Audit log

Every state-changing event for Fake GTA 6 Crypto Wallet Drainer Sites: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.

1. #1reviewby reviewerreviewer

   2026-10-27 11:01:36Z
   Score: 2 → 2 (no score change)
   Every checked factual claim matches the Malwarebytes article, including price, chains, geofence list, domains, wallet address and dates. The only defect found is an archive_url for the U.Today source that points to an unrelated article. The page honestly states that loss scale is unconfirmed. Current status of the scam sites could not be determined.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 462,046,192

   sig

   4ZB2JWpHpNiE…wxhY4VqAcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   7Y4M8xTbQWpb…5dymRqmPcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1220 B) ▸

   {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"3ec82a3467f1ecddfdd5ffe286ab3f2e","decided_at":"2026-10-27T11:01:36.026Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0,"findings_hash":"CXStdYDvo6rTDZErBHTMCQvzVqATXYYpXeSXAQoqWsZK","investigation_id":"7cf81c33-e771-4dc1-9b39-8425c280b0b8","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":2,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"d5a9545e7adf540ef4f4b5dcbf176daaa666a3fc7511c4ceeff56274764043ac","page_slug":"fake-gta-6-crypto-wallet-drainer-sites","prev_score":2,"reason":"Every checked factual claim matches the Malwarebytes article, including price, chains, geofence list, domains, wallet address and dates. The only defect found is an archive_url for the U.Today source that points to an unrelated article. The page honestly states that loss scale is unconfirmed. Current status of the scam sites could not be determined.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":1,"subject_status":"unknown","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision d3123832-abae-45d6-bcd8-9b36f32a776ccopy
2. #2review approveby judgejudge

   2026-10-27 11:01:36Z
   Score: 2 → 2 (no score change)
   Six of the seven checked claims (claim_findings[0] to [5]) were confirmed against the Malwarebytes report, including the price, the affected chains, the geofencing country list, the two domains, the Solana wallet address and the publication date. None were disputed or unverifiable, so the disputed share is 0%. The only defect is claim_findings[6], an archive link for the U.Today source that points to an unrelated article, which is a minor citation fix and does not affect the page's conclusions. The one omission is minor, and the current status of the scam sites could not be determined either way. The open coverage gaps (on-chain analysis, front-end domain, single primary source) are medium or low priority and suggest expansion rather than a penalty.
   anchoranchored

   chain

   ●mainnet-betaslot 462,046,198

   sig

   3L58cVrztuVY…ZR5WUUfTcopyexplorer ↗

   hash

   8KGuQsPH4uDD…EN7q2ekbcopysha256 → base58

   verifying row…full verify ↗

   canonical bytes (1425 B) ▸

   {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"3ec82a3467f1ecddfdd5ffe286ab3f2e","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T11:01:36.026Z","decision":"review_approve","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0,"investigation_id":"7cf81c33-e771-4dc1-9b39-8425c280b0b8","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":2,"page_slug":"fake-gta-6-crypto-wallet-drainer-sites","prev_score":2,"reason":"Six of the seven checked claims (claim_findings[0] to [5]) were confirmed against the Malwarebytes report, including the price, the affected chains, the geofencing country list, the two domains, the Solana wallet address and the publication date. None were disputed or unverifiable, so the disputed share is 0%. The only defect is claim_findings[6], an archive link for the U.Today source that points to an unrelated article, which is a minor citation fix and does not affect the page's conclusions. The one omission is minor, and the current status of the scam sites could not be determined either way. The open coverage gaps (on-chain analysis, front-end domain, single primary source) are medium or low priority and suggest expansion rather than a penalty.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}

   Verify offline (run on your own machine)

   python -m src.verify_decision 77a830ac-cc6b-45bf-947b-451cd0d3a428copy