← Bitget5 decisions on this page
Audit log
Every state-changing event for Bitget: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot taken at submission time, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key.
- #1publishby system:backfill2026-05-19 20:59:36ZScore: ? → ? (no score change)anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 420,846,225
- sig
3wwubJd4TreH…hShERvbDexplorer ↗- hash
3ikE2DRnSQGZ…aJDKBdFmsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (8092 B) ▸
{"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"1297716a-0f85-4f49-905d-8e9cddae14b8","kind":"publish","page_slug":"bitget","published_at":"2026-05-19T20:59:36.713Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"Bitget","sections":[{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitget"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://www.theblock.co/learn/308617/what-is-bitget"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://www.prnewswire.com/in/news-releases/bitget-appoints-gracy-chen-as-ceo-302151311.html"}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/08/21/2933475/0/en/Bitget-Achieves-ISO-27001-2022-Certification-Strengthening-Commitment-to-Transparency-and-Security.html"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://www.theblock.co/post/352090/bitget-will-legally-pursue-8-accounts-suspected-of-profiting-20-million-from-voxel-trading-manipulation"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://rekt.news/bitgets-voxel-meltdown"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://www.crowdfundinsider.com/2025/04/238965-bitget-initiates-legal-action-against-accounts-in-20m-voxel-market-manipulation-incident/"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://dfi.wa.gov/consumer/alerts/possible-cryptocurrency-fraud-wwwbitgetsio"}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news-releases/amf-news-releases/amf-reminds-public-cryptoasset-trading-platform-bitget-blacklisted"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://www.asic.gov.au/about-asic/news-centre/news-items/investor-alert-asic-warns-investors-of-bitget-s-unlicensed-crypto-asset-futures-products/"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2025/08/06/philippines-sec-cracks-down-on-unregistered-crypto-exchanges-as-new-rules-kick-in"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://www.idnfinancials.com/news/56446/philippines-blocks-10-crypto-exchanges-bybit-and-bitget-blacklisted"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://medium.com/@irncyp/crypto-whistleblower-the-5-6m-bitget-scam-and-the-industry-silence-that-enabled-it-8d2282eedb72"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://www.bitget.com/promotion/regulatory-license"}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/10/22/3171093/0/en/Bitget-Releases-October-2025-Proof-of-Reserves-POR-with-307-Coverage-in-Bitcoin-BTC-for-Users-Reserves.html"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://github.com/BitgetLimited/proof-of-reserves"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://www.bitget.com/proof-of-reserves"}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/12/08/3201340/0/en/Bitget-October-2025-Protection-Fund-Maintains-741M-Average-Despite-Slumptober.html"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://bitcoinist.com/bitget-raises-its-protection-fund-to-300m-to-reassure-users-after-ftxs-collapse/"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/bitget-increases-protection-fund-to-300m-to-safeguard-users-assets-after-ftxs-fall-301682663.html"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://medium.com/@irncyp/bitget-legal-timeline-misconduct-evidence-eu-law-violations-866087147d27"}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://news.bitcoin.com/zachxbt-bitget-supply-control-manipulation-rave-river-siren-lab-2026/"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://www.theblock.co/post/401290/zachxbt-alleges-95-insider-control-of-lab-token-in-investigation-into-ai-terminals-6-billion-fdv-project"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://www.amf-france.org/en/warnings/blacklists/crypto-currencies/wwwbitgetcom"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://www.asic.gov.au/about-asic/news-centre/news-items/investor-alert-asic-warns-investors-of-bitget-s-unlicensed-crypto-asset-futures-products/"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://coinbureau.com/analysis/is-bitget-safe"},{"credibility":3,"name":"","type":"other","url":"https://brokerchooser.com/safety/bitget-broker-safe-or-scam"}]}],"sources_used":[],"summary":"Bitget is a Seychelles-incorporated centralized cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2018, offering spot, futures, and copy trading to a claimed user base exceeding 150 million. While the exchange has never suffered a direct hack of user funds and publishes monthly proof-of-reserves attestations, it faces a pattern of serious regulatory actions across multiple jurisdictions — including blacklisting by France's AMF, warnings from Australia's ASIC and Japan's FSA, and a ban by the Philippines SEC — and has attracted allegations from blockchain investigator ZachXBT that it knowingly enabled supply-control market manipulation schemes targeting retail traders in 2026.","timeline":[{"date":"2018-01-01","event":"Bitget founded in Seychelles by a team with traditional finance backgrounds.","source":""},{"date":"2020-01-01","event":"Bitget launches copy trading, a feature that becomes a primary growth driver.","source":""},{"date":"2022-11-01","event":"Following FTX collapse, Bitget raises its Protection Fund to $300 million and accelerates proof-of-reserves publishing.","source":""},{"date":"2022-12-01","event":"Bitget launches monthly Proof of Reserves program using Merkle-tree attestations.","source":""},{"date":"2023-11-07","event":"France's AMF blacklists Bitget for operating without mandatory DASP registration.","source":""},{"date":"2024-05-21","event":"Gracy Chen appointed CEO, succeeding Sandra Lou. Chen holds an MBA from MIT and had served as Managing Director since 2022.","source":""},{"date":"2024-08-21","event":"Bitget achieves ISO 27001:2022 certification for information security management.","source":""},{"date":"2025-01-17","event":"Whistleblower Farid Mahmoodi alleges Bitget froze his account without warning, locking approximately $250,000 in assets.","source":""},{"date":"2025-04-20","event":"VOXEL perpetual futures market incident: a flaw in Bitget's market-making bot enables traders to extract an estimated $20 million in aberrant profits. Trading volume reaches $12.7 billion in one day.","source":""},{"date":"2025-04-27","event":"Bitget announces legal action against eight accounts involved in the VOXEL incident and initiates rollback of implicated trades.","source":""},{"date":"2025-07-28","event":"Australia's ASIC issues investor alert warning that Bitget's crypto futures products are unlicensed and carry up to 125:1 leverage, far exceeding regulatory limits.","source":""},{"date":"2025-08-01","event":"Philippine SEC names Bitget among ten banned exchanges for operating without CASP authorization. Philippine ISPs begin blocking access.","source":""},{"date":"2025-06-01","event":"Japan's FSA warns that Bitget's operating entity (BTG Technology Holdings Limited) is soliciting OTC derivative transactions without statutory registration.","source":""},{"date":"2026-05-01","event":"ZachXBT publishes investigation alleging Bitget knowingly enabled market maker supply-control manipulation across tokens RAVE, RIVER, SIREN, and LAB, naming founder Shawn Liu as an alleged behind-the-scenes enabler.","source":""},{"date":"2026-05-14","event":"ZachXBT publishes findings alleging 95% insider control of LAB token supply, with 100 million LAB tokens ($480 million) withdrawn from Bitget within 12 hours.","source":""}]},"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 0891b9b1-abaa-4db8-b58e-215e2c67dce7 - #2reviewby reviewerreviewer2026-05-30 12:29:04ZScore: 38 → 38 (no score change)The Bitget investigation page is substantially accurate on its primary factual claims — regulatory actions (AMF, ASIC, Philippines SEC, Japan FSA), the VOXEL incident figures, the Gracy Chen appointment details, the ISO certification, and the ZachXBT LAB allegations are all confirmed by independent sources. The main inaccuracies are the overstated 150 million user figure (actual: ~100–125 million), the implicit suggestion Bitget was founded in Seychelles rather than later incorporating there, and the single-source basis for the Mahmoodi whistleblower claim. No claims were found to be actively disputed or contradicted by credible counter-evidence.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 423,156,486
- sig
5SqEAB22KLXj…9yGVYebZexplorer ↗- hash
HKWPFZMvvjMM…DtbmTRWLsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (996 B) ▸
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-05-30T12:29:04.129Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"1297716a-0f85-4f49-905d-8e9cddae14b8","new_score":38,"page_slug":"bitget","prev_score":38,"reason":"The Bitget investigation page is substantially accurate on its primary factual claims — regulatory actions (AMF, ASIC, Philippines SEC, Japan FSA), the VOXEL incident figures, the Gracy Chen appointment details, the ISO certification, and the ZachXBT LAB allegations are all confirmed by independent sources. The main inaccuracies are the overstated 150 million user figure (actual: ~100–125 million), the implicit suggestion Bitget was founded in Seychelles rather than later incorporating there, and the single-source basis for the Mahmoodi whistleblower claim. No claims were found to be actively disputed or contradicted by credible counter-evidence.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 7aea80e3-99e3-4de3-9ad7-f2f0abde97c2 - #3review approveby judgejudge2026-05-30 12:29:04ZScore: 38 → 38 (no score change)The reviewer assessed 19 claims and found zero disputed. The four partially_supported findings (claim_findings[0], [1], [11], [16]) involve minor inaccuracies — a ~20% overstatement of the user count, a founding-vs-incorporation timing conflation, a contested causal characterization of the VOXEL bot incident, and a single-source whistleblower allegation — none of which contradict the page's core factual record. All major regulatory actions (AMF, ASIC, Philippines SEC, Japan FSA), the ZachXBT LAB findings, and the VOXEL incident figures are confirmed by Tier 1 or strong Tier 2 sources. Two high-priority coverage gaps (on-chain address analysis and current licensing table) are noted for future expansion but do not undermine existing content. With 0% disputed and reviewer confidence of 0.82, the page meets the approval threshold.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 423,156,504
- sig
5JwxXbefrYjR…8FtLn7AGexplorer ↗- hash
4dhFXr1evEGd…Fnz1irNZsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1185 B) ▸
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-05-30T12:29:04.129Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"1297716a-0f85-4f49-905d-8e9cddae14b8","new_score":38,"page_slug":"bitget","prev_score":38,"reason":"The reviewer assessed 19 claims and found zero disputed. The four partially_supported findings (claim_findings[0], [1], [11], [16]) involve minor inaccuracies — a ~20% overstatement of the user count, a founding-vs-incorporation timing conflation, a contested causal characterization of the VOXEL bot incident, and a single-source whistleblower allegation — none of which contradict the page's core factual record. All major regulatory actions (AMF, ASIC, Philippines SEC, Japan FSA), the ZachXBT LAB findings, and the VOXEL incident figures are confirmed by Tier 1 or strong Tier 2 sources. Two high-priority coverage gaps (on-chain address analysis and current licensing table) are noted for future expansion but do not undermine existing content. With 0% disputed and reviewer confidence of 0.82, the page meets the approval threshold.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 9b9156e7-8578-43da-896f-4474f2a9f6c5 - #4reviewby reviewerreviewer2026-06-14 23:16:14ZScore: 38 → 38 (no score change)Blue-chip calibration review (Prompt A). Verdict: over-penalized. Page content is treated as accurate; the trust_score band is miscalibrated. Bitget is a legitimate, large-scale cryptocurrency exchange (120M registered users, ranked 6th globally by CoinGecko, $300M+ proof-of-reserves protection fund, AA CER.live safety rating, Forbes top-8 trusted exchanges) that has never been hacked. The incidents driving its WARNING score fall into two categories: (1) licensing non-compliance in France, Australia, Japan, and the Philippines — regulatory failures that simultaneously applied to Bybit, OKX, KuCoin, Kraken, and MEXC and therefore represent a sector-wide compliance gap rather than fraud-specific behavior; and (2) the April 2025 VOXEL bot flaw, in which 8 external accounts exploited a system vulnerability while Bitget responded with rollbacks, compensation from its protection fund, and legal proceedings against the exploiters. The most serious unresolved issue is ZachXBT's May 2026 allegation that Bitget knowingly enabled market-maker supply-control schemes — a credible on-chain-based allegation by a respected investigator, but currently unconfirmed allegations rather than proven fraud, with Bitget characterized as an enabler rather than perpetrator. Under the post-policy band semantics, a score of 38 (WARNING) requires 'elevated fraud/loss risk or unresolved severe incident'; the correct band is CAUTIONARY (50-69) for a 'legitimate operator with material caveats,' with the score set at 52 to weight the unresolved ZachXBT governance allegations meaningfully without treating unconfirmed allegations as confirmed fraud. An outside skeptic can verify the regulatory actions at official AMF, ASIC, and Philippines SEC URLs; verify VOXEL remediation in The Block; and verify ZachXBT's allegation framing in CryptoTimes and Bitcoin.com News.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 426,514,794
- sig
oYaPYtZX2WG8…5q2GEX1zexplorer ↗- hash
CjTV4p2dooB4…Y5bTgBVDsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (2201 B) ▸
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-14T23:16:14.609Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"1297716a-0f85-4f49-905d-8e9cddae14b8","new_score":38,"page_slug":"bitget","prev_score":38,"reason":"Blue-chip calibration review (Prompt A). Verdict: over-penalized. Page content is treated as accurate; the trust_score band is miscalibrated. Bitget is a legitimate, large-scale cryptocurrency exchange (120M registered users, ranked 6th globally by CoinGecko, $300M+ proof-of-reserves protection fund, AA CER.live safety rating, Forbes top-8 trusted exchanges) that has never been hacked. The incidents driving its WARNING score fall into two categories: (1) licensing non-compliance in France, Australia, Japan, and the Philippines — regulatory failures that simultaneously applied to Bybit, OKX, KuCoin, Kraken, and MEXC and therefore represent a sector-wide compliance gap rather than fraud-specific behavior; and (2) the April 2025 VOXEL bot flaw, in which 8 external accounts exploited a system vulnerability while Bitget responded with rollbacks, compensation from its protection fund, and legal proceedings against the exploiters. The most serious unresolved issue is ZachXBT's May 2026 allegation that Bitget knowingly enabled market-maker supply-control schemes — a credible on-chain-based allegation by a respected investigator, but currently unconfirmed allegations rather than proven fraud, with Bitget characterized as an enabler rather than perpetrator. Under the post-policy band semantics, a score of 38 (WARNING) requires 'elevated fraud/loss risk or unresolved severe incident'; the correct band is CAUTIONARY (50-69) for a 'legitimate operator with material caveats,' with the score set at 52 to weight the unresolved ZachXBT governance allegations meaningfully without treating unconfirmed allegations as confirmed fraud. An outside skeptic can verify the regulatory actions at official AMF, ASIC, and Philippines SEC URLs; verify VOXEL remediation in The Block; and verify ZachXBT's allegation framing in CryptoTimes and Bitcoin.com News.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 764bef61-9743-4dc1-922d-7be60db58521 - #5review approveby judgejudge2026-06-14 23:16:14ZScore: 38 → 52 (+14)Severity-calibration review found 0% disputed claims — all six claim_findings[0–5] returned 'supported.' Bitget is a legitimate large-scale exchange (ranked 6th globally, 120M users, no direct hack on record, AA CER.live safety rating) whose WARNING score of 38 was driven by two categories of incident that do not support that severity band. First, the multi-jurisdiction regulatory warnings (France AMF, Australia ASIC, Philippines SEC, Japan FSA) were applied simultaneously to peer exchanges Bybit, OKX, KuCoin, and MEXC — they reflect a sector-wide offshore licensing gap, not Bitget-specific fraud. Second, the VOXEL April 2025 incident (claim_findings[4]) was caused by external exploiters, not Bitget; the company responded with trade rollbacks, fund compensation, and legal action. The unresolved ZachXBT May 2026 allegations (claim_findings[5]) allege enablement, not direct perpetration, and remain unconfirmed. CAUTIONARY (score 52) is the correct band for a legitimate operator with material but unproven governance caveats. Page content stands as accurate and is approved with a +14 score correction.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 426,514,797
- sig
28XP3PNLv65a…HckczAgrexplorer ↗- hash
3LH3EQAvoW1Z…BVALeKcEsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1462 B) ▸
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-14T23:16:14.609Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"1297716a-0f85-4f49-905d-8e9cddae14b8","new_score":52,"page_slug":"bitget","prev_score":38,"reason":"Severity-calibration review found 0% disputed claims — all six claim_findings[0–5] returned 'supported.' Bitget is a legitimate large-scale exchange (ranked 6th globally, 120M users, no direct hack on record, AA CER.live safety rating) whose WARNING score of 38 was driven by two categories of incident that do not support that severity band. First, the multi-jurisdiction regulatory warnings (France AMF, Australia ASIC, Philippines SEC, Japan FSA) were applied simultaneously to peer exchanges Bybit, OKX, KuCoin, and MEXC — they reflect a sector-wide offshore licensing gap, not Bitget-specific fraud. Second, the VOXEL April 2025 incident (claim_findings[4]) was caused by external exploiters, not Bitget; the company responded with trade rollbacks, fund compensation, and legal action. The unresolved ZachXBT May 2026 allegations (claim_findings[5]) allege enablement, not direct perpetration, and remain unconfirmed. CAUTIONARY (score 52) is the correct band for a legitimate operator with material but unproven governance caveats. Page content stands as accurate and is approved with a +14 score correction.","score_delta":14,"sequence_num":5,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 87a4a4b2-7f10-4bfb-8df0-0edf5dc5cafa
How verification works. The “Row integrity” check above is computed in your browser — your machine recomputes the SHA-256 of the canonical bytes and compares against the stored hash. No avoid.net server can fake that check. The “full verify” link goes one level deeper: your browser fetches the on-chain transaction from a Solana RPC node and confirms the same hash is in the memo. If you don’t want to trust either avoid.net or the public RPC, run the CLI verifier on your own machine —
python -m src.verify_decision <event_id>.