Audit log

Every state-changing event for Google DeepMind: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.

1. #1reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-09-22 22:28:23Z
   Score: 55 → 55 (no score change)
   The page is largely well-sourced and accurate on discrete, checkable facts: the wrongful-death suit, the September 2026 antitrust slowdown complaint, the EU Android and DMA fines, the Gemini security-test breach, the Google Coin impersonation scam, and the DeepMind AGI safety paper all check out closely against independent tier-1/2 reporting, including precise dates, dollar figures, and quoted language. Two defects stand out: the page mischaracterizes which UK court dismissed the Prismall/DeepMind NHS representative claim and in what year (it was the High Court in May 2023, not the Court of Appeal, which did not rule until December 2024), and the page describes the Thele v. Google Gmail/Chat/Meet class action as still 'pending' and unadjudicated when in fact a federal judge granted Google's motion to dismiss (with leave to amend) in July 2026, weeks before this page's stated as-of date — a live piece of news the page's own cited sources, all from November 2025, could not have captured. No accepted community submissions were present to independently review.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 449,513,460

   sig

   27iVf6oMa2Sz…8QxpP5o7copyexplorer ↗

   hash

   4YbVzkUm2c4u…UvRJiu5xcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1650 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"4149a8a09e471a9d56a1f2549bdc4b1e","decided_at":"2026-09-22T22:28:23.866Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.0909,"findings_hash":"6JSWkYYpYgncAXTKyZDorSHMjiaag3jgLwEJQSfQU9mk","investigation_id":"b9bbaa78-e6f8-46f3-b03d-9be66d2c8150","new_score":55,"page_content_hash":"23ca290e97e70586f51767be18d587baec665166e1947f063cbeb623a23fbdf6","page_slug":"google-deepmind","prev_score":55,"reason":"The page is largely well-sourced and accurate on discrete, checkable facts: the wrongful-death suit, the September 2026 antitrust slowdown complaint, the EU Android and DMA fines, the Gemini security-test breach, the Google Coin impersonation scam, and the DeepMind AGI safety paper all check out closely against independent tier-1/2 reporting, including precise dates, dollar figures, and quoted language. Two defects stand out: the page mischaracterizes which UK court dismissed the Prismall/DeepMind NHS representative claim and in what year (it was the High Court in May 2023, not the Court of Appeal, which did not rule until December 2024), and the page describes the Thele v. Google Gmail/Chat/Meet class action as still 'pending' and unadjudicated when in fact a federal judge granted Google's motion to dismiss (with leave to amend) in July 2026, weeks before this page's stated as-of date — a live piece of news the page's own cited sources, all from November 2025, could not have captured. No accepted community submissions were present to independently review.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":1,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision b43f187d-6556-4101-b5fe-4486e30e1745copy
2. #2review reviseby judgejudge

   2026-09-22 22:28:24Z
   Score: 55 → 43 (-12)
   Of the 11 claims checked, 8 were confirmed accurate, 1 was disputed, and 2 were flagged as stale, putting the disputed/stale rate at roughly 27% — within the range where the page needs correction but not removal. claim_findings[2] misattributes the 2023 dismissal of the Royal Free NHS data lawsuit to the wrong UK court and the wrong final date. claim_findings[3] and [4] both stem from the same underlying gap: the page describes the Thele v. Google Gmail/Chat/Meet privacy suit as still pending when a federal judge dismissed it (with leave to amend) in July 2026, before this page's own as-of date. A high-priority coverage gap flagged by the reviewer confirms this litigation-status tracking needs to be kept current. All other major claims — the wrongful-death suit, the antitrust slowdown complaint, the EU fines, the Gemini security-test breach, and the Google Coin scam — were independently corroborated by multiple tier-1 sources.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 449,513,516

   sig

   4r7L3cpoUVKK…WP3TtCxfcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   FQqAZN99dpu5…YSaqMs9dcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (2511 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"4149a8a09e471a9d56a1f2549bdc4b1e","band_override":{"actual_delta":-12,"actual_verdict":"review_revise","disputed_pct":0.0909,"expected_delta_range":[0,0],"expected_verdict":"review_approve","rationale":"Of the 11 claims checked, 8 were confirmed accurate, 1 was disputed, and 2 were flagged as stale, putting the disputed/stale rate at roughly 27% — within the range where the page needs correction but not removal. claim_findings[2] misattributes the 2023 dismissal of the Royal Free NHS data lawsuit to the wrong UK court and the wrong final date. claim_findings[3] and [4] both stem from the same underlying gap: the page describes the Thele v. Google Gmail/Chat/Meet privacy suit as still pending when a federal judge dismissed it (with leave to amend) in July 2026, before this page's own as-of date. A high-priority coverage gap flagged by the reviewer confirms this litigation-status tracking needs to be kept current. All other major claims — the wrongful-death suit, the antitrust slowdown complaint, the EU fines, the Gemini security-test breach, and the Google Coin scam — were independently corroborated by multiple tier-1 sources."},"decided_at":"2026-09-22T22:28:23.866Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.0909,"investigation_id":"b9bbaa78-e6f8-46f3-b03d-9be66d2c8150","new_score":43,"page_slug":"google-deepmind","prev_score":55,"reason":"Of the 11 claims checked, 8 were confirmed accurate, 1 was disputed, and 2 were flagged as stale, putting the disputed/stale rate at roughly 27% — within the range where the page needs correction but not removal. claim_findings[2] misattributes the 2023 dismissal of the Royal Free NHS data lawsuit to the wrong UK court and the wrong final date. claim_findings[3] and [4] both stem from the same underlying gap: the page describes the Thele v. Google Gmail/Chat/Meet privacy suit as still pending when a federal judge dismissed it (with leave to amend) in July 2026, before this page's own as-of date. A high-priority coverage gap flagged by the reviewer confirms this litigation-status tracking needs to be kept current. All other major claims — the wrongful-death suit, the antitrust slowdown complaint, the EU fines, the Gemini security-test breach, and the Google Coin scam — were independently corroborated by multiple tier-1 sources.","score_delta":-12,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 7136fba4-dbe0-4d52-a30c-15dd250ccf37copy
3. #3reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-09-23 02:43:42Z
   Score: 55 → 55 (no score change)
   This page is unusually well-sourced and accurate. Every major factual claim checked — the DeepMind/Gemini-exchange disambiguation, the Royal Free NHS data scandal and Prismall litigation history (including precise court citations and dates), the Thele v. Google Gmail/Gemini privacy suit and its July 2026 dismissal on standing grounds, the Gavalas wrongful-death suit and its specific allegations, the September 2026 AI-slowdown antitrust suit, the EU Android and DMA fines, the Gemini security-test breach of three companies and Google's disclosure timeline, and the 'Google Coin' impersonation scam — was independently corroborated by multiple credible, current sources, often matching quoted figures, dates, and case citations exactly. The page also appropriately hedges lower-confidence material (e.g., scam-loss figures, unproven allegations in pending litigation) rather than overstating it. The only unverified item is an uncited aside comparing the Gavalas suit to prior OpenAI wrongful-death litigation, which should either be sourced or removed. No link rot, contradictions, or mischaracterizations were found in this pass.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 449,571,053

   sig

   jMrHzPWWaZTY…NWT7ghXYcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   767pjuz5GYYp…nbdSvcgAcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1712 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"d3313c1dc90c326fe6504b09368bda30","decided_at":"2026-09-23T02:43:41.857Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.0909,"findings_hash":"HJAMsyoUJ1BbczfTxgMR6h7dVbJWcFzVcvkNvqomoezo","investigation_id":"b9bbaa78-e6f8-46f3-b03d-9be66d2c8150","new_score":55,"page_content_hash":"49498c549555ff64d6c73b1af32dfc87af6a24361c6b3b5d74ab42fb65171850","page_slug":"google-deepmind","prev_score":55,"reason":"This page is unusually well-sourced and accurate. Every major factual claim checked — the DeepMind/Gemini-exchange disambiguation, the Royal Free NHS data scandal and Prismall litigation history (including precise court citations and dates), the Thele v. Google Gmail/Gemini privacy suit and its July 2026 dismissal on standing grounds, the Gavalas wrongful-death suit and its specific allegations, the September 2026 AI-slowdown antitrust suit, the EU Android and DMA fines, the Gemini security-test breach of three companies and Google's disclosure timeline, and the 'Google Coin' impersonation scam — was independently corroborated by multiple credible, current sources, often matching quoted figures, dates, and case citations exactly. The page also appropriately hedges lower-confidence material (e.g., scam-loss figures, unproven allegations in pending litigation) rather than overstating it. The only unverified item is an uncited aside comparing the Gavalas suit to prior OpenAI wrongful-death litigation, which should either be sourced or removed. No link rot, contradictions, or mischaracterizations were found in this pass.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision b0208553-0f3f-4159-a3db-cd6e21e9ef1ccopy
4. #4review approveby judgejudge

   2026-09-23 02:43:42Z
   Score: 55 → 55 (no score change)
   Of the 11 claims the reviewer checked, 10 were confirmed against primary or multiple independent sources and 1 was marked unverifiable rather than disputed, for a disputed rate of 0%. No claim_findings entries were contradicted, and the reviewer found no link rot or stale critical citations. The remaining coverage gaps are low or medium priority and call for additional sourcing and future follow-up, not correction of existing content, so they do not change the outcome.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 449,571,065

   sig

   5MMxKzpqR7Ck…AVPo936zcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   78sF8zyrcA3h…ttDHLrLbcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (952 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"d3313c1dc90c326fe6504b09368bda30","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-09-23T02:43:41.857Z","decision":"review_approve","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.0909,"investigation_id":"b9bbaa78-e6f8-46f3-b03d-9be66d2c8150","new_score":55,"page_slug":"google-deepmind","prev_score":55,"reason":"Of the 11 claims the reviewer checked, 10 were confirmed against primary or multiple independent sources and 1 was marked unverifiable rather than disputed, for a disputed rate of 0%. No claim_findings entries were contradicted, and the reviewer found no link rot or stale critical citations. The remaining coverage gaps are low or medium priority and call for additional sourcing and future follow-up, not correction of existing content, so they do not change the outcome.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision d3532469-56ff-4d26-bac8-21b677f79fe4copy