Online and The Almanac, Chai worked as a technical lead responsible for listing new digital assets at Robinhood from approximately 2021 until May 2026. Prior to Robinhood, Chai reportedly worked as an engineer at Meta from approximately 2015 to 2021. A LinkedIn profile attributed to Chai indicates he began employment at OpenAI in June 2026, after departing Robinhood. Chai was arrested by the FBI near a school in Menlo Park on the morning of September 16, 2026, and was scheduled for arraignment the same day in the Northern District of California. Huaisong 'Jerry' Xiang, 30, resided in Jersey City, New Jersey. Xiang reportedly joined Robinhood as a software engineer on the crypto team in approximately 2024 and remained employed through September 2026. Xiang was scheduled for arraignment on September 16, 2026 in SDNY. All employment history details derive from press reporting and have not been independently verified by court filings reviewed for this report.","heading":"Defendant Backgrounds","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Palo Alto Online: Menlo Park Robinhood Engineer Arrested in Crypto Trading Case","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.paloaltoonline.com/courts/2026/09/16/menlo-park-robinhood-engineer-arrested-in-crypto-trading-case/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"The Almanac: Menlo Park Robinhood Engineer Arrested in Crypto Trading Case","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.almanacnews.com/courts/2026/09/16/menlo-park-robinhood-engineer-arrested-in-crypto-trading-case/"},{"credibility":3,"name":"IQ.wiki: Huaisong Xiang","type":"other","url":"https://iq.wiki/wiki/huaisong-xiang"}]},{"content":"Robinhood Markets, Inc. itself was not charged and has not been accused of wrongdoing. According to multiple reports, Robinhood investigated the trading activity internally, reported it to law enforcement and regulators, and cooperated with the government investigation. Prosecutors credited the company for its cooperation. Robinhood issued a public statement asserting it has 'no tolerance for insider trading' and that it maintains 'robust insider trading policies and procedures in place, including for new crypto listings.' Robinhood stock (HOOD) fell approximately 5% in the days following the announcement of the charges, according to Forbes reporting. Hyperliquid, the decentralized derivatives exchange on which the alleged trades occurred, was also not charged and faced no regulatory action in connection with this case.","heading":"Robinhood Corporate Response and Cooperation","severity":"low","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Disruption Banking: Two Robinhood Engineers Charged With Fraud Over Crypto Listing Trades","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.disruptionbanking.com/2026/09/16/two-robinhood-engineers-charged-with-fraud-over-crypto-listing-trades/"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Forbes: Robinhood Stock Tumbles 5% After 2 Ex-Employees Charged With Crypto Trading Fraud","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2026/09/16/robinhood-stock-tumbles-5-after-2-employees-charged-with-crypto-trading-fraud/"}]},{"content":"Reporting indicates the FBI and DOJ investigation relied on multiple data streams: internal records and documents provided by Robinhood, interviews with Robinhood staff and other law enforcement personnel, publicly accessible transaction data on Hyperliquid, and records obtained from cryptocurrency companies. Investigators are reported to have cross-referenced timestamps of employees' access to the confidential Slack channel with fund transfers to associated blockchain wallets and subsequent Hyperliquid trading activity. Because Hyperliquid is a decentralized exchange, its on-chain transaction records are publicly accessible; pseudonymous wallet addresses were linked to real identities through centralized exchange KYC records where the defendants reportedly deposited or transferred funds. On-chain researchers had separately flagged suspicious wallet clusters that repeatedly opened long perpetual positions ahead of Robinhood listing announcements prior to the DOJ investigation becoming public.","heading":"Investigation Methodology","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"TechFlow Post: DOJ and FBI Traced Robinhood Insider Trading Back Through Hyperliquid","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.techflowpost.com/en-US/article/34128"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CryptoTimes: Two Robinhood Engineers Charged With Insider Trading on Hyperliquid","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.cryptotimes.io/2026/09/15/two-robinhood-engineers-charged-with-insider-trading-on-hyperliquid/"}]},{"content":"The case is broadly characterized in legal and crypto press as the first criminal prosecution applying commodities fraud and wire fraud theories to front-running conducted on a decentralized derivatives venue using misappropriated corporate insider information. Prosecutors argued that trading on a decentralized platform does not insulate participants from federal fraud law when the underlying conduct involves misappropriation of confidential corporate information. U.S. Attorney Jamie McDonald stated that 'corporate insiders cannot circumvent securities and commodities laws using derivatives like perpetual futures.' The case arose on the same day — September 15, 2026 — that the U.S. Senate failed to advance H.R. 3633, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, by one vote, illustrating that enforcement agencies are applying existing statutory frameworks rather than waiting for crypto-specific legislation. The charges rely on the Commodity Exchange Act's commodities fraud provision rather than securities fraud statutes, reflecting the DOJ's classification of the relevant perpetual futures as commodities instruments.","heading":"Legal Significance and Regulatory Context","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"TechFlow Post: The CLARITY Act Failed to Pass, but the DOJ and FBI Traced Robinhood Insider Trading Back Through Hyperliquid","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.techflowpost.com/en-US/article/34128"},{"credibility":2,"name":"The Block: DOJ Charges Robinhood Engineers With Front-Running Crypto Listings on Hyperliquid","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.theblock.co/news/regulation/2026-09-15-doj-charges-robinhood-engineers-front-running-crypto-listings-hyperliquid-414865"},{"credibility":1,"name":"DOJ SDNY Press Release: Two Robinhood Employees Charged With Fraud","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/two-robinhood-employees-charged-fraud"}]}],"sources_used":[{"credibility":1,"name":"DOJ SDNY Press Release: Two Robinhood Employees Charged With Fraud","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/two-robinhood-employees-charged-fraud"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CoinDesk: Two Robinhood Engineers Charged With Insider Trading Using Hyperliquid Perpetuals","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/business/2026/09/16/two-robinhood-engineers-charged-with-insider-trading-using-hyperliquid-perpetuals"},{"credibility":2,"name":"The Block: DOJ Charges Robinhood Engineers With Front-Running Crypto Listings on Hyperliquid","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.theblock.co/news/regulation/2026-09-15-doj-charges-robinhood-engineers-front-running-crypto-listings-hyperliquid-414865"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Forbes: Robinhood Stock Tumbles 5% After 2 Ex-Employees Charged With Crypto Trading Fraud","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2026/09/16/robinhood-stock-tumbles-5-after-2-employees-charged-with-crypto-trading-fraud/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Palo Alto Online: Menlo Park Robinhood Engineer Arrested in Crypto Trading Case","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.paloaltoonline.com/courts/2026/09/16/menlo-park-robinhood-engineer-arrested-in-crypto-trading-case/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"The Almanac: Menlo Park Robinhood Engineer Arrested in Crypto Trading Case","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.almanacnews.com/courts/2026/09/16/menlo-park-robinhood-engineer-arrested-in-crypto-trading-case/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Disruption Banking: Two Robinhood Engineers Charged With Fraud Over Crypto Listing Trades","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.disruptionbanking.com/2026/09/16/two-robinhood-engineers-charged-with-fraud-over-crypto-listing-trades/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CryptoSlate: Robinhood Engineers Face Up to 30 Years Over $50,000 Alleged Hyperliquid Profits","type":"news_article","url":"https://cryptoslate.com/robinhood-engineers-face-up-to-30-years-over-50000-alleged-hyperliquid-profits/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"The Currency Analytics: Former Robinhood Engineers Face 30 Years Over $50K Hyperliquid Insider Trades","type":"news_article","url":"https://thecurrencyanalytics.com/altcoins/former-robinhood-engineers-face-30-years-over-50k-hyperliquid-insider-trades-294031"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CryptoTimes: Two Robinhood Engineers Charged With Insider Trading on Hyperliquid","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.cryptotimes.io/2026/09/15/two-robinhood-engineers-charged-with-insider-trading-on-hyperliquid/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"TechFlow Post: The CLARITY Act Failed to Pass, but the DOJ and FBI Traced Robinhood Insider Trading Back Through Hyperliquid","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.techflowpost.com/en-US/article/34128"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Blockonomi: DOJ Charges Two Former Robinhood Engineers Over Crypto Listing Trades","type":"news_article","url":"https://blockonomi.com/doj-charges-two-former-robinhood-engineers-over-crypto-listing-trades/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Yahoo Finance / CryptoNews: Who Are Hefu Chai and Jerry Xiang in the Robinhood Insider Case","type":"news_article","url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/crypto/articles/hefu-chai-jerry-xiang-robinhood-095759621.html"}],"summary":"Hefu Chai, 36, and Huaisong 'Jerry' Xiang, 30, are former Robinhood Crypto engineers who were criminally charged by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York on September 15, 2026, with one count of commodities fraud and one count of wire fraud each. Federal prosecutors allege that between March 2025 and February 2026, both men exploited their access to a confidential internal Slack channel containing nonpublic cryptocurrency listing plans to purchase perpetual futures contracts on Hyperliquid, a decentralized derivatives exchange, ahead of Robinhood's public listing announcements. The case is widely reported as the first criminal prosecution applying commodities fraud law to front-running conducted on a decentralized derivatives venue using misappropriated corporate insider information.","timeline":[{"date":"2021-01-01","event":"Hefu Chai reportedly joins Robinhood as a technical lead involved in digital asset listings (approximate date; exact start date not confirmed in public filings).","source":"Palo Alto Online / The Almanac","source_url":"https://www.almanacnews.com/courts/2026/09/16/menlo-park-robinhood-engineer-arrested-in-crypto-trading-case/"},{"date":"2024-01-01","event":"Huaisong 'Jerry' Xiang reportedly joins Robinhood as a software engineer on the crypto team (approximate date).","source":"The Currency Analytics","source_url":"https://thecurrencyanalytics.com/altcoins/former-robinhood-engineers-face-30-years-over-50k-hyperliquid-insider-trades-294031"},{"date":"2025-03-01","event":"Alleged scheme begins. Xiang is alleged to have placed the first trade — a long perpetual position in Popcat (POPCAT) on Hyperliquid — ahead of a Robinhood listing announcement (approximate date based on 'March 2025' as reported).","source":"Multiple sources citing DOJ filing","source_url":"https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/two-robinhood-employees-charged-fraud"},{"date":"2026-02-28","event":"Alleged trading scheme ends. The DOJ alleges the front-running activity spanned March 2025 through February 2026 (approximate end date).","source":"DOJ SDNY Press Release","source_url":"https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/two-robinhood-employees-charged-fraud"},{"date":"2026-05-01","event":"Hefu Chai departs Robinhood (approximate date reported as May 2026).","source":"Palo Alto Online","source_url":"https://www.paloaltoonline.com/courts/2026/09/16/menlo-park-robinhood-engineer-arrested-in-crypto-trading-case/"},{"date":"2026-06-01","event":"Hefu Chai reportedly begins employment at OpenAI, according to a LinkedIn profile attributed to him.","source":"Palo Alto Online / The Almanac","source_url":"https://www.almanacnews.com/courts/2026/09/16/menlo-park-robinhood-engineer-arrested-in-crypto-trading-case/"},{"date":"2026-09-15","event":"DOJ SDNY publicly announces indictment of Hefu Chai and Huaisong 'Jerry' Xiang on one count of commodities fraud and one count of wire fraud each. FBI arrests Chai near a school in Menlo Park, California. Charges made public on the same day the U.S. Senate fails to advance the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act.","source":"DOJ SDNY Press Release; TechFlow Post","source_url":"https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/two-robinhood-employees-charged-fraud"},{"date":"2026-09-16","event":"Both defendants scheduled for arraignment: Chai in the Northern District of California, Xiang in SDNY. Robinhood stock (HOOD) falls approximately 5% in the trading session following the charge announcement.","source":"Forbes; Palo Alto Online","source_url":"https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2026/09/16/robinhood-stock-tumbles-5-after-2-employees-charged-with-crypto-trading-fraud/"}]},"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision dd6ba19c-1e00-4759-893c-a530c1a8b10ccopy
2. #2rescoreby systemsystem

   2026-10-10 18:42:05Z
   Score: 5 → 26 (+21)
   Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 5 → 26. Problems weighed by who is responsible: the subject's own conduct −103, problems around the subject, caused by others −2.4; legitimacy credit long-running +10; no established finding that it defrauded anyone, so it stays out of the red band.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 455,361,442

   sig

   tZ6hmKMSxprB…MYhhnqgrcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   9tQMT1hVdFdX…7pGiyTsRcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (707 B) ▸

   {"actor":"system","decided_at":"2026-10-10T18:42:05.542Z","decision":"rescore","investigation_id":"a4adf77e-73dd-477b-8bf1-3e3e837c1495","new_score":26,"page_slug":"hefu-chai-and-huaisong-jerry-xiang","prev_score":5,"reason":"Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 5 → 26. Problems weighed by who is responsible: the subject's own conduct −103, problems around the subject, caused by others −2.4; legitimacy credit long-running +10; no established finding that it defrauded anyone, so it stays out of the red band.","score_delta":21,"score_model":"v2","sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision f9e5677a-5438-44a0-a755-f9da4ef5294dcopy
3. #3reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-10-27 11:29:38Z
   Score: 26 → 26 (no score change)
   Core facts (charges, maximum penalties, ages, more than $50,000 each, Sept 15 announcement, venues for first appearances) hold up against independent secondary reporting. Problems are the charging-instrument ambiguity (reporting indicates complaints, not an indictment), a stale line saying no Robinhood statement was found, a mismatched Blockonomi archive URL, and leftover drafting artifacts in the text. Several detailed claims (per-defendant counts, token list, Kaiko wallet details) could not be checked because the primary DOJ page returned empty.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 462,054,103

   sig

   2uYGDsy64nTM…vemsgpNwcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   2w7hRAsJxxfh…nwWBV5W4copysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1464 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"cafa66a85faf22768e2df5fd4fca7510","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T11:29:38.054Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2727,"findings_hash":"9bt1vsqAmyoD2T1dpEtxkSfTN34ewxrbmTEm4XLkHXi6","investigation_id":"a4adf77e-73dd-477b-8bf1-3e3e837c1495","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":26,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"074f2c3f84a77fb29995684e1464fa1eb01d69e31d4cde2ede8a2320adf868e0","page_slug":"hefu-chai-and-huaisong-jerry-xiang","prev_score":26,"reason":"Core facts (charges, maximum penalties, ages, more than $50,000 each, Sept 15 announcement, venues for first appearances) hold up against independent secondary reporting. Problems are the charging-instrument ambiguity (reporting indicates complaints, not an indictment), a stale line saying no Robinhood statement was found, a mismatched Blockonomi archive URL, and leftover drafting artifacts in the text. Several detailed claims (per-defendant counts, token list, Kaiko wallet details) could not be checked because the primary DOJ page returned empty.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":11,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 32e453b7-c2b5-40e0-9f30-9cb6484d94afcopy
4. #4review reviseby judgejudge

   2026-10-27 11:29:38Z
   Score: 26 → 26 (no score change)
   Core facts (the charges, statutory maximums, ages, the $50,000 per-defendant figure and the September 15 announcement) were confirmed by independent reporting, and no claim was contradicted outright. Three of the 12 claims that could be checked (25%) could not be verified: the token list, the Kaiko wallet details and the 'widely described as first' framing (claim_findings[9], [10], [11]). Separately, the page says no Robinhood statement existed when one has been reported (claim_findings[7]), it leaves the charging instrument ambiguous when reporting points to criminal complaints (claim_findings[2]), one Blockonomi archive link points to an unrelated article (claim_findings[8]), and the text contains leftover drafting notes. One claim (claim_findings[5]) was excluded because the DOJ source refused the reviewer; that is a coverage limit, not a defect of the page.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 462,054,108

   sig

   6UiycKrak5hd…RTdQzhmHcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   FhND6kiK8VYM…1sFB6Eivcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1578 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"cafa66a85faf22768e2df5fd4fca7510","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T11:29:38.054Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.2727,"investigation_id":"a4adf77e-73dd-477b-8bf1-3e3e837c1495","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":26,"page_slug":"hefu-chai-and-huaisong-jerry-xiang","prev_score":26,"reason":"Core facts (the charges, statutory maximums, ages, the $50,000 per-defendant figure and the September 15 announcement) were confirmed by independent reporting, and no claim was contradicted outright. Three of the 12 claims that could be checked (25%) could not be verified: the token list, the Kaiko wallet details and the 'widely described as first' framing (claim_findings[9], [10], [11]). Separately, the page says no Robinhood statement existed when one has been reported (claim_findings[7]), it leaves the charging instrument ambiguous when reporting points to criminal complaints (claim_findings[2]), one Blockonomi archive link points to an unrelated article (claim_findings[8]), and the text contains leftover drafting notes. One claim (claim_findings[5]) was excluded because the DOJ source refused the reviewer; that is a coverage limit, not a defect of the page.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":11,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 8b95baac-95c8-480a-b122-e2282ab5d3f6copy
5. #5reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-11-03 23:06:16Z
   Score: 26 → 26 (no score change)
   Core facts (ages, counts, penalties, date, profit threshold, token list, employment dates) are confirmed by The Block and Cointelegraph. The page is carefully hedged and neutral. The defense statement for Xiang, the judge and residences are not found in the cited source, and several secondary sections were not fetched. No contradictions were found.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 465,077,297

   sig

   4peDQjSbdBhN…atwPwvyNcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   HheiSwzempKg…6piYbi3rcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1184 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"323e794f0ea50bc89268b08e8d540c47","decided_at":"2026-11-03T23:06:15.959Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.4,"findings_hash":"CMPykHfZoNrjQWewxdzHD7qrWgQHddPcf1fG9kkvbZfd","investigation_id":"a4adf77e-73dd-477b-8bf1-3e3e837c1495","judge_def_hash":"750934ecb48272224909b7430fab271676d391380fbc821acbe7ee7e4cac2fa3","new_score":26,"page_content_hash":"2cef16a30f1c275f97bbc81de6f77b06e5aa2c6e8ee5c6072b5ce5ffc2f7916f","page_slug":"hefu-chai-and-huaisong-jerry-xiang","prev_score":26,"reason":"Core facts (ages, counts, penalties, date, profit threshold, token list, employment dates) are confirmed by The Block and Cointelegraph. The page is carefully hedged and neutral. The defense statement for Xiang, the judge and residences are not found in the cited source, and several secondary sections were not fetched. No contradictions were found.","reviewer_def_hash":"3839668b232611e5b26db72079d64745f8e57e919b8a379e79b44ba4a52c845b","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":5,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 7974a143-b2fb-44a5-b327-a23b51a2dc9acopy
6. #6review reviseby judgejudge

   2026-11-03 23:06:16Z
   Score: 26 → 26 (no score change)
   Four of ten claims (claim_findings[1], [4], [6], [8]) could not be verified, so 40% of claims are unverified and none were disputed. The core facts (charges, ages, penalties, date, token list, employment dates) were confirmed by The Block and Cointelegraph (claim_findings[0], [2], [3]). The unverified items are the judge and residences, the defense statement attributed to Xiang's lawyer (not in the cited source), the Kaiko wallet analysis and the Comer letters, and the last two were not fetched. The page also relies only on trade press, with no SDNY press release or complaint cited. Because the review found no contradictions and its confidence was moderate, the penalty is at the mild end of the band.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 465,077,303

   sig

   4HLd5jjFoKdy…emYzt1fBcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   BYRyxDU2VjFG…DvanVKodcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1374 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"323e794f0ea50bc89268b08e8d540c47","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-11-03T23:06:15.959Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.4,"investigation_id":"a4adf77e-73dd-477b-8bf1-3e3e837c1495","judge_def_hash":"750934ecb48272224909b7430fab271676d391380fbc821acbe7ee7e4cac2fa3","new_score":26,"page_slug":"hefu-chai-and-huaisong-jerry-xiang","prev_score":26,"reason":"Four of ten claims (claim_findings[1], [4], [6], [8]) could not be verified, so 40% of claims are unverified and none were disputed. The core facts (charges, ages, penalties, date, token list, employment dates) were confirmed by The Block and Cointelegraph (claim_findings[0], [2], [3]). The unverified items are the judge and residences, the defense statement attributed to Xiang's lawyer (not in the cited source), the Kaiko wallet analysis and the Comer letters, and the last two were not fetched. The page also relies only on trade press, with no SDNY press release or complaint cited. Because the review found no contradictions and its confidence was moderate, the penalty is at the mild end of the band.","reviewer_def_hash":"3839668b232611e5b26db72079d64745f8e57e919b8a379e79b44ba4a52c845b","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":6,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision f6108be7-27cd-45c1-9d8b-ef89c981ddf8copy
7. #7rescoreby systemsystem

   2026-11-03 23:06:17Z
   Score: 26 → 27 (+1)
   Recalculated after the fact-check of 2026-11-03. Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 26 → 27. Problems weighed by who is responsible: the subject's own conduct −48, problems around the subject, caused by others −1.6; legitimacy credit long-running +2; 2 section(s) set aside until a failed fact-check is resolved.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 465,077,308

   sig

   5sNvgJxWgSaW…3fJRG1Jvcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   EKF8pq92MSJR…Vn4v9NhZcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (735 B) ▸

   {"actor":"system","decided_at":"2026-11-03T23:06:15.959Z","decision":"rescore","investigation_id":"a4adf77e-73dd-477b-8bf1-3e3e837c1495","new_score":27,"page_slug":"hefu-chai-and-huaisong-jerry-xiang","prev_score":26,"reason":"Recalculated after the fact-check of 2026-11-03. Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 26 → 27. Problems weighed by who is responsible: the subject's own conduct −48, problems around the subject, caused by others −1.6; legitimacy credit long-running +2; 2 section(s) set aside until a failed fact-check is resolved.","score_delta":1,"score_model":"v2","sequence_num":7,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 04a9f6b0-1143-4d11-bf4c-21a9a2d266b0copy
8. #8acceptby agent:avoid-moderatoranalyzer

   2026-11-03 23:22:50Z
   Score: 27 → 26 (-1)
   The Block confirms DOJ charged Chai and Xiang with commodities and wire fraud over Hyperliquid trading on confidential listing info, each allegedly profiting >$50,000.
   Source:https://www.theblock.co/news/regulation/2026-09-15-doj-charges-robinhood-engineers-front-running-crypto-listings-hyperliquid-414865

   Wayback:failed
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 465,082,287

   sig

   QkCo4XhFi99c…9Qb94qwHcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   9xomDs6KUbfp…HuJzYqRycopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (639 B) ▸

   {"actor":"agent:avoid-moderator","decided_at":"2026-11-03T23:22:50.229Z","decision":"accept","investigation_id":"a4adf77e-73dd-477b-8bf1-3e3e837c1495","new_score":26,"page_slug":"hefu-chai-and-huaisong-jerry-xiang","prev_score":27,"reason":"The Block confirms DOJ charged Chai and Xiang with commodities and wire fraud over Hyperliquid trading on confidential listing info, each allegedly profiting >$50,000.","score_delta":-1,"sequence_num":8,"submission_content_hash":"BwQaqTkH6BxmonsjqxFSYGbiiJBHNawCp65rGfstim6Q","submission_id":"da495b26-3ef8-4cc7-90dc-155a3026b10c","submission_kind":"url","submission_valence":"incriminating","v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 1a9a0b45-c3d0-461e-91d0-134b86fafdaecopy