Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← Bit.com10 decisions on this page

Audit log

Every state-changing event for Bit.com: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.

  1. #1publishby system:backfill
    2026-06-07 22:10:49Z
    Score: ? → ? (no score change)
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 424,981,566
    sig
    5odGynRvPJCz…7npCeAS6explorer ↗
    hash
    5TuCyDSwd6oH…znUhNqzasha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (26365 B) ▸
    {"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"cc3fbcec-6e6a-4760-96d9-3cb179d61864","kind":"publish","page_slug":"bit-com","published_at":"2026-06-07T22:10:49.589Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"Bit.com","sections":[{"content":"Bit.com was launched on August 3, 2020, as a cryptocurrency derivatives exchange operated by Matrixport, a Singapore-headquartered digital asset financial services firm. Matrixport was founded in 2019 by Jihan Wu, the co-founder of Bitmain Technologies — the world's largest manufacturer of Bitcoin mining hardware — after Wu departed as co-CEO of Bitmain. The exchange was initially positioned as a derivatives-first platform offering BTC/USD perpetual swaps, then expanded to include futures, options, and spot trading across Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Bitcoin Cash (BCH). Bit.com claimed a notable early milestone as the first exchange to list BCH options. The platform also offered cloud mining hashrate products and structured yield products branded 'GoRich.' Matrixport itself operates a distinct wealth-management and institutional platform at matrixport.com; Bit.com (domain: bit.com; internal system domain: bitexch.io) functioned as its retail and professional trading arm. These are legally related entities, not independent operators. Matrixport achieved unicorn status with a valuation exceeding $1 billion and managed over $6 billion in assets as of its March 2026 rebrand announcement.","heading":"Entity Background and Corporate Structure","severity":"low","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Bitmain spin-off Matrixport is launching a crypto derivatives exchange — The Block","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.theblock.co/post/72970/matrixport-crypto-derivatives-exchange"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Singapore Based Digital Asset Firm Matrixport To Launch Bit.com — Crowdfund Insider","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.crowdfundinsider.com/2020/07/164643-singapore-based-digital-asset-firm-matrixport-to-launch-bit-com-a-crypto-derivatives-exchange/"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Matrixport Rebrands as BIT in Strategic Repositioning — PR Newswire (official press release)","type":"official","url":"https://www.prnewswire.com/apac/news-releases/matrixport-rebrands-as-bit-in-strategic-repositioning-302719048.html"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Jihan Wu — Wikipedia","type":"other","url":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihan_Wu"}]},{"content":"On December 27, 2025, Bit.com published a wind-down notice across its official social media channels and confirmed the announcement via email to users. The exchange described the action as part of a 'business restructuring plan.' No specific circumstances — regulatory, financial, or operational — were disclosed in the announcement or in subsequent follow-up communications obtained by secondary news outlets. The company framed the closure as an orderly reduction rather than an insolvency or forced shutdown. The exchange explicitly stated that user assets 'will not be cleared, confiscated, or otherwise disposed of,' and committed to a transparent, traceable migration window. The TheStreet characterized the shutdown as 'unexpected,' noting the platform had analyst support, while Cryptopolitan and MEXC News reported the event as a straightforward operational wind-down. No court filings, regulatory enforcement actions, or hack disclosures accompanied the announcement.","heading":"Shutdown Announcement and Stated Rationale","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Analyst-loved crypto exchange announces unexpected shutdown — TheStreet Crypto","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.thestreet.com/crypto/bankruptcy/crypto-exchange-announces-phased-shutdown-by-2026"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Crypto exchange Bit.com set to wind down operations — Cryptopolitan","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.cryptopolitan.com/bit-com-set-to-wind-down-operations/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Crypto exchange Bit.com set to wind down operations — MEXC News","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.mexc.com/news/358004"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Bit.com Announces Three-Phase Shutdown Plan to March 31, 2026 — KuCoin","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.kucoin.com/news/flash/bit-com-announces-three-phase-shutdown-plan-to-march-31-2026"}]},{"content":"The wind-down was structured in three phases. Phase 1 (effective December 27, 2025): new user registrations were immediately suspended; derivatives contract trading was restricted to closing existing positions only (no new positions permitted); and normal withdrawals remained available to existing users. Phase 2 (January 25–31, 2026): cloud mining (hashrate) services terminated January 25, 2026, with all mining income settled by that date; structured financial product income calculations ceased January 30, 2026, requiring users to manually withdraw assets from supported currencies; spot trading fully ceased January 31, 2026, after which all remaining non-USDT assets would be automatically converted to USDT at prevailing market prices (with the exception of tokens listed in the 'observation area,' which users were required to withdraw manually beforehand). Phase 3 — Backup Station (February 1–March 31, 2026): any assets not withdrawn by January 31 were transferred to a 'backup station' system. This system permitted login and withdrawal only; no trading functions were available. The exchange committed to 24/7 availability of asset inquiry and withdrawal functions during this period, with online ticket first-response times of one hour or less and resolution of asset-related anomalies within two hours. Users with large asset holdings could request one-on-one specialist support. After March 31, 2026: users who did not complete withdrawals during the backup window are required to contact Bit.com customer service individually through the backup station system to recover assets. The exchange stated assets remain preserved and have not been disposed of, but the self-service window closed on that date.","heading":"Phased Wind-Down Timeline and User Asset Procedures","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Bit.com Plans Gradual Shutdown by March 2026, Urges USDT Withdrawals — MEXC News","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.mexc.com/news/358163"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Bit.com begins phased shutdown, sets March 2026 deadline for withdrawals — MEXC News","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.mexc.co/news/357888"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Bit.com Announces Business Reduction and User Asset Migration Plan — KuCoin","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.kucoin.com/news/flash/bit-com-announces-business-reduction-and-user-asset-migration-plan"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Bit.com to shut down from Dec 27, 2025, with migration ending Mar 31, 2026 — BingX","type":"news_article","url":"https://bingx.com/en/news/post/bit-com-to-shut-down-from-dec-with-migration-ending-mar"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Follow-up Announcement on Business Adjustment and User Asset Migration — BIT Help Center (official)","type":"official","url":"https://helpcenter.bitexch.io/en/articles/13242121-follow-up-announcement-on-business-adjustment-and-user-asset-migration"}]},{"content":"Bit.com and Matrixport are related entities within the same corporate group. The exchange encouraged users to migrate assets to Matrixport as an alternative to direct withdrawal, positioning Matrixport as the successor platform for those who wished to continue using group services. On March 20, 2026 — concurrently with the tail end of Bit.com's backup withdrawal window — Matrixport formally rebranded as 'BIT' (standing for 'Bridge into Tomorrow'). The rebrand was announced via PR Newswire and covered by The Block, GlobeNewswire, and other outlets. The company stated that the rebrand affected only the brand name and did not alter client accounts, legal entities, or contractual arrangements. At the time of the rebrand, the entity reported over $6 billion in assets under management, more than $7 billion in monthly trading volume, and cumulative interest payments exceeding $2 billion to clients. BIT (formerly Matrixport) maintained licensed operations in Singapore, Hong Kong, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Bhutan, and was listed on the Hurun 2024 Global Unicorn Index. The timing of the Bit.com closure and the Matrixport-to-BIT rebrand, occurring within the same quarter, suggests a coordinated strategic consolidation: winding down the retail derivatives exchange brand while repositioning the parent entity toward institutional digital asset infrastructure under a unified brand. No official statement from either entity has explicitly confirmed this interpretation.","heading":"Relationship to Matrixport and BIT Rebrand","severity":"low","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"Matrixport Rebrands as BIT in Strategic Repositioning — PR Newswire (official)","type":"official","url":"https://www.prnewswire.com/apac/news-releases/matrixport-rebrands-as-bit-in-strategic-repositioning-302719048.html"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Matrixport Rebrands as BIT in Strategic Repositioning — The Block","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.theblock.co/press-releases/394343/matrixport-rebrands-as-bit-in-strategic-repositioning"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Matrixport Rebrands as BIT in Strategic Repositioning — GlobeNewswire","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/03/20/3259572/0/en/matrixport-rebrands-as-bit-in-strategic-repositioning.html"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Matrixport Rebrands as BIT — Matrixport Help Center (official)","type":"official","url":"https://helpcenter.matrixport.com/en/articles/14134478-matrixport-rebrands-as-bit"}]},{"content":"Users who failed to withdraw before March 31, 2026, face a degraded recovery path that requires submitting individual customer-service requests through the backup station system. While the exchange explicitly stated that assets would not be confiscated, the burden of initiating recovery shifts entirely to the user after the self-service window closes. Risks for affected users include: (1) delays in customer-service response given the volume of potential post-deadline claims; (2) uncertainty about the entity's continued operational capacity to honor recovery requests over an extended period, given the full exchange shutdown; (3) the absence of any time-bound guarantee for post-March-31 asset releases in publicly reported announcements. The exchange warned users during the migration period to be vigilant against fraud, noting that official communications never request passwords, verification codes, or private keys — implying that third-party scammers were already attempting to exploit the transition. No third-party audits or proof-of-reserves disclosures specifically covering the wind-down period were identified in available sources.","heading":"Customer Risk Assessment: Post-Deadline Asset Recovery","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Bit.com Plans Gradual Shutdown by March 2026, Urges USDT Withdrawals — MEXC News","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.mexc.com/news/358163"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Bit.com Announces Three-Phase Shutdown Plan to March 31, 2026 — KuCoin","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.kucoin.com/news/flash/bit-com-announces-three-phase-shutdown-plan-to-march-31-2026"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Analyst-loved crypto exchange announces unexpected shutdown — TheStreet Crypto","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.thestreet.com/crypto/bankruptcy/crypto-exchange-announces-phased-shutdown-by-2026"}]},{"content":"Available public sources — including searches across SEC EDGAR, court records, major crypto news outlets, and the exchange's own communications — do not identify any regulatory enforcement actions, license suspensions, security breaches, exit fraud, misappropriation of funds, or insolvency proceedings associated with Bit.com or its operator Matrixport at the time of the shutdown. The FX Empire 2025 review noted that Bit.com held a VASP license in Lithuania and described its security track record as clean. The exchange's closure was reported without fraud characterization by credible Tier-2 outlets including The Block, TheStreet, Cryptopolitan, and KuCoin News. Users and researchers should note the existence of numerous fraudulent exchanges using similar branding (e.g., bit-exchange.cc, bitex.com, bitexchange.systems), none of which are affiliated with the legitimate Bit.com platform operated by Matrixport. These similarly named scam platforms have been flagged by Trustpilot, ScamAdviser, and the British Columbia Securities Commission; they are entirely distinct entities.","heading":"Absence of Identified Regulatory, Fraud, or Security Incidents","severity":"low","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"BIT.com Review 2025: Is It the Right Exchange for You? — FX Empire","type":"research","url":"https://www.fxempire.com/exchanges/bit"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Bit.com Exchange Begins Wind-Down Amid Migration Plan — 1Token Tech Blog","type":"news_article","url":"https://blog.1token.tech/bit-com-exchange-begins-wind-down-amid-migration-plan/"}]},{"content":"Secondary reporting from MEXC News noted that Bit.com's total trading volume declined by approximately 51% year-over-year in the period leading up to the closure announcement, with activity tapering significantly by mid-2025 despite growth in the first quarter of that year. The exchange had previously been ranked as a top-tier derivatives venue, particularly in the BTC and ETH options market, during its peak years of 2021–2022. By 2024–2025, the global derivatives landscape had consolidated around a small number of dominant venues including Binance Futures, Bybit, and Deribit, with smaller operators experiencing significant market share erosion. Options trading on Bit.com was reportedly disabled in 2025 prior to the full shutdown announcement, suggesting a rolling reduction of services before the formal wind-down notice. This volume context is consistent with a voluntary strategic consolidation rather than an acute operational failure, though the precise internal reasons for the decision remain undisclosed.","heading":"Market Context and Trading Volume Decline","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Crypto exchange Bit.com set to wind down operations — MEXC News","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.mexc.com/news/358004"},{"credibility":2,"name":"BIT.com Review 2025 — FX Empire","type":"research","url":"https://www.fxempire.com/exchanges/bit"}]},{"content":"The entity under investigation is the Bit.com derivatives and spot exchange operated by Matrixport (domain: bit.com; internal help center at bitexch.io). This entity is distinct from: (1) BIT / Matrixport, the renamed parent wealth-management and institutional services platform (bit.com post-rebrand, matrixport.com); (2) bit-exchange.cc, identified by Trustpilot users as a pig-butchering scam; (3) bitex.com, a UAE-based exchange flagged by the British Columbia Securities Commission and Trustpilot users for withdrawal denials; (4) bitexchange.systems, rated 2.2 stars on Sitejabber with reports of withdrawal blocks and unresponsive support; (5) Bitcoin.com exchange, a separate entity. The similarity in naming between Bit.com and fraudulent 'bit-' prefix platforms creates meaningful social-engineering risk during the exchange's wind-down period, a risk the exchange itself acknowledged in its anti-fraud warnings.","heading":"Entity Disambiguation: Bit.com vs. Similarly Named Entities","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"Bit Exchange Reviews (bit-exchange.cc) — Trustpilot","type":"community_report","url":"https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.bit-exchange.cc"},{"credibility":3,"name":"BitExchange Reviews — Sitejabber","type":"community_report","url":"https://www.sitejabber.com/reviews/bitexchange.systems"},{"credibility":3,"name":"Bit.com Reviews — Trustpilot","type":"community_report","url":"https://www.trustpilot.com/review/bit.com"}]}],"sources_used":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Analyst-loved crypto exchange announces unexpected shutdown — TheStreet Crypto","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.thestreet.com/crypto/bankruptcy/crypto-exchange-announces-phased-shutdown-by-2026"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Crypto exchange Bit.com set to wind down operations — Cryptopolitan","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.cryptopolitan.com/bit-com-set-to-wind-down-operations/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Crypto exchange Bit.com set to wind down operations — MEXC News","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.mexc.com/news/358004"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Bit.com Plans Gradual Shutdown by March 2026, Urges USDT Withdrawals — MEXC News","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.mexc.com/news/358163"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Bit.com begins phased shutdown, sets March 2026 deadline for withdrawals — MEXC News","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.mexc.co/news/357888"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Bit.com Announces Three-Phase Shutdown Plan to March 31, 2026 — KuCoin","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.kucoin.com/news/flash/bit-com-announces-three-phase-shutdown-plan-to-march-31-2026"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Bit.com Announces Business Reduction and User Asset Migration Plan — KuCoin","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.kucoin.com/news/flash/bit-com-announces-business-reduction-and-user-asset-migration-plan"},{"credibility":2,"name":"BIT Announces Phased Business Reduction and User Asset Migration Plan — KuCoin","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.kucoin.com/news/flash/bit-announces-phased-business-reduction-and-user-asset-migration-plan"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Bit.com Plans Shutdown with User Asset Migration — MEXC News (PH)","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.mexc.co/en-PH/news/360487"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Bit.com to shut down from Dec 27, 2025, with migration ending Mar 31, 2026 — BingX","type":"news_article","url":"https://bingx.com/en/news/post/bit-com-to-shut-down-from-dec-with-migration-ending-mar"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Follow-up Announcement on Business Adjustment and User Asset Migration — BIT Help Center (official)","type":"official","url":"https://helpcenter.bitexch.io/en/articles/13242121-follow-up-announcement-on-business-adjustment-and-user-asset-migration"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Matrixport Rebrands as BIT in Strategic Repositioning — PR Newswire (official press release)","type":"official","url":"https://www.prnewswire.com/apac/news-releases/matrixport-rebrands-as-bit-in-strategic-repositioning-302719048.html"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Matrixport Rebrands as BIT in Strategic Repositioning — The Block","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.theblock.co/press-releases/394343/matrixport-rebrands-as-bit-in-strategic-repositioning"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Matrixport Rebrands as BIT in Strategic Repositioning — GlobeNewswire","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/03/20/3259572/0/en/matrixport-rebrands-as-bit-in-strategic-repositioning.html"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Matrixport Rebrands as BIT — Matrixport Help Center (official)","type":"official","url":"https://helpcenter.matrixport.com/en/articles/14134478-matrixport-rebrands-as-bit"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Bitmain spin-off Matrixport is launching a crypto derivatives exchange — The Block","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.theblock.co/post/72970/matrixport-crypto-derivatives-exchange"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Singapore Based Digital Asset Firm Matrixport To Launch Bit.com — Crowdfund Insider","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.crowdfundinsider.com/2020/07/164643-singapore-based-digital-asset-firm-matrixport-to-launch-bit-com-a-crypto-derivatives-exchange/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Leading Crypto Derivatives Exchange Bit.com Set to Launch Bitcoin Cash Options — Bitcoin.com News","type":"news_article","url":"https://news.bitcoin.com/leading-crypto-derivatives-exchange-bit-com-set-to-launch-bitcoin-cash-options/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Jihan Wu — Wikipedia","type":"other","url":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihan_Wu"},{"credibility":2,"name":"BIT.com Review 2025: Is It the Right Exchange for You? — FX Empire","type":"research","url":"https://www.fxempire.com/exchanges/bit"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Bit.com Exchange Begins Wind-Down Amid Migration Plan — 1Token Tech Blog","type":"news_article","url":"https://blog.1token.tech/bit-com-exchange-begins-wind-down-amid-migration-plan/"},{"credibility":3,"name":"Bit.com Reviews — Trustpilot","type":"community_report","url":"https://www.trustpilot.com/review/bit.com"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Jihan Wu's Matrix Finance offers $200 million credit facility to Bitdeer — The Block","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.theblock.co/post/351587/jihan-wus-matrix-finance-offers-200-million-credit-facility-to-jihan-wus-bitdeer-bitcoin-mining-operation"}],"summary":"Bit.com was a cryptocurrency derivatives and spot exchange launched in August 2020 by Matrixport, a Singapore-based digital asset firm founded by Bitmain co-founder Jihan Wu. On December 27, 2025, the exchange announced a phased wind-down under the label 'business restructuring,' with spot trading ceasing January 31, 2026, a backup withdrawal-only station active through March 31, 2026, and post-deadline asset recovery requiring individual customer-service requests. No regulatory action, security breach, or insolvency has been publicly reported as the cause; the shutdown appears consistent with a broader strategic consolidation by Matrixport, which rebranded as 'BIT' on March 20, 2026.","timeline":[{"date":"2019-01-01","event":"Jihan Wu, co-founder of Bitmain, departs as co-CEO and founds Matrixport, a Singapore-based digital asset financial services firm.","source":"Jihan Wu — Wikipedia","source_url":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihan_Wu"},{"date":"2020-07-01","event":"Matrixport announces plans to launch Bit.com, a dedicated cryptocurrency derivatives exchange, to offer BTC/USD perpetual swaps and options.","source":"Bitmain spin-off Matrixport is launching a crypto derivatives exchange — The Block","source_url":"https://www.theblock.co/post/72970/matrixport-crypto-derivatives-exchange"},{"date":"2020-08-03","event":"Bit.com officially launches with a BTC/USD perpetual swap product.","source":"Singapore Based Digital Asset Firm Matrixport To Launch Bit.com — Crowdfund Insider","source_url":"https://www.crowdfundinsider.com/2020/07/164643-singapore-based-digital-asset-firm-matrixport-to-launch-bit-com-a-crypto-derivatives-exchange/"},{"date":"2020-08-17","event":"Bit.com launches BTC options trading, later expanding to ETH and BCH options, claiming to be the first exchange to list BCH options.","source":"Leading Crypto Derivatives Exchange Bit.com Set to Launch Bitcoin Cash Options — Bitcoin.com News","source_url":"https://news.bitcoin.com/leading-crypto-derivatives-exchange-bit-com-set-to-launch-bitcoin-cash-options/"},{"date":"2025-01-01","event":"Options trading is reportedly disabled on Bit.com, representing a significant reduction of services ahead of the formal shutdown announcement.","source":"BIT.com Review 2025 — FX Empire","source_url":"https://www.fxempire.com/exchanges/bit"},{"date":"2025-12-27","event":"Bit.com publishes a formal wind-down notice via social media and email, citing 'business restructuring.' New user registrations suspended immediately; derivatives trading restricted to closing existing positions only.","source":"Crypto exchange Bit.com set to wind down operations — Cryptopolitan","source_url":"https://www.cryptopolitan.com/bit-com-set-to-wind-down-operations/"},{"date":"2026-01-07","event":"Bit.com publishes a follow-up announcement with detailed asset migration procedures and backup station system specifications.","source":"Bit.com Exchange Begins Wind-Down Amid Migration Plan — 1Token Tech Blog","source_url":"https://blog.1token.tech/bit-com-exchange-begins-wind-down-amid-migration-plan/"},{"date":"2026-01-25","event":"Cloud mining (hashrate) services on Bit.com terminate; all pending mining income settled by this date.","source":"Bit.com Plans Gradual Shutdown by March 2026 — MEXC News","source_url":"https://www.mexc.com/news/358163"},{"date":"2026-01-30","event":"Structured financial product (GoRich) income calculations cease; users required to manually withdraw assets from supported currencies.","source":"Analyst-loved crypto exchange announces unexpected shutdown — TheStreet Crypto","source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/crypto/bankruptcy/crypto-exchange-announces-phased-shutdown-by-2026"},{"date":"2026-01-31","event":"Spot trading fully ceases on Bit.com. Remaining non-USDT assets automatically converted to USDT at closing prices. Primary withdrawal window via main platform ends.","source":"Bit.com Announces Three-Phase Shutdown Plan to March 31, 2026 — KuCoin","source_url":"https://www.kucoin.com/news/flash/bit-com-announces-three-phase-shutdown-plan-to-march-31-2026"},{"date":"2026-02-01","event":"Backup Station system activates. All remaining user assets transferred to backup station; login and withdrawal functions only. 24/7 customer support with one-hour ticket response commitment.","source":"Bit.com begins phased shutdown, sets March 2026 deadline for withdrawals — MEXC News","source_url":"https://www.mexc.co/news/357888"},{"date":"2026-03-20","event":"Matrixport formally rebrands as 'BIT' (Bridge into Tomorrow), announced via PR Newswire. The company states the rebrand does not affect client accounts or legal entities. BIT reports $6 billion in assets under management and $7 billion in monthly trading volume.","source":"Matrixport Rebrands as BIT in Strategic Repositioning — PR Newswire","source_url":"https://www.prnewswire.com/apac/news-releases/matrixport-rebrands-as-bit-in-strategic-repositioning-302719048.html"},{"date":"2026-03-31","event":"Backup Station self-service withdrawal window closes. After this date, asset recovery requires individual customer-service requests submitted through the Backup Station system. Exchange states assets remain preserved and will not be disposed of.","source":"Bit.com Plans Shutdown with User Asset Migration — MEXC News","source_url":"https://www.mexc.co/en-PH/news/360487"}]},"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 3c24c9c2-bd7e-43b6-9242-00937aa7eaa0
  2. #2reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-06-09 22:00:32Z
    Score: 52 → 52 (no score change)
    The core narrative — that Bit.com was a legitimate Matrixport-operated exchange that conducted an orderly wind-down in late 2025/early 2026, with Matrixport subsequently rebranding as BIT — is well-supported by multiple independent sources. The primary weakness is a material inaccuracy in the disambiguation section where 'bitex.com' is attributed to a BCSC warning that actually pertains to 'bestbitex.com,' a different entity. Additionally, the widely-cited 51% year-over-year volume decline figure could not be traced to the cited sources, and the official BIT help-center URL is inaccessible. Several claims are unverifiable rather than disputed, reflecting citation-level gaps rather than contradictory evidence.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 425,414,164
    sig
    EP4Xx2adVamm…LmZpVbVMexplorer ↗
    hash
    G9x7YoisXs9Z…NWsByXwssha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1061 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-09T22:00:32.462Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"cc3fbcec-6e6a-4760-96d9-3cb179d61864","new_score":52,"page_slug":"bit-com","prev_score":52,"reason":"The core narrative — that Bit.com was a legitimate Matrixport-operated exchange that conducted an orderly wind-down in late 2025/early 2026, with Matrixport subsequently rebranding as BIT — is well-supported by multiple independent sources. The primary weakness is a material inaccuracy in the disambiguation section where 'bitex.com' is attributed to a BCSC warning that actually pertains to 'bestbitex.com,' a different entity. Additionally, the widely-cited 51% year-over-year volume decline figure could not be traced to the cited sources, and the official BIT help-center URL is inaccessible. Several claims are unverifiable rather than disputed, reflecting citation-level gaps rather than contradictory evidence.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 02a02d68-45dd-4fe0-a0c6-fc7c9f7f05b1
  3. #3review reviseby judgejudge
    2026-06-09 22:00:32Z
    Score: 52 → 42 (-10)
    The core narrative — that Bit.com was a legitimate Matrixport-operated exchange that conducted an orderly phased wind-down in late 2025 through March 2026, followed by Matrixport rebranding as BIT — is well-supported by multiple independent sources and remains credible. However, the review identified a concrete factual error in the disambiguation section: claim_findings[19] found that the entity flagged by the British Columbia Securities Commission is 'bestbitex.com,' not 'bitex.com' as the page states, and no UAE attribution was found at the cited BCSC URL. Additionally, claim_findings[15] found that the cited 51% year-over-year trading volume decline figure does not appear in the sources attributed to it (MEXC News 358004, FX Empire), making this a materially unsupported data point. Two high-priority coverage gaps remain open: post-March-31 user recovery outcomes and community reports on actual wind-down experiences, both of which may now be resolvable given the June 2026 review date.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 425,414,167
    sig
    4hHJDaecK9Xa…PF1tXquRexplorer ↗
    hash
    HXY9kgZFEz78…GSCsVFCzsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1350 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-09T22:00:32.462Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"cc3fbcec-6e6a-4760-96d9-3cb179d61864","new_score":42,"page_slug":"bit-com","prev_score":52,"reason":"The core narrative — that Bit.com was a legitimate Matrixport-operated exchange that conducted an orderly phased wind-down in late 2025 through March 2026, followed by Matrixport rebranding as BIT — is well-supported by multiple independent sources and remains credible. However, the review identified a concrete factual error in the disambiguation section: claim_findings[19] found that the entity flagged by the British Columbia Securities Commission is 'bestbitex.com,' not 'bitex.com' as the page states, and no UAE attribution was found at the cited BCSC URL. Additionally, claim_findings[15] found that the cited 51% year-over-year trading volume decline figure does not appear in the sources attributed to it (MEXC News 358004, FX Empire), making this a materially unsupported data point. Two high-priority coverage gaps remain open: post-March-31 user recovery outcomes and community reports on actual wind-down experiences, both of which may now be resolvable given the June 2026 review date.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 8fad7e84-a5e1-4ef3-91f3-170956e9677d
  4. #4reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-08-19 04:00:07Z
    Score: 42 → 42 (no score change)
    The page's core factual scaffolding (launch date, corporate structure, wind-down timeline, rebrand details, absence of fraud/regulatory findings) is well-supported by primary and Tier-2 sources independently re-verified in this review. Two citations exhibit link rot (the official bitexch.io help-center SLA details, and an mexc.com volume-decline statistic), and a handful of secondary claims (TheStreet framing, bit-exchange.cc scam characterization, bitex.com/BCSC claim) could not be re-verified due to source blocking or search budget limits — these are gaps in verification, not contradictions. Notably, the page is unusually well-hedged: it does not assert fraud, does not conflate Bit.com with unrelated scam platforms, and explicitly labels its own 'coordinated consolidation' theory as unconfirmed inference. The largest substantive gap is forward-looking: the self-service withdrawal deadline passed roughly 4.5 months before this review, and no post-deadline outcome reporting (successful recoveries vs. stuck-fund complaints) was found or cited, which is the key missing data point for confidently placing this entity above WARNING.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 443,509,236
    sig
    j5jFsZYiryJn…3xSW2BKvexplorer ↗
    hash
    3aVy3DBJQtSM…yCXQ8FqLsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1488 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-19T04:00:07.574Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"cc3fbcec-6e6a-4760-96d9-3cb179d61864","new_score":42,"page_slug":"bit-com","prev_score":42,"reason":"The page's core factual scaffolding (launch date, corporate structure, wind-down timeline, rebrand details, absence of fraud/regulatory findings) is well-supported by primary and Tier-2 sources independently re-verified in this review. Two citations exhibit link rot (the official bitexch.io help-center SLA details, and an mexc.com volume-decline statistic), and a handful of secondary claims (TheStreet framing, bit-exchange.cc scam characterization, bitex.com/BCSC claim) could not be re-verified due to source blocking or search budget limits — these are gaps in verification, not contradictions. Notably, the page is unusually well-hedged: it does not assert fraud, does not conflate Bit.com with unrelated scam platforms, and explicitly labels its own 'coordinated consolidation' theory as unconfirmed inference. The largest substantive gap is forward-looking: the self-service withdrawal deadline passed roughly 4.5 months before this review, and no post-deadline outcome reporting (successful recoveries vs. stuck-fund complaints) was found or cited, which is the key missing data point for confidently placing this entity above WARNING.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 3055486d-a4ad-4868-81bd-447bc9b418a9
  5. #5review approve with notesby judgejudge
    2026-08-19 04:00:07Z
    Score: 42 → 56 (+14)
    Every claim the reviewer independently checked held up: launch history, corporate structure, the phased wind-down timeline, the Matrixport-to-BIT rebrand figures, and — most importantly for the score — the absence of any regulatory action, hack, exit fraud, or misappropriation tied to Bit.com's closure (claim_findings[0-3,5-8,12-13], disputed_pct 0.2 driven entirely by link_rot/unverifiable, not by contradiction). A current score of 42 (WARNING) implies own-entity fraud or negligence that no source reviewed supports; the wind-down was voluntary, disclosed, phased, and paired with an explicit no-confiscation commitment. That said, VERIFIED is not earned either: the exchange never published proof-of-reserves, one of the two SLA-commitment sources has gone dark (claim_findings[4]), and — per coverage_gaps[0] — no post-deadline reporting exists on whether backup-station recovery actually worked roughly 4.5 months after the March 31, 2026 deadline. That is a live, unresolved custody caveat, not a resolved clean record, which is exactly what the CAUTIONARY band (legit with caveats) is for. Notes: (Replace or archive-link the dead helpcenter.bitexch.io SLA source (1hr/2hr response commitments) — currently unverifiable from a live source.) (Replace or archive-link the dead mexc.com/news/358004 source backing the 51% YoY volume-decline figure.) (Add coverage of post-March-31-2026 outcome reporting (Trustpilot/Reddit/X complaints, successful vs. stuck recoveries) before the next review pass — this is the single highest-value gap per the reviewer.) (Confirm or drop the bitex.com/BCSC sub-claim, which currently has no cited source at all.) (Consider noting FX Empire's low third-party trust ratings (Cer.Live D, CryptoCompare C) alongside the 'clean security track record' claim for balance.)
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 443,509,243
    sig
    3aRXrtqeS5CQ…Pfw1ewsTexplorer ↗
    hash
    97QeA5hFuNN4…aB6fcaJWsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (2168 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-19T04:00:07.574Z","decision":"review_approve_with_notes","investigation_id":"cc3fbcec-6e6a-4760-96d9-3cb179d61864","new_score":56,"page_slug":"bit-com","prev_score":42,"reason":"Every claim the reviewer independently checked held up: launch history, corporate structure, the phased wind-down timeline, the Matrixport-to-BIT rebrand figures, and — most importantly for the score — the absence of any regulatory action, hack, exit fraud, or misappropriation tied to Bit.com's closure (claim_findings[0-3,5-8,12-13], disputed_pct 0.2 driven entirely by link_rot/unverifiable, not by contradiction). A current score of 42 (WARNING) implies own-entity fraud or negligence that no source reviewed supports; the wind-down was voluntary, disclosed, phased, and paired with an explicit no-confiscation commitment. That said, VERIFIED is not earned either: the exchange never published proof-of-reserves, one of the two SLA-commitment sources has gone dark (claim_findings[4]), and — per coverage_gaps[0] — no post-deadline reporting exists on whether backup-station recovery actually worked roughly 4.5 months after the March 31, 2026 deadline. That is a live, unresolved custody caveat, not a resolved clean record, which is exactly what the CAUTIONARY band (legit with caveats) is for. Notes: (Replace or archive-link the dead helpcenter.bitexch.io SLA source (1hr/2hr response commitments) — currently unverifiable from a live source.) (Replace or archive-link the dead mexc.com/news/358004 source backing the 51% YoY volume-decline figure.) (Add coverage of post-March-31-2026 outcome reporting (Trustpilot/Reddit/X complaints, successful vs. stuck recoveries) before the next review pass — this is the single highest-value gap per the reviewer.) (Confirm or drop the bitex.com/BCSC sub-claim, which currently has no cited source at all.) (Consider noting FX Empire's low third-party trust ratings (Cer.Live D, CryptoCompare C) alongside the 'clean security track record' claim for balance.)","score_delta":14,"sequence_num":5,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision c9953fe6-d482-4397-a726-68cc5cb17cd1
  6. #6reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-09-26 05:26:14Z
    Score: 62 → 62 (no score change)
    The large majority of factual claims on this page hold up well against primary and independent sources: the corporate history, funding rounds, exchange launch and market-position figures, fee schedules, the shutdown timeline, the Matrixport ETF-report controversy, the 2023 layoffs, and the current BIT licensing footprint were all independently confirmed, several via direct fetch of the cited sources. The page's most significant defect is an omission rather than an error: it does not mention the 2022-2023 Roger Ver v. Smart Vega Holding Limited (Bit.com) Seychelles lawsuit, in which Ver alleges the exchange wrongfully withheld $8 million of his funds. This directly undercuts the summary's claim that 'no fraud allegations ... have been identified against the exchange itself' and the Security section's claim of 'no ... theft of user funds,' both of which should be qualified. A handful of other claims (exact ETF-crash liquidation/price figures, the FXEmpire review date) show minor, non-material numeric drift against the range of contemporaneous reporting. No evidence was found contradicting the page's central narrative that Bit.com's 2025-2026 closure was an orderly restructuring rather than a fraud-driven collapse, and no accepted community submissions existed to independently spot-check.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 450,579,989
    sig
    fpyz3Cnzi3dh…ddWX2xPhexplorer ↗
    hash
    HdqrEa6kwSUD…QMFGVTrUsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1899 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"2c85125a79a7ed8a1913cdf80439d5d4","decided_at":"2026-09-26T05:26:14.216Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.0909,"findings_hash":"J3azEwyDGtXpCDewR8G3AfNd6JogtYxNB9gXskBgLw58","investigation_id":"cc3fbcec-6e6a-4760-96d9-3cb179d61864","mode":"findings_only","new_score":62,"page_content_hash":"1b01af38ee62472de8898c531b09b0b87ae95569455fc3729afab2e32910bb99","page_slug":"bit-com","prev_score":62,"reason":"The large majority of factual claims on this page hold up well against primary and independent sources: the corporate history, funding rounds, exchange launch and market-position figures, fee schedules, the shutdown timeline, the Matrixport ETF-report controversy, the 2023 layoffs, and the current BIT licensing footprint were all independently confirmed, several via direct fetch of the cited sources. The page's most significant defect is an omission rather than an error: it does not mention the 2022-2023 Roger Ver v. Smart Vega Holding Limited (Bit.com) Seychelles lawsuit, in which Ver alleges the exchange wrongfully withheld $8 million of his funds. This directly undercuts the summary's claim that 'no fraud allegations ... have been identified against the exchange itself' and the Security section's claim of 'no ... theft of user funds,' both of which should be qualified. A handful of other claims (exact ETF-crash liquidation/price figures, the FXEmpire review date) show minor, non-material numeric drift against the range of contemporaneous reporting. No evidence was found contradicting the page's central narrative that Bit.com's 2025-2026 closure was an orderly restructuring rather than a fraud-driven collapse, and no accepted community submissions existed to independently spot-check.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":6,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 4c866b6b-3fe8-4965-94a6-ccc4b75bdd22
  7. #7reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-10-27 07:10:22Z
    Score: 62 → 62 (no score change)
    The shutdown timeline (announcement Dec 27, 2025, spot end Jan 31, final date Mar 31) and the Series C details are supported. Completion on March 31 is asserted as fact but sources only describe a plan. The Series C-II, rebrand and licence figures, and the 'orderly' characterization could not be verified; the GlobeNewswire release was blocked. The page correctly reports the shutdown and no hack or enforcement was found. Many claims (fees, pair counts, ratings, Seychelles incorporation) were not individually checked.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 461,980,846
    sig
    SdUhbDLfHeZC…Xs5pT5Zsexplorer ↗
    hash
    Gru3vR6FZbFZ…FvU2yrqYsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1402 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"89ce8e3678d075f0cc634f003a327ea4","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T07:10:21.764Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.25,"findings_hash":"BWeMCHdRFiN4dtMi7utTXSSK7y2m5y1gi8JH89eckc6k","investigation_id":"cc3fbcec-6e6a-4760-96d9-3cb179d61864","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":62,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"1b01af38ee62472de8898c531b09b0b87ae95569455fc3729afab2e32910bb99","page_slug":"bit-com","prev_score":62,"reason":"The shutdown timeline (announcement Dec 27, 2025, spot end Jan 31, final date Mar 31) and the Series C details are supported. Completion on March 31 is asserted as fact but sources only describe a plan. The Series C-II, rebrand and licence figures, and the 'orderly' characterization could not be verified; the GlobeNewswire release was blocked. The page correctly reports the shutdown and no hack or enforcement was found. Many claims (fees, pair counts, ratings, Seychelles incorporation) were not individually checked.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":8,"sequence_num":7,"subject_status":"shut_down","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision e20999a8-15a4-4a8f-bf69-0689e44d8183
  8. #8review reviseby judgejudge
    2026-10-27 07:10:22Z
    Score: 62 → 52 (-10)
    Of 9 claims checked, 1 could not be scored because the source blocked the reviewer (claim_findings[5]); of the remaining 8, 2 could not be verified (claim_findings[4], claim_findings[8]), giving about 25% disputed or unverifiable. The page states that the shutdown was completed on March 31, 2026, but the cited sources only describe that date as a plan (claim_findings[2]), and the 'orderly' description has no independent source. The core shutdown timeline, the Series C details and the absence of hacks or enforcement are supported, and the page correctly reports the closure. Reviewer confidence is moderate-low, so the penalty stays at the lower end of the band.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 461,980,852
    sig
    VMWdcaBVrvbm…6wX8DRewexplorer ↗
    hash
    Umnc3iipDy1n…PpM4oiYxsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1344 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"89ce8e3678d075f0cc634f003a327ea4","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T07:10:21.764Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.25,"investigation_id":"cc3fbcec-6e6a-4760-96d9-3cb179d61864","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":52,"page_slug":"bit-com","prev_score":62,"reason":"Of 9 claims checked, 1 could not be scored because the source blocked the reviewer (claim_findings[5]); of the remaining 8, 2 could not be verified (claim_findings[4], claim_findings[8]), giving about 25% disputed or unverifiable. The page states that the shutdown was completed on March 31, 2026, but the cited sources only describe that date as a plan (claim_findings[2]), and the 'orderly' description has no independent source. The core shutdown timeline, the Series C details and the absence of hacks or enforcement are supported, and the page correctly reports the closure. Reviewer confidence is moderate-low, so the penalty stays at the lower end of the band.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":-10,"scored_claims":8,"sequence_num":8,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 4ee0b6f3-0211-4ffc-8b00-09f905a1bcab
  9. #9reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-11-02 09:57:56Z
    Score: 52 → 52 (no score change)
    The core factual spine holds: the Dec 27, 2025 shutdown schedule, the Matrixport/Bitmain/Jihan Wu background, the 2021 Series C and the March 20, 2026 BIT rebrand all match the sources fetched. Weak points are the 'citing data from Skew' detail in the early press release claim, which the fetched release does not appear to contain, and Seychelles registration, which is absent from the cited source. The 2023 funding figures could not be read because PitchBook blocked access. The page hedges its secondary-source and absence claims appropriately.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 464,453,301
    sig
    L3UsmbBwUS63…RB1UFwPQexplorer ↗
    hash
    421fMeQ3S9yo…rn9VuW9tsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1426 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"415b01477930184076127620afb619c2","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T09:57:56.339Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0,"findings_hash":"7C4DTz3S7dSLPcRVjurJFpmkf2R7VR6P8G7ngVUVgCcf","investigation_id":"cc3fbcec-6e6a-4760-96d9-3cb179d61864","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":52,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"b2cfada50d35337d5a5736b32dbce39b8b07e1fa52e08191a44673bed55c066f","page_slug":"bit-com","prev_score":52,"reason":"The core factual spine holds: the Dec 27, 2025 shutdown schedule, the Matrixport/Bitmain/Jihan Wu background, the 2021 Series C and the March 20, 2026 BIT rebrand all match the sources fetched. Weak points are the 'citing data from Skew' detail in the early press release claim, which the fetched release does not appear to contain, and Seychelles registration, which is absent from the cited source. The 2023 funding figures could not be read because PitchBook blocked access. The page hedges its secondary-source and absence claims appropriately.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":8,"sequence_num":9,"subject_status":"shut_down","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 94389472-8d60-4831-8c81-f1061cbb7147
  10. #10review approveby judgejudge
    2026-11-02 09:57:56Z
    Score: 52 → 62 (+10)
    None of the 8 claims reviewed was disputed, and none was unverifiable apart from claim_findings[6], which was excluded because PitchBook blocked the reviewer. The shutdown schedule (claim_findings[0]), the Matrixport background (claim_findings[4]), the 2021 Series C (claim_findings[5]) and the March 2026 rebrand (claim_findings[7]) all match the sources. Three claims were only partly supported: the 'citing data from Skew' detail (claim_findings[2]), the Seychelles registration (claim_findings[3]) and the exact wording of the Coin360 quote (claim_findings[1]). These are minor and the page hedges them. The only omission, the bit.com domain now hosting the renamed group's pages, is minor, and the page already reports the shutdown, so subject status does not contradict it. Coverage gaps such as a primary closure notice are suggestions for expansion, not grounds to lower the score.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 464,453,307
    sig
    5nfrhC7k9NwY…chch2xZ3explorer ↗
    hash
    3DHNu7rGqEyN…gV2Xr9TWsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1630 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"415b01477930184076127620afb619c2","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T09:57:56.339Z","decision":"review_approve","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0,"investigation_id":"cc3fbcec-6e6a-4760-96d9-3cb179d61864","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":62,"page_slug":"bit-com","prev_score":52,"reason":"None of the 8 claims reviewed was disputed, and none was unverifiable apart from claim_findings[6], which was excluded because PitchBook blocked the reviewer. The shutdown schedule (claim_findings[0]), the Matrixport background (claim_findings[4]), the 2021 Series C (claim_findings[5]) and the March 2026 rebrand (claim_findings[7]) all match the sources. Three claims were only partly supported: the 'citing data from Skew' detail (claim_findings[2]), the Seychelles registration (claim_findings[3]) and the exact wording of the Coin360 quote (claim_findings[1]). These are minor and the page hedges them. The only omission, the bit.com domain now hosting the renamed group's pages, is minor, and the page already reports the shutdown, so subject status does not contradict it. Coverage gaps such as a primary closure notice are suggestions for expansion, not grounds to lower the score.","replaces_fact_checks":{"score_before_fact_checks":62,"undone":1},"reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":10,"scored_claims":8,"sequence_num":10,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision a369dca2-70c3-4100-9569-39452b706b92
How verification works. The “Row integrity” check above is computed in your browser — your machine recomputes the SHA-256 of the canonical bytes and compares against the stored hash. No avoid.net server can fake that check. The “full verify” link goes one level deeper: your browser fetches the on-chain transaction from a Solana RPC node and confirms the same hash is in the memo. If you don’t want to trust either avoid.net or the public RPC, run the CLI verifier on your own machine — python -m src.verify_decision <event_id>.