← Bunny Finance5 decisions on this page
Audit log
Every state-changing event for Bunny Finance: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.
- #1publishby system:backfill2026-05-21 18:45:39ZScore: ? → ? (no score change)anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 421,258,808
- sig
3j6yVSjiRR78…RTgWhyQ1explorer ↗- hash
EGPLPKrpTXFZ…5f7nLP3Csha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (8214 B) ▸
{"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"dfc8260f-49f7-49ec-911f-236582a8d053","kind":"publish","page_slug":"bunny","published_at":"2026-05-21T18:45:39.247Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"Bunny Finance","sections":[{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2021/05/20/flash-loan-attack-causes-defi-token-bunny-to-crash-over-95","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.halborn.com/blog/post/explained-the-pancakebunny-protocol-hack-may-2021","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cointelegraph.com/news/pancakebunny-tanks-96-following-200m-flash-loan-exploit","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://decrypt.co/71585/pancakebunny-defi-exploit","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://rekt.news/pancakebunny-rekt","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://medium.com/amber-group/bsc-flash-loan-attack-pancakebunny-3361b6d814fd","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://rekt.news/pancakebunny2-rekt","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptoslate.com/bsc-defi-app-pancakebunny-releases-post-mortem-of-2-4-million-exploit/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://beincrypto.com/polybunny-finance-releases-2-4m-defi-attack-post-mortem-report/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://pancakebunny.medium.com/polybunny-post-mortem-compensation-42b5c35ce957","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.halborn.com/blog/post/explained-the-qubit-hack-january-2022","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cointelegraph.com/news/qubit-finance-suffers-80-million-loss-following-hack","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2022/01/28/defi-protocol-qubit-finance-exploited-for-80m","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-01-28/hackers-seize-80-million-from-qubit-in-lastest-defi-attack","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://therecord.media/qubit-finance-platform-hacked-for-80-million-worth-of-cryptocurrency","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/qubit-hack-north-korea/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://beincrypto.com/qubit-finance-hacked-for-80-million-in-latest-defi-exploit/","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://pancakebunny-finance.readthedocs.io/en/main/audits.html","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.halborn.com/blog/post/explained-the-pancakebunny-protocol-hack-may-2021","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.halborn.com/blog/post/explained-the-qubit-hack-january-2022","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://rekt.news/pancakebunny2-rekt","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://pancakebunny.medium.com/pancake-bunny-x-binance-labs-introducing-your-team-mound-288c21209375","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://techcrunch.com/2021/04/12/binance-labs-leads-1-6m-seed-round-in-defi-startup-mound-the-developer-of-pancake-bunny/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://beincrypto.com/binance-labs-leads-1-6m-investment-for-mound-defi-startup/","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://pancakebunny.medium.com/pancakebunny-recovery-plan-63324473ceb4","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.bitcoininsider.org/article/117201/pancakebunny-releases-recovery-plan-post-flash-loan-attack","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://pancakebunny.medium.com/polybunny-pbunny-mnd-compensation-cee3d5883ae6","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/pancakebunny/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://coinmarketcap.com/alexandria/article/the-tragicomedy-of-pancakebunny","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/pancakebunny/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://defillama.com/protocol/bunny","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/pancake-bunny","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptopotato.com/pancake-bunny-exploit-44-million-stolen-as-bunny-token-crashed-99-in-seconds/","type":"other","url":""}]}],"sources_used":[],"summary":"PancakeBunny (Bunny Finance) was a Binance Smart Chain yield-optimizer developed by the anonymous team MOUND (Mound Inc.), which received a $1.6 million seed round led by Binance Labs in April 2021. The protocol suffered three separate exploits across 2021–2022 totaling over $127 million in losses, including a $45 million flash loan attack in May 2021, a $2.4 million polyBUNNY exploit on Polygon in July 2021, and an $80 million hack of its affiliated lending protocol Qubit Finance in January 2022. The BUNNY token has lost more than 99% of its all-time high value, the protocol transitioned to a DAO structure in early 2022, and no stolen funds from any exploit were publicly confirmed as recovered.","timeline":[{"date":"2021-04-12","event":"Binance Labs leads $1.6 million seed round in Mound Inc., developer of PancakeBunny. IDEO CoLab, SparkLabs also participate. Team exits stealth mode but remains anonymous.","source":""},{"date":"2021-04-21","event":"BUNNY token reaches all-time high of approximately $576.25.","source":""},{"date":"2021-05-19","event":"Flash loan attack on PancakeBunny BSC protocol. Attacker borrows ~2.3 million BNB via eight flash loans, manipulates internal price oracle, mints ~697,000 BUNNY tokens, and nets approximately 114,631 WBNB ($45 million). BUNNY price collapses from ~$146 to ~$6.","source":""},{"date":"2021-05-21","event":"PancakeBunny publishes post-mortem characterizing the incident as an 'economic exploit' rather than a smart contract breach. Team announces recovery plan.","source":""},{"date":"2021-06-01","event":"PancakeBunny launches formal recovery plan including pBUNNY compensation token, Compensation Pool funded by performance fees, and MND (Mound) token at 1.5x BUNNY swap ratio.","source":""},{"date":"2021-07-16","event":"polyBUNNY exploit on Polygon network. Attacker uses nearly identical flash loan minting technique, minting 2.1 million polyBUNNY tokens worth approximately $2.4 million. polyBUNNY price falls from ~$10 to ~$1.78.","source":""},{"date":"2021-07-21","event":"Team announces it will slow pace of releases, implement testnet deployments, bounty programs, and multi-layer code reviews before future mainnet launches. $2.4 million MND compensation plan announced for polyBUNNY holders.","source":""},{"date":"2022-01-27","event":"Qubit Finance (QBridge) hacked for approximately $80 million. Attacker exploits legacy deposit function in the cross-chain bridge contract to mint qXETH without depositing real ETH, draining 206,809 BNB. Funds routed through Tornado Cash. Chainalysis assesses attack as likely North Korea-linked.","source":""},{"date":"2022-01-31","event":"Qubit Finance offers attacker escalating bug bounties up to $2 million in exchange for returning the $80 million. No response or fund return reported.","source":""},{"date":"2022-02-01","event":"PancakeBunny transitions to DAO structure as active development winds down.","source":""},{"date":"2022-02-01","event":"PancakeBunny publishes 2022 roadmap, but subsequent development activity is minimal.","source":""},{"date":"2024-01-01","event":"BUNNY token trading near $0.06 with market cap below $35,000 — over 99.9% below all-time high. Protocol TVL near zero. No confirmed recovery of funds from any of the three exploits.","source":""}]},"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 243c2a10-06a5-4e6b-aab8-1961c0f84d0e - #2rescoreby systemsystem2026-10-10 18:49:28ZScore: 10 → 51 (+41)Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 10 → 51. Problems weighed by who is responsible: incidents the subject suffered −9.6, concerns that are not fraud −6.4, problems around the subject, caused by others −1.6; legitimacy credit long-running +4.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 455,369,540
- sig
2ytw1Zy4qeo4…UVPnzhQtexplorer ↗- hash
5t6BHcQWonFn…e1yWKFw2sha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (636 B) ▸
{"actor":"system","decided_at":"2026-10-10T18:49:28.474Z","decision":"rescore","investigation_id":"dfc8260f-49f7-49ec-911f-236582a8d053","new_score":51,"page_slug":"bunny","prev_score":10,"reason":"Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 10 → 51. Problems weighed by who is responsible: incidents the subject suffered −9.6, concerns that are not fraud −6.4, problems around the subject, caused by others −1.6; legitimacy credit long-running +4.","score_delta":41,"score_model":"v2","sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 9d1f4362-6b38-41e6-8a12-c3143cfdbc7f - #3rescoreby systemsystem2026-11-01 23:13:54ZScore: 51 → 44 (-7)Re-read and rescored after the page was re-researched (2026-11-01). Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 51 → 44. Problems weighed by who is responsible: incidents the subject suffered −18, concerns that are not fraud −6.4, problems around the subject, caused by others −2.4; legitimacy credit long-running +6.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 464,272,829
- sig
45YiLhuKgUe4…cHyj9cb9explorer ↗- hash
4Ruyqz6EvLtx…5ZBJetF9sha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (703 B) ▸
{"actor":"system","decided_at":"2026-11-01T23:13:54.023Z","decision":"rescore","investigation_id":"dfc8260f-49f7-49ec-911f-236582a8d053","new_score":44,"page_slug":"bunny","prev_score":51,"reason":"Re-read and rescored after the page was re-researched (2026-11-01). Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 51 → 44. Problems weighed by who is responsible: incidents the subject suffered −18, concerns that are not fraud −6.4, problems around the subject, caused by others −2.4; legitimacy credit long-running +6.","score_delta":-7,"score_model":"v2","sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 5e7fe20b-5823-44b3-8d12-28c10bf8ab5a - #4reviewby reviewerreviewer2026-11-01 23:15:01ZScore: 44 → 44 (no score change)The sampled claims (Rekt ranking and attack mechanics, Chainalysis attribution, seed round) are supported by the sources fetched. The claim that the protocol is still operating but not formally shut down could not be verified and may be at odds with Dealroom's snippet. The anonymity claim is not shown by the cited source. Only a small subset of the many numeric claims was checked, and several key sources were blocked.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 464,273,129
- sig
4CCKYSWmhVgL…eRmkVZR6explorer ↗- hash
Xgy2TT6pHY7P…dWmHx6R9sha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1261 B) ▸
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"a71b80ed1f324d5dd27d12928b0b10d2","decided_at":"2026-11-01T23:15:01.323Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2,"findings_hash":"3vMSWZHzr9tC8jkVEeC6Q2qjfcXq7GjkDNjRtbTqYGqN","investigation_id":"dfc8260f-49f7-49ec-911f-236582a8d053","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":44,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"17f7f8c5ddd7aa5472ecd4bccfe95e78aff9534ea548371b4fad6ecb916b120e","page_slug":"bunny","prev_score":44,"reason":"The sampled claims (Rekt ranking and attack mechanics, Chainalysis attribution, seed round) are supported by the sources fetched. The claim that the protocol is still operating but not formally shut down could not be verified and may be at odds with Dealroom's snippet. The anonymity claim is not shown by the cited source. Only a small subset of the many numeric claims was checked, and several key sources were blocked.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"subject_status":"unknown","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 9bf9ebb2-7f85-495b-8c96-47c59c8da1cf - #5review reviseby judgejudge2026-11-01 23:15:01ZScore: 44 → 44 (no score change)Of five sampled claims, three were confirmed by Tier 1 or Tier 2 sources (claim_findings[0], [1], [2]), one was only partly supported because the cited TechCrunch article does not address the team's anonymity (claim_findings[3]), and one could not be verified: the statement that the protocol still operates and has not been formally shut down (claim_findings[4]). That gives 1 of 5 claims unverified (20%), in the minor-issues band. The unverified claim is about current status, a high-priority coverage gap, and a dated-unknown Dealroom snippet hints the protocol may have ceased operations. The reviewer reported no contradiction with the page and rated the one omission, the 2024 Tornado Cash movement of exploit funds, as minor. The reviewer's confidence was low (0.4) and only a sample of citations was checked, so the penalty is kept at the mild end of the band.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 464,273,134
- sig
3dU7zpH5LhJ4…kvHePeBNexplorer ↗- hash
3ssY7g5SCjiY…9qFoJ49Wsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1505 B) ▸
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"a71b80ed1f324d5dd27d12928b0b10d2","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T23:15:01.323Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.2,"investigation_id":"dfc8260f-49f7-49ec-911f-236582a8d053","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":44,"page_slug":"bunny","prev_score":44,"reason":"Of five sampled claims, three were confirmed by Tier 1 or Tier 2 sources (claim_findings[0], [1], [2]), one was only partly supported because the cited TechCrunch article does not address the team's anonymity (claim_findings[3]), and one could not be verified: the statement that the protocol still operates and has not been formally shut down (claim_findings[4]). That gives 1 of 5 claims unverified (20%), in the minor-issues band. The unverified claim is about current status, a high-priority coverage gap, and a dated-unknown Dealroom snippet hints the protocol may have ceased operations. The reviewer reported no contradiction with the page and rated the one omission, the 2024 Tornado Cash movement of exploit funds, as minor. The reviewer's confidence was low (0.4) and only a sample of citations was checked, so the penalty is kept at the mild end of the band.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":5,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 67965b5a-27e6-4a13-b1bd-bdf5ed355880
How verification works. The “Row integrity” check above is computed in your browser — your machine recomputes the SHA-256 of the canonical bytes and compares against the stored hash. No avoid.net server can fake that check. The “full verify” link goes one level deeper: your browser fetches the on-chain transaction from a Solana RPC node and confirms the same hash is in the memo. If you don’t want to trust either avoid.net or the public RPC, run the CLI verifier on your own machine —
python -m src.verify_decision <event_id>.