Audit log

Every state-changing event for Gate.io: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.

1. #1publishby system:backfill

   2026-05-26 15:34:15Z
   Score: ? → ? (no score change)
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 422,312,326

   sig

   2NhbHEfAdz3e…K7Snoqr7copyexplorer ↗

   hash

   y3hNFHobrVbr…SjSJSuXbcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (8219 B) ▸

   {"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"8cb38982-caca-4f41-81b3-f93e7d056a99","kind":"publish","page_slug":"gate","published_at":"2026-05-26T15:34:15.738Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"Gate.io","sections":[{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.panewslab.com/en/articles/2j0o0bhr","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://iq.wiki/wiki/lin-han","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.datawallet.com/crypto/gate-io-countries","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptoslate.com/zachxbt-calls-out-gate-io-for-keeping-2018-hack-under-wraps/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptoslate.com/north-korean-hackers-move-3-2m-from-gate-io-2018-hack/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.investing.com/news/cryptocurrency-news/zachxbt-slams-gateio-for-not-disclosing-2018-hack-behind-230m-loss-2945842","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://tokeninsight.com/en/news/gate.io-hacked-for-230m-in-april-2018-without-disclosure-says-zachxbt","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptonews.net/news/security/16224909/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.coinlive.com/news-flash/7089","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.datawallet.com/crypto/is-gate-io-a-safe-legit-exchange","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptoslate.com/zachxbt-calls-out-gate-io-for-keeping-2018-hack-under-wraps/","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.chaincatcher.com/en/article/2185419","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.okx.com/en-us/news/article/la-contract-pin-insertion-turmoil-gate-io-data-source-abnormal-liquidation-user-can-only-bear-loss-46576002446368","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/la-gate-liquidation-fiasco-sec-crypto-influencers-asia-express/","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://99bitcoins.com/news/gate-io-banned-in-india-users-unable-to-access-funds/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.cryptotimes.io/2024/06/14/4-offshore-crypto-exchanges-apply-to-return-india-post-ban/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://inc42.com/buzz/fiu-to-hear-pleas-of-seven-banned-crypto-platforms-to-restart-india-ops/","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.theblock.co/post/266222/gateio-trading-spike-quant-strategies","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.trustpilot.com/review/gate.io","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.cybercriminal.com/132778/gate-io-trading-concerns","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://news.bitcoin.com/5-privacy-coins-face-delisting-on-gate-io-exchange/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://castlecrypto.gg/gate-io-review/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.datawallet.com/crypto/gate-io-countries","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.trustpilot.com/review/gate.io","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.sikayetvar.com/en/gateio-us","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.cybercriminal.com/132819/gate-io-account-locking-review","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.cybercriminal.com/132778/gate-io-trading-concerns","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/01/22/2813210/0/en/Gate-io-s-Proof-of-Reserves-Implementation-Passes-Hacken-s-Security-Audit.html","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://hacken.io/case-studies/gateio-proof-of-reserves/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.coinlive.com/news-flash/7089","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptoslate.com/north-korean-hackers-move-3-2m-from-gate-io-2018-hack/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.databreaches.net/north-korean-hackers-move-3-2m-from-gate-io-2018-hack/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.chaincatcher.com/en/article/2082844","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2023/12/01/north-korean-hackers-lazarus-group-stolen-3b-in-cryptocurrency","type":"other","url":""}]}],"sources_used":[],"summary":"Gate.io (formerly Bter.com) is a centralized cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2013 by Han Lin, serving over 30 million users across 224 countries. The exchange has been flagged by on-chain investigator ZachXBT for allegedly concealing a $230 million hack attributed to North Korean state-sponsored hackers (Lazarus Group) that occurred in April 2018 and was never publicly disclosed to users. Additional concerns include a manipulated futures price feed incident causing millions in user losses in 2025, an AML-based ban by India's Financial Intelligence Unit in 2024, persistent user complaints about frozen withdrawals, and alleged wash trading activity inflating reported volumes.","timeline":[{"date":"2013-04-01","event":"Han Lin founds Bter.com cryptocurrency exchange in China","source":""},{"date":"2015-02-01","event":"Bter.com hacked for 7,170 BTC (approximately $1.75 million) from cold wallets; breach details never publicly disclosed","source":""},{"date":"2017-01-01","event":"Exchange rebrands from Bter.com to Gate.io and relocates to the Cayman Islands following Chinese regulatory pressure","source":""},{"date":"2018-04-18","event":"Gate.io allegedly hacked for approximately $234 million (10,778 BTC, 218,790 ETH, and other assets); attributed by on-chain investigators to North Korea's Lazarus Group; breach never publicly disclosed to users","source":""},{"date":"2022-08-01","event":"U.S. Treasury sanctions Tornado Cash; Gate.io begins delisting privacy coin perpetual contracts in response to AML regulatory pressure","source":""},{"date":"2023-02-01","event":"ZachXBT publishes on-chain investigation revealing Gate.io's alleged concealment of the 2018 hack; North Korean hackers move 1,944.72 ETH ($3.2 million) from dormant 2018 theft address","source":""},{"date":"2023-12-01","event":"Gate.io daily volume spikes to $4 billion; RATS token community accuses exchange of wash trading and fake volume manipulation","source":""},{"date":"2023-12-28","event":"India's Financial Intelligence Unit issues compliance show-cause notice to Gate.io and eight other offshore exchanges for PMLA violations","source":""},{"date":"2024-01-10","event":"Apple App Store in India blocks Gate.io following FIU noncompliance order; Google Play Store removal follows within days","source":""},{"date":"2024-01-22","event":"Hacken publishes Proof of Reserves audit for Gate.io; reports 115.47% reserve ratio across 170+ currencies","source":""},{"date":"2024-12-10","event":"Indian government formally blocks Gate.io website; users unable to access funds","source":""},{"date":"2024-12-25","event":"Gate.io delists Monero (XMR), Dash (DASH), Zcash (ZEC), Horizen (ZEN), and Verge (XVG) perpetual contracts citing regulatory scrutiny of privacy coins","source":""},{"date":"2025-06-04","event":"Gate.io launches $LA perpetual futures using a price index that incorporated an illiquid KuCoin market; price spikes 4,000% from approximately $0.60 to $25; mass user liquidations occur; thousands allege fraud; Gate.io offers 30 million USDT compensation only for negative-balance accounts, not liquidated users","source":""}]},"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 4f752f94-d12c-486d-bc77-7fa2ed74b283copy
2. #2reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-06-14 23:16:18Z
   Score: 18 → 18 (no score change)
   Blue-chip calibration review (Prompt A). Verdict: over-penalized. Page content is treated as accurate; the trust_score band is miscalibrated. Gate.io (now Gate.com) is a legitimate, functioning centralized exchange established in 2013 with 30M+ users, $9.4B+ in audited reserves at 125% coverage, and active regulatory licenses across multiple jurisdictions. The CRITICAL band (0–19) under AVOID.NET policy requires evidence of fraud, scam, or Ponzi mechanics by the entity itself. No such evidence exists for Gate.io: the $230M 2018 incident was a hack by North Korea's Lazarus Group in which Gate was the victim — the legitimate criticism is non-disclosure to users, not theft by the exchange. The $LA futures crisis in 2025 was attributed to a third-party data source error and compensated voluntarily at $30M+. The India regulatory ban was a PMLA compliance issue shared by eight other offshore exchanges. These incidents collectively justify elevated concern and a WARNING band, but not CRITICAL. A score of 32 reflects: serious transparency failure on the 2018 non-disclosure (-15), ongoing regulatory non-compliance in key markets (-10), documented user harm from the $LA incident (-10), and wash-trading accusations without definitive proof (-5); offset by proof-of-reserves, active licensing, operating continuity, and meaningful compensation behavior. An outside skeptic can verify this via Gate's Hacken audit, ZachXBT's on-chain thread, Kevin Lee's public LAUSDT statement, and the FIU India reporting.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 426,514,855

   sig

   W77ZJtHkF8Qc…9xwqWM6Kcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   HAEZTZiWNKXz…gpJwmukycopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1854 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-14T23:16:18.207Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"8cb38982-caca-4f41-81b3-f93e7d056a99","new_score":18,"page_slug":"gate","prev_score":18,"reason":"Blue-chip calibration review (Prompt A). Verdict: over-penalized. Page content is treated as accurate; the trust_score band is miscalibrated. Gate.io (now Gate.com) is a legitimate, functioning centralized exchange established in 2013 with 30M+ users, $9.4B+ in audited reserves at 125% coverage, and active regulatory licenses across multiple jurisdictions. The CRITICAL band (0–19) under AVOID.NET policy requires evidence of fraud, scam, or Ponzi mechanics by the entity itself. No such evidence exists for Gate.io: the $230M 2018 incident was a hack by North Korea's Lazarus Group in which Gate was the victim — the legitimate criticism is non-disclosure to users, not theft by the exchange. The $LA futures crisis in 2025 was attributed to a third-party data source error and compensated voluntarily at $30M+. The India regulatory ban was a PMLA compliance issue shared by eight other offshore exchanges. These incidents collectively justify elevated concern and a WARNING band, but not CRITICAL. A score of 32 reflects: serious transparency failure on the 2018 non-disclosure (-15), ongoing regulatory non-compliance in key markets (-10), documented user harm from the $LA incident (-10), and wash-trading accusations without definitive proof (-5); offset by proof-of-reserves, active licensing, operating continuity, and meaningful compensation behavior. An outside skeptic can verify this via Gate's Hacken audit, ZachXBT's on-chain thread, Kevin Lee's public LAUSDT statement, and the FIU India reporting.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision e062d95d-ede2-49ce-ae5a-0385d7b81c3ecopy
3. #3review approveby judgejudge

   2026-06-14 23:16:18Z
   Score: 18 → 32 (+14)
   This is a severity-calibration adjudication, not a content dispute. The reviewer found 0% of claims disputed across all 6 claim_findings (indices 0–5), each returning 'supported,' with reviewer confidence of 0.87. Gate.io is an actively operating exchange with 30M+ users, a 125% proof-of-reserves ratio audited by Hacken, and active regulatory licenses in multiple jurisdictions. The current CRITICAL band (score 18) requires evidence of fraud or scam mechanics by the entity itself; no such evidence exists. The 2018 $230M loss (claim_findings[1,2]) was a Lazarus Group hack in which Gate was the victim — the culpable act is non-disclosure, a serious transparency failure warranting a penalty, but not exchange-perpetrated fraud. The 2025 $LA futures incident (claim_findings[3]) was confirmed as a third-party data-source error with over $30M in voluntary compensation paid. The India regulatory action (claim_findings[5]) was a PMLA compliance issue shared by eight other exchanges. Taken together, these incidents justify the WARNING band but not CRITICAL. The page content stands accurate and published; the score is adjusted upward by +14 to reach the reviewer's recommended score of 32.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 426,514,874

   sig

   3JYq8vcdeLDx…gSgABPpBcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   z3X53TXfeN3f…FDiHtXrucopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1541 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-14T23:16:18.207Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"8cb38982-caca-4f41-81b3-f93e7d056a99","new_score":32,"page_slug":"gate","prev_score":18,"reason":"This is a severity-calibration adjudication, not a content dispute. The reviewer found 0% of claims disputed across all 6 claim_findings (indices 0–5), each returning 'supported,' with reviewer confidence of 0.87. Gate.io is an actively operating exchange with 30M+ users, a 125% proof-of-reserves ratio audited by Hacken, and active regulatory licenses in multiple jurisdictions. The current CRITICAL band (score 18) requires evidence of fraud or scam mechanics by the entity itself; no such evidence exists. The 2018 $230M loss (claim_findings[1,2]) was a Lazarus Group hack in which Gate was the victim — the culpable act is non-disclosure, a serious transparency failure warranting a penalty, but not exchange-perpetrated fraud. The 2025 $LA futures incident (claim_findings[3]) was confirmed as a third-party data-source error with over $30M in voluntary compensation paid. The India regulatory action (claim_findings[5]) was a PMLA compliance issue shared by eight other exchanges. Taken together, these incidents justify the WARNING band but not CRITICAL. The page content stands accurate and published; the score is adjusted upward by +14 to reach the reviewer's recommended score of 32.","score_delta":14,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 488f6339-f2d1-4331-b3fd-6604620f485fcopy
4. #4reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-10-09 05:29:59Z
   Score: 32 → 32 (no score change)
   The page's core narrative — the 2018 ZachXBT-alleged $234M hack, the 2015 Bter.com hack, the India FIU action, the June 2025 $LA futures incident, and the December 2024 privacy-coin delistings — is substantially corroborated by the cited reporting and by independent sources. However, several specific details are unsupported or wrong: the $LA incident's KuCoin attribution and most of its price figures do not appear in any of the three cited articles (all of which report different, lower figures); a 'personal error by an employee' quote attributed to Gate.io appears in no source and contradicts the cited reporting's account of Gate.io declining to explain the cause; the claimed Vanuatu/VFSC license is unsupported and likely wrong given Gate.io's documented Dubai VARA and Malta MiCA licenses; the Trustpilot score/suspension claim does not match the live page; the DOJ/FBI attribution of the $3B Lazarus figure contradicts the cited source's own attribution to Recorded Future; and a timeline entry claims Gate.io delisted privacy-coin perpetuals in August 2022, which is unsupported and contradicts the page's own, well-sourced December 2024 date for that same event. Two cybercriminal.com citations (used across two sections and sources_used) are now dead, redirecting to a GoDaddy parked-domain page. Headline user/asset-count figures (30M users, 4,600 altcoins) appear stale against the current cited source, which now reports 58M+ users and 4,800+ assets.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 454,772,676

   sig

   3rT3mzF6gGGw…nPTVHpJGcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   ARZ2xPpnje9m…H7ZUhcvdcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (2058 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"b93ab227b1f2954961843ffb6a3a87e7","decided_at":"2026-10-09T05:29:58.699Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2333,"findings_hash":"ATVt4jk9nM9ckmQuaGT7tzfYhgLE2ogVuWv4qqRtbknn","investigation_id":"8cb38982-caca-4f41-81b3-f93e7d056a99","mode":"findings_only","new_score":32,"page_content_hash":"288e46edabe5ba208529afa3ea615db6e583caabfc573e06fb6a0ff006365a37","page_slug":"gate","prev_score":32,"reason":"The page's core narrative — the 2018 ZachXBT-alleged $234M hack, the 2015 Bter.com hack, the India FIU action, the June 2025 $LA futures incident, and the December 2024 privacy-coin delistings — is substantially corroborated by the cited reporting and by independent sources. However, several specific details are unsupported or wrong: the $LA incident's KuCoin attribution and most of its price figures do not appear in any of the three cited articles (all of which report different, lower figures); a 'personal error by an employee' quote attributed to Gate.io appears in no source and contradicts the cited reporting's account of Gate.io declining to explain the cause; the claimed Vanuatu/VFSC license is unsupported and likely wrong given Gate.io's documented Dubai VARA and Malta MiCA licenses; the Trustpilot score/suspension claim does not match the live page; the DOJ/FBI attribution of the $3B Lazarus figure contradicts the cited source's own attribution to Recorded Future; and a timeline entry claims Gate.io delisted privacy-coin perpetuals in August 2022, which is unsupported and contradicts the page's own, well-sourced December 2024 date for that same event. Two cybercriminal.com citations (used across two sections and sources_used) are now dead, redirecting to a GoDaddy parked-domain page. Headline user/asset-count figures (30M users, 4,600 altcoins) appear stale against the current cited source, which now reports 58M+ users and 4,800+ assets.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 0cb15dbd-37e3-4540-b19d-88e1c61e9ccecopy
5. #5reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-10-27 19:26:22Z
   Score: 32 → 32 (no score change)
   Core regulatory and incident claims that were checked (CIMA notice, 2015 Bter loss, StatCounter attack, ZachXBT publication date) match their sources. The Lazarus Group name is not in the fetched CryptoSlate article, though the page hedges it as an allegation. Several claims could not be checked because of 403s, and user-complaint, India, $LA and PoR sections were not independently verified. The subject is operating with no found sanction or shutdown.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 462,188,592

   sig

   35bNLu7RxgBf…56jF7zy6copyexplorer ↗

   hash

   GP82ALeaeeRn…YTuekLufcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1330 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"b3a0b02d881e3c0dce6ace707e3064dc","blocked_count":2,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T19:26:22.161Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0,"findings_hash":"A5ZktPRgsXYkMqmjTKiRSu2EPg6AGP9MymGPaZAQD7Sn","investigation_id":"8cb38982-caca-4f41-81b3-f93e7d056a99","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":32,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":2},"page_content_hash":"d027462373adfd9ecc69d9bc2179094b51f5bd4c93fea727f25af714945c13ce","page_slug":"gate","prev_score":32,"reason":"Core regulatory and incident claims that were checked (CIMA notice, 2015 Bter loss, StatCounter attack, ZachXBT publication date) match their sources. The Lazarus Group name is not in the fetched CryptoSlate article, though the page hedges it as an allegation. Several claims could not be checked because of 403s, and user-complaint, India, $LA and PoR sections were not independently verified. The subject is operating with no found sanction or shutdown.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":6,"sequence_num":5,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision f8345958-07b2-475b-833e-c26999e97286copy
6. #6review approveby judgejudge

   2026-10-27 19:26:22Z
   Score: 32 → 32 (no score change)
   Of 8 claims checked, 2 could not be read because the source blocked the reviewer (claim_findings[5], [6]) and are left out of the calculation. Of the remaining 6, none were disputed or unverifiable, so the disputed share is 0%. The CIMA notice, the 2015 Bter loss, the StatCounter attack and the ZachXBT publication date matched their sources. One wording point stands: the fetched CryptoSlate article does not name the Lazarus Group (claim_findings[2]), though the page presents it as an allegation. The rebrand month is also uncertain (claim_findings[7]). Neither changes the outcome. The reviewer's confidence is moderate (0.5) and several sections were not independently verified, which is a coverage limit and not a defect of the page.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 462,188,596

   sig

   2FSRXYnTz7V2…9y4CMYcLcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   CLcYokxHPpFB…f7SVdQtUcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1790 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"b3a0b02d881e3c0dce6ace707e3064dc","band_override":null,"blocked_count":2,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T19:26:22.161Z","decision":"review_approve","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0,"investigation_id":"8cb38982-caca-4f41-81b3-f93e7d056a99","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":32,"page_slug":"gate","prev_score":32,"reason":"Of 8 claims checked, 2 could not be read because the source blocked the reviewer (claim_findings[5], [6]) and are left out of the calculation. Of the remaining 6, none were disputed or unverifiable, so the disputed share is 0%. The CIMA notice, the 2015 Bter loss, the StatCounter attack and the ZachXBT publication date matched their sources. One wording point stands: the fetched CryptoSlate article does not name the Lazarus Group (claim_findings[2]), though the page presents it as an allegation. The rebrand month is also uncertain (claim_findings[7]). Neither changes the outcome. The reviewer's confidence is moderate (0.5) and several sections were not independently verified, which is a coverage limit and not a defect of the page.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":6,"sequence_num":6,"severity_override":{"applied":false,"band":null,"from_band":"approve","reason":"The review reports no material or critical omissions and no contradiction with the subject's status. The two omissions (a July 2026 user-theft dispute seen only in search snippets, and Bter's earlier 2014 NXT hack) are minor, and the subject is reported as operating with no sanction or shutdown."},"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 65f4d919-e20d-41c6-8dc3-8772f328e047copy