← Best Wallet / BEST Token Presale4 decisions on this page
Audit log
Every state-changing event for Best Wallet / BEST Token Presale: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.
- #1publishby system:backfill2026-08-02 23:23:14ZScore: ? → ? (no score change)anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 443,503,765
- sig
281W7ggtEFts…QZ453fpaexplorer ↗- hash
ENogrAvvybMf…XXfNE2dwsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (18855 B) ▸
{"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"f5223fd4-de48-4448-ab1f-23ef5554ee9c","kind":"publish","page_slug":"best-wallet-best-token-presale","published_at":"2026-08-02T23:23:14.250Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"Best Wallet / BEST Token Presale","sections":[{"content":"The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published a formal warning on March 13, 2025 identifying Best Wallet — operating via bestwallet.com and bestwallettoken.com — as an unauthorised firm promoting cryptocurrency financial services to UK consumers without the required FCA permission. The FCA confirmed the firm does not appear on the Financial Services Register, meaning UK users have no access to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) or the Financial Ombudsman Service if funds are lost. The FCA noted the presale website displayed a pop-up cautioning UK visitors, but found no IP-geolocation blocking or other technical controls to prevent UK participation; the mobile apps on both the Apple App Store and Google Play Store were available to UK users without restriction. Spain's Comision Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV) separately warned in September 2025 that Best Wallet Token was not authorised to provide crypto-asset services under the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation. No other major financial regulators have publicly actioned the firm as of mid-2026.","heading":"Regulatory Warnings","severity":"critical","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"FCA Warning: Best Wallet / bestwallet.com / bestwallettoken.com","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.fca.org.uk/news/warnings/best-wallet-bestwalletcom-bestwallettokencom"},{"credibility":2,"name":"FCA Warns Against Best Wallet and $BEST Token Crypto Presale — TheHolyCoins","type":"news_article","url":"https://theholycoins.com/news/fca-issues-warning-over-best-wallet-s-unauthorised-cryptocurrency-wallet-services-and-active"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Is Best Wallet Crypto Legit or Scam? $BEST Token Review — TheHolyCoins","type":"news_article","url":"https://theholycoins.com/news/best-wallet-crypto-review-is-the-usdbest-token-legit-or-a-scam"}]},{"content":"Best Wallet is legally registered in Bulgaria under company name Best Wallet EOOD (Unified Identification Code 20807625), with a listed director of Mihail Rachev Nedelchev. The project's stated registration address is 9 Tsarigradsko Shose, Sofia, Bulgaria — the same address as Block Labs (also known as Block Media Labs) and Tamadoge, two previously scrutinised presale projects. Personnel overlap investigations by TheHolyCoins identified that Ozan Daldal transitioned from Head of Gaming at Tamadoge to Director of Revenue Operations at Block Labs, and that Neil Palethorpe was listed as a Tamadoge co-founder while simultaneously employed as a full-stack software developer at Block Labs. Block Labs itself has documented personnel ties to Tech Alchemy, which is owned through St Topco Limited (Soham Amrish Trivedi) and Jef Holdings Ltd (Jane Lucas Neale and James Edward Fennell). Despite these corporate-registry-level connections, no direct evidence of shared ownership between Best Wallet EOOD and Finixio or Block Labs has been filed in public records. The wallet's LinkedIn presence lists London, UK as its location — inconsistent with its Bulgarian registration — and investigative reporters have noted that some LinkedIn employee profile images appear to be stock photographs, casting doubt on the authenticity of the disclosed team.","heading":"Corporate Structure and Founder Anonymity","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Investigating Crypto Presale Links: Finixio, Block Labs and More — TheHolyCoins","type":"research","url":"https://theholycoins.com/news/finixio-and-block-labs-uncovering-potential-ties-to-best-wallet-and-tamadoge"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Finixio Network Exposed Part 2 — TheHolyCoins","type":"research","url":"https://theholycoins.com/news/finixio-network-exposed-part-2-gambling-sites-crypto-presale-wallet-loops-and-proof-of-ownership"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Is Best Wallet Crypto Legit or Scam? $BEST Token Review — TheHolyCoins","type":"news_article","url":"https://theholycoins.com/news/best-wallet-crypto-review-is-the-usdbest-token-legit-or-a-scam"}]},{"content":"Best Wallet launched the $BEST token presale in November 2024 with a fixed total supply of 10 billion tokens and a final presale price of $0.026015. The presale ran through November 2025 and raised approximately $18.2 million across multiple stages. Token allocation was disclosed as: 35% for marketing, 25% for product development, 10% for airdrops, and 8% for staking rewards. The absence of any founder or team allocation in the disclosed tokenomics was noted by analysts, though the practical effect on insider holdings remains unverifiable given the anonymity of the development team. The $BEST token listed on MEXC, KCEX, KuCoin, and Uniswap on November 28, 2025. On Uniswap the token fell approximately 70% within minutes of listing, dropping from roughly $0.0258 to $0.00784. The MEXC opening price was approximately $0.01, and the all-time high on MEXC was $0.01644. By subsequent trading sessions, the token had declined approximately 80% from the final presale price, contracting the fully diluted valuation from approximately $260 million to roughly $50 million. As of mid-2026 the token is approximately 89% below its all-time high. The trajectory mirrors that of Tamadoge and other presales associated with the same network of addresses and promoters.","heading":"BEST Token Presale and Post-Listing Price Collapse","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Best Wallet Launches BEST Token as Price Drops 80% After Exchange Listing — TheHolyCoins","type":"news_article","url":"https://theholycoins.com/news/best-wallet-launches-best-token-on-four-exchanges-as-price-drops-80-after-listing"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Best Wallet Token Presale — Scam Or Legitimate Opportunity? — Cryptomaniaks","type":"news_article","url":"https://cryptomaniaks.com/news/best-wallet-token-presale-scam-or-legit"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Is Best Wallet Token a Scam or Legit? — Coinspeaker","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coinspeaker.com/guides/is-best-wallet-a-scam-or-legit/"}]},{"content":"Best Wallet holds a reported Trustpilot rating of approximately 2.0–2.2 out of 5, with multiple one-star reviews citing inability to withdraw funds, funds disappearing from the wallet interface, transactions failing with generic error messages such as \"Oops! Something went wrong,\" and assets transferred into the app not appearing. Specific alleged incidents include: a user reporting $4,500 in funds missing; users receiving full confirmation from external exchanges on BEP20 network transfers that never credited inside the Best Wallet app; users who participated in the Pepe Unchained presale (a separate project promoted alongside Best Wallet by the same Finixio/Clickout Media network) reporting that tokens purchased were inaccessible via the Best Wallet app following the December 10, 2024 launch. Best Wallet's public response to withdrawal complaints has consistently cited its non-custodial architecture — stating the company never holds private keys — and attributed fund losses to compromised keys from other sources. Independent verification of individual user loss claims is not possible from public records. No law enforcement actions or court filings relating to user fund losses have been identified as of mid-2026.","heading":"User Complaints: Withdrawal Failures and Missing Funds","severity":"high","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"Bestwallet Reviews — Trustpilot","type":"community_report","url":"https://www.trustpilot.com/review/bestwallet.com"},{"credibility":3,"name":"Best Wallet BEST Token User Complaints — Xolvie/Sikayetvar","type":"community_report","url":"https://www.sikayetvar.com/en/best-wallet-us"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Finixio Network Exposed Part 2 — TheHolyCoins","type":"research","url":"https://theholycoins.com/news/finixio-network-exposed-part-2-gambling-sites-crypto-presale-wallet-loops-and-proof-of-ownership"}]},{"content":"Best Wallet and the $BEST presale were heavily promoted through Clickout Media, also known as Finixio, a network that operates numerous crypto affiliate and news sites and has been associated with multiple anonymous presale projects. YouTube influencers including Clay Bro and Austin Hilton promoted $BEST without disclosing sponsorship arrangements, according to investigative reporting by TheHolyCoins. The same promotional infrastructure was previously used for Pepe Unchained, Solaxy, and Flockerz, projects that share stylistic and structural similarities with Best Wallet's presale. The project's official Telegram channel is t.me/Best_Wallet and its social handle is @BestWalletHQ on both X (formerly Twitter) and Instagram.","heading":"Promotion Network and Influencer Ties","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Is Best Wallet Crypto Legit or Scam? $BEST Token Review — TheHolyCoins","type":"news_article","url":"https://theholycoins.com/news/best-wallet-crypto-review-is-the-usdbest-token-legit-or-a-scam"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Finixio Network Exposed Part 2 — TheHolyCoins","type":"research","url":"https://theholycoins.com/news/finixio-network-exposed-part-2-gambling-sites-crypto-presale-wallet-loops-and-proof-of-ownership"}]},{"content":"The $BEST token smart contract was audited by Coinsult, which found no current security issues and concluded the contract has minimal centralization risks: the contract owner cannot pause it, set blacklist addresses, or mint new tokens, and the total supply is fixed at 10 billion. CertiK completed two penetration testing audits on the Best Wallet application, the most recent delivered on July 1, 2025. CertiK's Skynet platform assigns Best Wallet an overall security score of 76.93/100 (BBB rating). The CertiK audit identified 12 total findings: one medium-severity information disclosure issue (resolved), nine minor security misconfiguration issues (four acknowledged, five resolved), and two informational findings (one acknowledged, one resolved). No critical or major vulnerabilities were identified. CertiK's sub-component scores show a notably weak Fundamental Health score of 49.62/100, in contrast to Community Trust (94.78/100) and Governance Strength (93.14/100). The wallet uses Multi-Party Computation (MPC) technology from Fireblocks for key management. These audits address smart contract security and application penetration testing; they do not constitute regulatory compliance approvals or endorsements of the project's business practices.","heading":"Security Audits and Technical Findings","severity":"low","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Best Wallet — CertiK Skynet Project Insight","type":"research","url":"https://skynet.certik.com/projects/best-wallet"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Is Best Wallet Token a Scam or Legit? — Coinspeaker","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coinspeaker.com/guides/is-best-wallet-a-scam-or-legit/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Is Best Wallet Legit? 2025 Security and $BEST Token Review — Bitget Wallet","type":"news_article","url":"https://web3.bitget.com/crypto-news/is-best-wallet-legit-a-2025-deep-dive-into-security-and-best-token"}]},{"content":"Best Wallet is a self-custody, multi-chain mobile application available on both the Apple App Store and Google Play Store. The project reports over 500,000 downloads on Google Play (rated 3.9/5) and a 4.5-star rating on the App Store from approximately 3,764 reviews. The wallet purportedly supports over 1,000 cryptocurrencies across more than 60 blockchains, and incorporates an in-app presale discovery feature that allows users to participate in crypto presales directly. These adoption figures are self-reported by the project and have not been independently verified by a third party. The continued availability of the app on both major app stores despite active FCA and CNMV regulatory warnings has been noted as a concern by investigators.","heading":"Product and Adoption Claims","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":2,"name":"Is Best Wallet Token a Scam or Legit? — Coinspeaker","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coinspeaker.com/guides/is-best-wallet-a-scam-or-legit/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Best Wallet Review 2026: Is This Crypto Wallet Legit? — CoinNews","type":"news_article","url":"https://coinnews.com/best-crypto-wallets/best-wallet-review/"},{"credibility":1,"name":"FCA Warning: Best Wallet / bestwallet.com / bestwallettoken.com","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.fca.org.uk/news/warnings/best-wallet-bestwalletcom-bestwallettokencom"}]}],"sources_used":[{"credibility":1,"name":"FCA Warning: Best Wallet / bestwallet.com / bestwallettoken.com","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.fca.org.uk/news/warnings/best-wallet-bestwalletcom-bestwallettokencom"},{"credibility":2,"name":"FCA Warns Against Best Wallet and $BEST Token Crypto Presale — TheHolyCoins","type":"news_article","url":"https://theholycoins.com/news/fca-issues-warning-over-best-wallet-s-unauthorised-cryptocurrency-wallet-services-and-active"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Is Best Wallet Crypto Legit or Scam? $BEST Token Review — TheHolyCoins","type":"news_article","url":"https://theholycoins.com/news/best-wallet-crypto-review-is-the-usdbest-token-legit-or-a-scam"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Best Wallet Launches BEST Token as Price Drops 80% After Exchange Listing — TheHolyCoins","type":"news_article","url":"https://theholycoins.com/news/best-wallet-launches-best-token-on-four-exchanges-as-price-drops-80-after-listing"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Investigating Crypto Presale Links: Finixio, Block Labs and More — TheHolyCoins","type":"research","url":"https://theholycoins.com/news/finixio-and-block-labs-uncovering-potential-ties-to-best-wallet-and-tamadoge"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Finixio Network Exposed Part 2 — TheHolyCoins","type":"research","url":"https://theholycoins.com/news/finixio-network-exposed-part-2-gambling-sites-crypto-presale-wallet-loops-and-proof-of-ownership"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Best Wallet Token Presale — Scam Or Legitimate Opportunity? — Cryptomaniaks","type":"news_article","url":"https://cryptomaniaks.com/news/best-wallet-token-presale-scam-or-legit"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Is Best Wallet Token a Scam or Legit? — Coinspeaker","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coinspeaker.com/guides/is-best-wallet-a-scam-or-legit/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Best Wallet — CertiK Skynet Project Insight","type":"research","url":"https://skynet.certik.com/projects/best-wallet"},{"credibility":3,"name":"Bestwallet Reviews — Trustpilot","type":"community_report","url":"https://www.trustpilot.com/review/bestwallet.com"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Best Wallet Review 2026: Is This Crypto Wallet Legit? — CoinNews","type":"news_article","url":"https://coinnews.com/best-crypto-wallets/best-wallet-review/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Is Best Wallet Legit? 2025 Security and $BEST Token Review — Bitget Wallet","type":"news_article","url":"https://web3.bitget.com/crypto-news/is-best-wallet-legit-a-2025-deep-dive-into-security-and-best-token"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Is Best Wallet Token Legit? BEST Presale Review — CoinNews","type":"news_article","url":"https://coinnews.com/guide/is-best-wallet-token-legit/"},{"credibility":1,"name":"FCA Warning List of Unauthorised Firms","type":"regulatory","url":"https://www.fca.org.uk/consumers/warning-list-unauthorised-firms"}],"summary":"Best Wallet is a self-custody multi-chain crypto wallet app developed by Best Wallet EOOD, a Bulgarian-registered entity (UIC 20807625), that conducted the $BEST token presale from November 2024 through November 2025, raising approximately $18.2 million. The UK's Financial Conduct Authority issued a formal warning in March 2025 that the firm operates without authorisation, Spain's CNMV issued a similar warning in September 2025 under MiCA, and the token collapsed approximately 80% from its final presale price within hours of its November 28, 2025 exchange listing. The founding team remains anonymous, the project shares a Sofia, Bulgaria registration address with previously scrutinised projects Tamadoge and Block Labs, and users have reported persistent withdrawal failures and missing funds.","timeline":[{"date":"2024-11-01","event":"$BEST token presale launched; token offered at staged pricing with a final presale price of $0.026015 and a target raise","source":"TheHolyCoins / Cryptomaniaks","source_url":"https://theholycoins.com/news/best-wallet-crypto-review-is-the-usdbest-token-legit-or-a-scam"},{"date":"2024-12-10","event":"Pepe Unchained token launched; users reported being unable to access tokens via the Best Wallet app, the wallet promoted for the presale","source":"TheHolyCoins (Finixio Part 2 investigation)","source_url":"https://theholycoins.com/news/finixio-network-exposed-part-2-gambling-sites-crypto-presale-wallet-loops-and-proof-of-ownership"},{"date":"2025-02-26","event":"CertiK initial penetration testing audit of Best Wallet application requested","source":"CertiK Skynet","source_url":"https://skynet.certik.com/projects/best-wallet"},{"date":"2025-03-13","event":"UK Financial Conduct Authority published formal warning: Best Wallet is not authorised and may be targeting people in the UK; covers bestwallet.com, bestwallettoken.com, and mobile apps","source":"FCA Official Warning List","source_url":"https://www.fca.org.uk/news/warnings/best-wallet-bestwalletcom-bestwallettokencom"},{"date":"2025-07-01","event":"CertiK delivered second and most recent penetration testing audit; overall score 76.93/100 (BBB); no critical or major vulnerabilities found","source":"CertiK Skynet","source_url":"https://skynet.certik.com/projects/best-wallet"},{"date":"2025-09-01","event":"Spain's CNMV warned that Best Wallet Token is not authorised to provide crypto-asset services under MiCA","source":"TheHolyCoins","source_url":"https://theholycoins.com/news/best-wallet-crypto-review-is-the-usdbest-token-legit-or-a-scam"},{"date":"2025-11-28","event":"$BEST token listed on Uniswap (12 PM UTC), MEXC (2 PM UTC), KCEX (2 PM UTC), and KuCoin (3 PM UTC); token fell approximately 70% on Uniswap within minutes of listing, from ~$0.0258 to ~$0.00784; overall decline from final presale price approximately 80%","source":"TheHolyCoins","source_url":"https://theholycoins.com/news/best-wallet-launches-best-token-on-four-exchanges-as-price-drops-80-after-listing"},{"date":"2025-11-30","event":"$BEST presale concluded; total raised confirmed at approximately $18.2 million","source":"Coinspeaker / TheHolyCoins","source_url":"https://www.coinspeaker.com/guides/is-best-wallet-a-scam-or-legit/"}]},"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 21295b33-4995-44de-bcc7-be1f0120d1a5 - #2reviewby reviewerreviewer2026-08-26 11:45:54ZScore: 22 → 22 (no score change)The page's core regulatory findings (FCA and CNMV warnings), corporate-registration/personnel-overlap claims, and the Nov 28 2025 listing-collapse mechanics are well corroborated by independent or primary sources. However, several figures are stale relative to today's market data (the token has declined further than the page's '89% below ATH' and Trustpilot rating claims suggest), the tokenomics allocation is presented with an unexplained 22-percentage-point gap versus the fuller breakdown available in the same source ecosystem, an audit claim (Coinsult) rests on no retrievable primary report, and one specific claim (named YouTube influencers Clay Bro/Austin Hilton) is not actually contained in either of its two cited sources. Raise totals, download/rating figures, and adoption metrics are drawn mainly from guide-style or project-adjacent crypto media and are appropriately treated as unverifiable rather than confirmed.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 443,520,700
- sig
5KX3mmDASaVT…JsBDTQyBexplorer ↗- hash
Ao1kTMDucGQb…uBHYJCtksha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1298 B) ▸
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-26T11:45:54.371Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"f5223fd4-de48-4448-ab1f-23ef5554ee9c","new_score":22,"page_slug":"best-wallet-best-token-presale","prev_score":22,"reason":"The page's core regulatory findings (FCA and CNMV warnings), corporate-registration/personnel-overlap claims, and the Nov 28 2025 listing-collapse mechanics are well corroborated by independent or primary sources. However, several figures are stale relative to today's market data (the token has declined further than the page's '89% below ATH' and Trustpilot rating claims suggest), the tokenomics allocation is presented with an unexplained 22-percentage-point gap versus the fuller breakdown available in the same source ecosystem, an audit claim (Coinsult) rests on no retrievable primary report, and one specific claim (named YouTube influencers Clay Bro/Austin Hilton) is not actually contained in either of its two cited sources. Raise totals, download/rating figures, and adoption metrics are drawn mainly from guide-style or project-adjacent crypto media and are appropriately treated as unverifiable rather than confirmed.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 45c92ace-1005-48ba-afbe-f5819273536c - #3review reviseby judgejudge2026-08-26 11:45:54ZScore: 22 → 10 (-12)The review confirms the page's central claims: the FCA's March 2025 unauthorised-firm warning (claim_findings[1], [7], [8]) was verified directly against the FCA's own site, and the Nov 28, 2025 exchange-listing price collapse (claim_findings[3]) is corroborated in detail. But a handful of specific claims do not hold up as cited. The tokenomics breakdown (claim_findings[21]) is disputed: the page's 35/25/10/8% figures sum to only 78%, omitting three categories that account for the remaining 22%, which creates a misleading impression of an unexplained allocation gap rather than the actual, fully-accounted breakdown. Two named individuals, YouTube promoters Clay Bro and Austin Hilton, are not actually contained in either source cited for that claim (claim_findings[35]) — a citation error involving real people that should be fixed or removed. The Coinsult audit claim rests on no retrievable audit report from Coinsult itself (claim_findings[38]), only secondary summaries. The bulk of the 12 unverifiable findings, however, are lower-severity: raise totals and adoption figures are corroborated only by promotional or aggregator-style presale media rather than contradicted by better evidence, which reflects a known limitation of this content category rather than a factual failure of the page.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 443,520,799
- sig
5qitAffyMKUt…fYga2r8texplorer ↗- hash
CN3zyJqmZ8ox…6dri3WMHsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1677 B) ▸
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-26T11:45:54.371Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"f5223fd4-de48-4448-ab1f-23ef5554ee9c","new_score":10,"page_slug":"best-wallet-best-token-presale","prev_score":22,"reason":"The review confirms the page's central claims: the FCA's March 2025 unauthorised-firm warning (claim_findings[1], [7], [8]) was verified directly against the FCA's own site, and the Nov 28, 2025 exchange-listing price collapse (claim_findings[3]) is corroborated in detail. But a handful of specific claims do not hold up as cited. The tokenomics breakdown (claim_findings[21]) is disputed: the page's 35/25/10/8% figures sum to only 78%, omitting three categories that account for the remaining 22%, which creates a misleading impression of an unexplained allocation gap rather than the actual, fully-accounted breakdown. Two named individuals, YouTube promoters Clay Bro and Austin Hilton, are not actually contained in either source cited for that claim (claim_findings[35]) — a citation error involving real people that should be fixed or removed. The Coinsult audit claim rests on no retrievable audit report from Coinsult itself (claim_findings[38]), only secondary summaries. The bulk of the 12 unverifiable findings, however, are lower-severity: raise totals and adoption figures are corroborated only by promotional or aggregator-style presale media rather than contradicted by better evidence, which reflects a known limitation of this content category rather than a factual failure of the page.","score_delta":-12,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 6151f573-b29b-4582-852b-6bdc31ff8e26 - #4reviewby reviewerreviewer2026-09-09 03:05:01ZScore: 10 → 10 (no score change)Findings-only fact-check (retroactive anchor of stored findings)anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 445,505,194
- sig
2KwCgUHZ2cnm…4wbLFMWEexplorer ↗- hash
3K3mzCQ1JuWg…G4yDsa8usha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (722 B) ▸
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"3dc418aaa37353c0ba97ba0b909491db","decided_at":"2026-09-07T16:24:41.15709+00:00","decision":"review","findings_count":34,"findings_rows_hash":"a2927e860e3a8e51b90bcccb9269d9d2c660bc035f68ad53cd52af2743922a3f","investigation_id":"f5223fd4-de48-4448-ab1f-23ef5554ee9c","mode":"findings_only_retroactive","new_score":10,"page_content_hash":"c9a017d2d482c5ac4411cf851c5e5d88dfed756f1ecb0c494d8360cfea222beb","page_slug":"best-wallet-best-token-presale","prev_score":10,"reason":"Findings-only fact-check (retroactive anchor of stored findings)","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision f339de24-81ce-4327-a324-8925343a8a73
How verification works. The “Row integrity” check above is computed in your browser — your machine recomputes the SHA-256 of the canonical bytes and compares against the stored hash. No avoid.net server can fake that check. The “full verify” link goes one level deeper: your browser fetches the on-chain transaction from a Solana RPC node and confirms the same hash is in the memo. If you don’t want to trust either avoid.net or the public RPC, run the CLI verifier on your own machine —
python -m src.verify_decision <event_id>.