Fact-check findings
What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Everlyn against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.
These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.
“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.
Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.
unverifiable
2 claimsNo source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.
- #6[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Legal, regulatory and scam allegations
“Searches for Everlyn combined with scam, fraud, rug pull and lawsuit returned no relevant results.”
reviewerNo regulatory actions, lawsuits or scam allegations foundMy own searches for exploit, hack, shutdown, rebrand and delisting also found nothing about Everlyn. The page hedges this as absence of findings. - #8[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
“Reported $15M funding round led by Mysten Labs (DefiLlama lists it around end of August 2025).”
reviewerTimeline: funding round dated 2025-08Source blocked. Reports around Aug 31 to Sep 1, 2025 are consistent with the entry.
partially supported
2 claimsThe cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.
- #5[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Funding and backers
“Crypto-industry outlets and data aggregators report that Everlyn raised $15 million in a round around late August to September 2025, led by Mysten Labs (developer of the Sui blockchain).”
reviewerMysten Labs led the roundSome outlets say Mysten led. Others do not name a lead, and it is not confirmed from a primary source. The $250M valuation matches search results. The hedge 'Details were not confirmed against primary filings' covers this. - #7[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: LYN token and market risk
“Search snapshots showed widely varying prices and an all-time high near $1, so the token is volatile.”
reviewerSearch snapshots showed an all-time high near $1A DefiLlama snippet gives an ATH of about $0.61, not near $1. I could not read the page, so I left no correction. The volatility point stands.
confirmed
4 claimsThe cited evidence supports the claim as written.
- #1[confirmed][no action needed]in section: LYN token and market risk
“MEXC listed LYN/USDT in its Innovation Zone on 2025-10-06, with a contract address on what appears to be BNB Smart Chain, and warned that prices of Innovation Zone projects may fluctuate greatly.”
reviewerMEXC listed LYN/USDT in its Innovation Zone on 2025-10-06Date and BSC contract confirmed on the MEXC announcement. I did not check the risk-warning wording. - #2[confirmed][no action needed]in section: LYN token and market risk
“LYN has a stated total supply of 1,000,000,000.”
reviewerLYN total supply 1,000,000,000Matches the MEXC announcement. - #3[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Overview and product
“MEXC's listing announcement describes Everlyn AI as a Web3-native AI video protocol that generates videos in about 25 seconds using its Everlyn-1 model.”
reviewerEverlyn-1 generates video in about 25 seconds per MEXCAttribution is accurate and properly hedged. - #4[confirmed][no action needed]in the summary
“Crypto-industry sources report a $15 million funding round involving Mysten Labs.”
reviewerEverlyn raised $15M with Mysten Labs as leadSeveral search results show a $15M round with Mysten Labs as an investor. The summary's hedged wording is supported. Search results only; both cited pages returned 403.