← Asymmetric Research3 decisions on this page
Audit log
Every state-changing event for Asymmetric Research: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.
- #1publishby system:backfill2026-09-01 23:57:29ZScore: ? → ? (no score change)anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 443,553,768
- sig
65Lte3ixDN2e…jVLC5Kdbexplorer ↗- hash
7VHLw9sExojq…X2CEqFjssha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (23531 B) ▸
{"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"32e99313-f1cd-4ae6-aed7-c70d28b72801","kind":"publish","page_slug":"asymmetric-research","published_at":"2026-09-01T23:57:28.948Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"Asymmetric Research","sections":[{"content":"Asymmetric Research is a private blockchain security firm offering embedded security engineering, smart contract audits, incident response, infrastructure validation, and security research. The firm describes its mission as becoming 'the most trusted security firm on the planet' serving web3 founders with high-stakes security needs. According to its website, the company employs 45 or more team members distributed across North America, Europe, and Asia. No specific founding year is disclosed in public sources, though activity on its GitHub security-advisories repository began in early 2024. The firm does not appear in any standard rankings of top smart contract audit firms published in 2026, which may reflect its positioning as an embedded partner rather than a transactional auditor.","heading":"Company Overview","severity":"low","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"Asymmetric Research — Company page","type":"official","url":"https://www.asymmetric.re/company"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Asymmetric Research — Homepage","type":"official","url":"https://www.asymmetric.re/"}]},{"content":"Jonathan Claudius is co-founder and CEO. His public biography lists more than two decades in cybersecurity, with prior roles including Chief Security Officer at Jump Crypto, Director of Security Assurance at Mozilla, and Lead Security Researcher at Trustwave SpiderLabs. He holds a BS in Applied Networking and System Administration from Rochester Institute of Technology.\n\nFelix Wilhelm is co-founder and CTO. His publicly documented prior roles include Security Researcher at Google Project Zero, a role at Jump Crypto, and earlier positions at ERNW Research GmbH and KPMG. He holds an M.Sc. in Informatik from Karlsruher Institut fur Technologie (KIT). Wilhelm is credited with discovering the Marginfi flash loan vulnerability disclosed in September 2025.\n\nA third co-founder, Jeff Schroeder, is named in one source but does not have a publicly detailed biography in available materials.","heading":"Founders and Key Personnel","severity":"low","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"Jonathan Claudius — Asymmetric Research team page","type":"official","url":"https://www.asymmetric.re/team/jonathan-claudius"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Felix Wilhelm — Asymmetric Research team page","type":"official","url":"https://www.asymmetric.re/team/felix-wilhelm"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Felix Wilhelm — Crunchbase profile","type":"other","url":"https://www.crunchbase.com/person/felix-wilhelm"}]},{"content":"Asymmetric Research's GitHub security-advisories repository and public blog document a series of responsible disclosures across multiple ecosystems. Key verified disclosures include:\n\n- Cosmos IBC Reentrancy Infinite Mint (April 2024, Critical): A reentrancy vulnerability during IBC timeout message handling that could have allowed an attacker to mint an unlimited quantity of IBC tokens on affected Cosmos chains. The flaw put at least $126 million at risk according to reporting by CoinTelegraph and CoinDesk. Asymmetric Research disclosed the issue through Cosmos HackerOne's bug bounty program. No funds were lost and no exploit occurred.\n\n- Polygon Heimdall Log Confusion (February 2024, High): A log confusion vulnerability allowing Heimdall to parse specially crafted events as critical consensus events, potentially enabling a takeover of the network's consensus layer.\n\n- Circle / Noble CCTP Mint Bug (August 2024, Critical): A flaw in Noble-CCTP's ReceiveMessage handler that accepted BurnMessages from unverified senders, enabling potential counterfeit USDC minting. The effective impact was capped by Noble's mint limit of approximately 35 million USDC. Disclosed privately to Circle via bug bounty; no user funds lost.\n\n- Evmos Distribution Precompile DoS (June 2024, High) and Evmos Precompile State Commit Infinite Mint (August 2024, Critical): Two separate vulnerabilities in the Evmos chain's precompile execution layer.\n\n- Ethereum Ghost in the Block (September 2024, Medium): Nuances in SSZ deserialization between Prysm and Lighthouse consensus clients with potential consensus integrity implications.\n\n- Helix MEV Relay Proposer Equivocation (December 2024, High): Lack of validation on proposer commitments to blob data enabling unbundling attacks.\n\n- Marginfi Flash Loan Vulnerability (September 2025, Critical): A new instruction in the Marginfi lending protocol broke flash loan repayment verification logic, putting more than $160 million in user deposits at risk. Discovered by Felix Wilhelm via Marginfi's bug bounty program. Patched before any exploit.\n\n- Solana ZK ElGamal Proof / Token-2022 (April–May 2025): Asymmetric Research reviewed and provided incident support for the patch addressing a critical flaw in the ZK ElGamal Proof program's Fiat-Shamir Transformation implementation, alongside Neodyme and OtterSec. The original report was made by a researcher known as LonelySloth. No funds were lost.\n\n- Across Protocol Event Spoofing (April 2026): A vulnerability in Across Protocol where an attacker could spoof deposit events and deceive relayers into filling unfunded orders.\n\n- Solana p-token Bug Before Mainnet (April 2026): Felix Wilhelm disclosed a critical vulnerability caught during optimization work before the feature reached mainnet deployment.\n\nThe firm also disclosed vulnerabilities in CometBFT's BLS12-381 key validation and signature generation in September 2024.\n\nAll public disclosures on record were made through responsible disclosure channels (bug bounty programs or direct coordination), and no known instances of exploits occurring against patched code have been found in available sources.","heading":"Notable Security Disclosures","severity":"low","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"GitHub: Asymmetric Research Security Advisories","type":"official","url":"https://github.com/asymmetric-research/security-advisories"},{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinDesk: Patched Cosmos Bug Could've Put $150M At Risk","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2024/04/23/patched-cosmos-bug-couldve-put-150m-at-risk-says-firm-that-reported-it"},{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinTelegraph: Cosmos patches critical IBC protocol bug, saving $126M","type":"news_article","url":"https://cointelegraph.com/news/cosmos-patches-bug-ibc-protocol-saves-126m"},{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinTelegraph: Critical bug identified and remedied in Circle's Noble-CCTP","type":"news_article","url":"https://cointelegraph.com/news/critical-bug-identified-remedied-circle-noble-cctp"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Blockworks: Asymmetric Research discloses Marginfi flash loan bug that risked $160M","type":"news_article","url":"https://blockworks.co/news/marginfi-flash-loan-bug"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Solana Foundation: Post Mortem — ZK ElGamal Proof Program Bug (May 2, 2025)","type":"official","url":"https://solana.com/news/post-mortem-may-2-2025"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Asymmetric Research blog: Threat Contained — marginfi Flash Loan Vulnerability","type":"official","url":"https://blog.asymmetric.re/threat-contained-marginfi-flash-loan-vulnerability/"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Asymmetric Research blog: Cosmos IBC Reentrancy Infinite Mint","type":"official","url":"https://blog.asymmetric.re/cosmos-ibc-reentrancy-infinite-mint/"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Asymmetric Research blog: Circle's CCTP Noble Mint Bug","type":"official","url":"https://blog.asymmetric.re/circles-cctp-noble-mint-bug/"}]},{"content":"Asymmetric Research operates primarily through embedded, long-term security partnerships rather than one-off audit engagements. Publicly documented client relationships include:\n\n- Wormhole: The Wormhole Foundation awarded Asymmetric Research a Core Contributor Grant, disclosed publicly in 2024. According to the announcement, Asymmetric had been a core contributor to the Wormhole Protocol for two years prior to public disclosure. Scope includes security engineering, incident response, forensics, audits, monitoring, vulnerability management, and bug bounty program administration.\n\n- Stacks / sBTC: In October 2024, the Stacks Foundation announced Asymmetric Research as a core security contributor and sBTC signer, joining an established signer group that includes BitGo, Blockdaemon, Copper, Figment, Kiln, Luganodes, and Chorus One.\n\n- Solana Foundation: Asymmetric co-led the STRIDE (Solana Trust, Resilience and Infrastructure for DeFi Enterprises) program, launched in April 2026. The program provides continuous, foundation-funded security evaluation for Solana DeFi protocols across eight security pillars.\n\n- Jito Labs: Listed as a client testimonial on the Asymmetric website; Jonathan Claudius submitted a governance delegate proposal to the Jito Foundation.\n\n- Firedancer: Asymmetric lists involvement as a key security contributor to the Firedancer Solana validator client.\n\n- Additional clients listed in website testimonials include Euler, Immunefi, Kyberswap, and Douro Labs.","heading":"Client Relationships and Partnerships","severity":"low","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"Wormhole Foundation: Core Contributor Grant to Asymmetric Research","type":"official","url":"https://wormhole.foundation/blog/wormhole-foundation-awards-core-contributor-grant-to-asymmetric-research-for-platform-security"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Stacks Foundation: Asymmetric Research Joins Stacks Ecosystem as Core Security Contributor","type":"official","url":"https://stacks.foundation/asymmetric-joins-stacks-ecosystem"},{"credibility":2,"name":"CrowdFund Insider: Solana Foundation Rolls Out STRIDE Program","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.crowdfundinsider.com/2026/04/271827-solana-foundation-rolls-out-stride-program-to-enhance-cybersecurity-across-defi-protocols/"},{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinDesk: Solana Foundation launches security overhaul days after $270M Drift exploit","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2026/04/07/solana-foundation-unveils-security-overhaul-days-after-usd270-million-drift-exploit"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Asymmetric Research blog: Introducing STRIDE","type":"official","url":"https://blog.asymmetric.re/introducing-stride-a-security-program-for-the-solana-ecosystem/"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Jito Foundation Forum: Delegate Proposal — Jonathan Claudius / Asymmetric Research","type":"official","url":"https://forum.jito.network/t/delegate-proposal-jonathan-claudius-asymmetric-research/398"}]},{"content":"In May 2025, Solana validators quietly adopted a critical patch for the ZK ElGamal Proof program vulnerability before any public disclosure was made. The patch was distributed privately beginning April 17, 2025, with a supermajority of stake adopting it by April 18, 2025. Asymmetric Research, Neodyme, and OtterSec conducted patch reviews as part of the coordinated response.\n\nThe private coordination of the patch drew criticism from some in the crypto community who argued it raised concerns about centralization and validator collusion within the Solana network. Critics focused on the closed-door process rather than any conduct attributed to Asymmetric Research specifically. Asymmetric Research's role in this incident was as one of three reviewing security firms; the firm did not organize the patch process. No finding of wrongdoing has been attributed to Asymmetric Research in connection with this event.","heading":"Solana Patch Process and Decentralization Concerns","severity":"low","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"Solana Foundation: Post Mortem — ZK ElGamal Proof Program Bug","type":"official","url":"https://solana.com/news/post-mortem-may-2-2025"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Yellow.com: Solana Vulnerability Patched Quietly, Raising Concerns Over Validator Collusion","type":"news_article","url":"https://yellow.com/news/solana-vulnerability-patched-quietly-raising-concerns-over-validator-collusion"},{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinDesk: Solana quietly fixes bug that could have let attackers mint and steal certain tokens","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2025/05/05/solana-quietly-fixes-bug-that-could-have-let-attackers-mint-and-steal-certain-tokens"}]},{"content":"No regulatory actions, enforcement proceedings, court filings, or legal complaints involving Asymmetric Research have been identified in available sources as of September 2026. The firm has no OFAC designations, SEC actions, or CFTC proceedings on public record. No fraud, theft, or financial misconduct allegations appear in any available Tier 1 or Tier 2 sources.","heading":"Regulatory and Legal Status","severity":"low","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"Asymmetric Research — Official website","type":"official","url":"https://www.asymmetric.re/"}]},{"content":"Asymmetric Research's website and security page make several aggregate claims that have not been independently verified by Tier 1 or Tier 2 sources:\n\n- 'Discoveries and responsible disclosures have prevented over $100 billion in potential losses.' Individual disclosures covered in third-party reporting are consistent with high-severity bugs, but the $100 billion aggregate figure originates solely from Asymmetric Research's own materials and has not been audited or corroborated by an independent party.\n\n- '$300 million or more in digital assets recovered' through incident response work. The specific incidents underlying this figure are not enumerated in any available public source.\n\n- 'Prevented over $5 billion in potential losses' through responsible disclosure — a figure cited in the Wormhole Foundation grant announcement and the Felix Wilhelm Crunchbase profile. This lower figure appears in third-party announcements, lending it slightly more credibility than the $100 billion figure, but it remains unaudited.\n\nThese figures should be treated as self-reported marketing claims rather than independently verified metrics.","heading":"Unverified and Self-Reported Claims","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":1,"name":"Asymmetric Research — Security page","type":"official","url":"https://www.asymmetric.re/security"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Wormhole Foundation: Core Contributor Grant announcement","type":"official","url":"https://wormhole.foundation/blog/wormhole-foundation-awards-core-contributor-grant-to-asymmetric-research-for-platform-security"}]}],"sources_used":[{"credibility":1,"name":"Asymmetric Research — Homepage","type":"official","url":"https://www.asymmetric.re/"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Asymmetric Research — Security page","type":"official","url":"https://www.asymmetric.re/security"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Asymmetric Research — Company page","type":"official","url":"https://www.asymmetric.re/company"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Asymmetric Research — Blog","type":"official","url":"https://blog.asymmetric.re/"},{"credibility":1,"name":"GitHub: Asymmetric Research Security Advisories","type":"official","url":"https://github.com/asymmetric-research/security-advisories"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Solana Foundation: Post Mortem — ZK ElGamal Proof Program Bug","type":"official","url":"https://solana.com/news/post-mortem-may-2-2025"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Wormhole Foundation: Core Contributor Grant to Asymmetric Research","type":"official","url":"https://wormhole.foundation/blog/wormhole-foundation-awards-core-contributor-grant-to-asymmetric-research-for-platform-security"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Stacks Foundation: Asymmetric Research Joins Stacks Ecosystem","type":"official","url":"https://stacks.foundation/asymmetric-joins-stacks-ecosystem"},{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinDesk: Patched Cosmos Bug Could've Put $150M At Risk","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2024/04/23/patched-cosmos-bug-couldve-put-150m-at-risk-says-firm-that-reported-it"},{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinTelegraph: Cosmos patches critical IBC protocol bug, saving $126M","type":"news_article","url":"https://cointelegraph.com/news/cosmos-patches-bug-ibc-protocol-saves-126m"},{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinTelegraph: Critical bug identified and remedied in Circle's Noble-CCTP","type":"news_article","url":"https://cointelegraph.com/news/critical-bug-identified-remedied-circle-noble-cctp"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Blockworks: Asymmetric Research discloses Marginfi flash loan bug that risked $160M","type":"news_article","url":"https://blockworks.co/news/marginfi-flash-loan-bug"},{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinDesk: Solana quietly fixes bug that could have let attackers mint and steal certain tokens","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2025/05/05/solana-quietly-fixes-bug-that-could-have-let-attackers-mint-and-steal-certain-tokens"},{"credibility":1,"name":"CoinDesk: Solana Foundation launches security overhaul days after $270M Drift exploit","type":"news_article","url":"https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2026/04/07/solana-foundation-unveils-security-overhaul-days-after-usd270-million-drift-exploit"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Yellow.com: Solana Vulnerability Patched Quietly, Raising Concerns Over Validator Collusion","type":"news_article","url":"https://yellow.com/news/solana-vulnerability-patched-quietly-raising-concerns-over-validator-collusion"},{"credibility":2,"name":"Jito Foundation Forum: Delegate Proposal — Jonathan Claudius / Asymmetric Research","type":"community_report","url":"https://forum.jito.network/t/delegate-proposal-jonathan-claudius-asymmetric-research/398"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Jonathan Claudius — Asymmetric Research team page","type":"official","url":"https://www.asymmetric.re/team/jonathan-claudius"},{"credibility":1,"name":"Felix Wilhelm — Asymmetric Research team page","type":"official","url":"https://www.asymmetric.re/team/felix-wilhelm"}],"summary":"Asymmetric Research is a specialized blockchain security firm founded by Jonathan Claudius (formerly CSO at Jump Crypto) and Felix Wilhelm (formerly at Google Project Zero and Jump Crypto), with a team of 45+ researchers across North America, Europe, and Asia. The firm focuses on embedded, long-term security partnerships with L1/L2 blockchains and DeFi protocols, and has disclosed multiple high-severity vulnerabilities across Cosmos, Solana, Ethereum, and Circle infrastructure. No regulatory actions, fraud allegations, or client harm incidents have been identified in available sources.","timeline":[{"date":"2024-02-08","event":"Asymmetric Research discloses a high-severity log confusion vulnerability in Polygon Heimdall that could have enabled consensus layer takeover.","source":"GitHub: asymmetric-research/security-advisories","source_url":"https://github.com/asymmetric-research/security-advisories"},{"date":"2024-04-16","event":"Asymmetric Research discloses a critical reentrancy vulnerability in Cosmos IBC timeout handling enabling infinite token minting, putting at least $126 million at risk. Disclosed via Cosmos HackerOne; no funds lost.","source":"CoinDesk","source_url":"https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2024/04/23/patched-cosmos-bug-couldve-put-150m-at-risk-says-firm-that-reported-it"},{"date":"2024-06-19","event":"Asymmetric Research discloses a high-severity DoS vulnerability in Evmos Distribution Precompile.","source":"GitHub: asymmetric-research/security-advisories","source_url":"https://github.com/asymmetric-research/security-advisories"},{"date":"2024-08-01","event":"Asymmetric Research discloses a critical Evmos precompile state commit vulnerability enabling unauthorized token minting.","source":"GitHub: asymmetric-research/security-advisories","source_url":"https://github.com/asymmetric-research/security-advisories"},{"date":"2024-08-27","event":"Asymmetric Research discloses a critical vulnerability in Circle's Noble-CCTP enabling potential counterfeit USDC minting. Disclosed to Circle via bug bounty; no funds lost.","source":"CoinTelegraph","source_url":"https://cointelegraph.com/news/critical-bug-identified-remedied-circle-noble-cctp"},{"date":"2024-09-19","event":"Asymmetric Research discloses a medium-severity SSZ deserialization inconsistency between Ethereum Prysm and Lighthouse clients.","source":"GitHub: asymmetric-research/security-advisories","source_url":"https://github.com/asymmetric-research/security-advisories"},{"date":"2024-09-25","event":"Asymmetric Research discloses two medium-severity BLS12-381 cryptographic issues in CometBFT.","source":"GitHub: asymmetric-research/security-advisories","source_url":"https://github.com/asymmetric-research/security-advisories"},{"date":"2024-10-01","event":"Stacks Foundation announces Asymmetric Research as a core security contributor and sBTC signer for the Stacks Bitcoin L2 ecosystem.","source":"Stacks Foundation","source_url":"https://stacks.foundation/asymmetric-joins-stacks-ecosystem"},{"date":"2024-12-06","event":"Asymmetric Research discloses a high-severity proposer equivocation vulnerability in the Helix MEV Relay.","source":"GitHub: asymmetric-research/security-advisories","source_url":"https://github.com/asymmetric-research/security-advisories"},{"date":"2025-04-16","event":"LonelySloth reports a critical ZK ElGamal Proof program vulnerability in Solana's Token-2022 confidential transfer implementation. Asymmetric Research, Neodyme, and OtterSec review and support the patch; super-majority of validators adopt fix by April 18.","source":"Solana Foundation Post Mortem","source_url":"https://solana.com/news/post-mortem-may-2-2025"},{"date":"2025-05-05","event":"Solana Foundation publicly discloses the ZK ElGamal Proof vulnerability and patch. Community criticism emerges over the quiet, closed-door patch coordination process, raising decentralization concerns unrelated to Asymmetric Research's specific conduct.","source":"CoinDesk","source_url":"https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2025/05/05/solana-quietly-fixes-bug-that-could-have-let-attackers-mint-and-steal-certain-tokens"},{"date":"2025-09-17","event":"Asymmetric Research publicly discloses the Marginfi flash loan vulnerability, discovered by Felix Wilhelm. A new instruction bypassed repayment verification, putting over $160 million at risk. Patched before any exploit.","source":"Blockworks","source_url":"https://blockworks.co/news/marginfi-flash-loan-bug"},{"date":"2026-04-06","event":"Asymmetric Research and the Solana Foundation launch STRIDE (Solana Trust, Resilience and Infrastructure for DeFi Enterprises), a structured continuous security evaluation program for Solana DeFi protocols, days after the $270 million Drift exploit.","source":"CoinDesk","source_url":"https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2026/04/07/solana-foundation-unveils-security-overhaul-days-after-usd270-million-drift-exploit"},{"date":"2026-04-15","event":"Felix Wilhelm publishes a disclosure of a critical Solana p-token bug caught before mainnet deployment.","source":"Asymmetric Research blog","source_url":"https://blog.asymmetric.re/invocation-security-navigating-vulnerabilities-in-solana-cpis/"},{"date":"2026-04-22","event":"Asymmetric Research discloses the Across Protocol event spoofing vulnerability on Solana, which could have allowed attackers to trick relayers into filling unfunded orders.","source":"Asymmetric Research blog","source_url":"https://blog.asymmetric.re/"}]},"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision da14890b-f4e0-4ce6-ac63-b5d2544938ff - #2reviewby reviewerreviewer2026-09-02 00:36:47ZScore: 82 → 82 (no score change)The page's factual claims are, with minor exceptions, strongly corroborated by primary sources (the firm's own GitHub advisories and blog, Solana Foundation's official post-mortem, Stacks and Wormhole Foundation announcements) and independent Tier 1/2 press (CoinDesk, CoinTelegraph, Blockworks). All checked vulnerability disclosure dates, dollar figures, and outcomes (no funds lost) matched cited sources exactly. Two minor issues were found: one timeline citation links to an unrelated blog post rather than the correct source, and one bio claim (Jeff Schroeder lacking a public biography) understates that he does have an official team page and Crunchbase profile, albeit a thin one. No disputed or stale claims were identified, and no regulatory or fraud history was found independently, consistent with the page's own conclusion.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 443,561,317
- sig
5dapD6wg4jLt…8ork9nmhexplorer ↗- hash
6XonQwkjBe6P…bsoCcaJvsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (1268 B) ▸
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"5b452159421dfb1103168078a636ef7c","decided_at":"2026-09-02T00:36:47.151Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.0588,"investigation_id":"32e99313-f1cd-4ae6-aed7-c70d28b72801","new_score":82,"page_slug":"asymmetric-research","prev_score":82,"reason":"The page's factual claims are, with minor exceptions, strongly corroborated by primary sources (the firm's own GitHub advisories and blog, Solana Foundation's official post-mortem, Stacks and Wormhole Foundation announcements) and independent Tier 1/2 press (CoinDesk, CoinTelegraph, Blockworks). All checked vulnerability disclosure dates, dollar figures, and outcomes (no funds lost) matched cited sources exactly. Two minor issues were found: one timeline citation links to an unrelated blog post rather than the correct source, and one bio claim (Jeff Schroeder lacking a public biography) understates that he does have an official team page and Crunchbase profile, albeit a thin one. No disputed or stale claims were identified, and no regulatory or fraud history was found independently, consistent with the page's own conclusion.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 1ab8716f-e380-4b13-901f-895f66845d51 - #3review reviseby judgejudge2026-09-02 00:36:47ZScore: 82 → 77 (-5)The reviewer confirmed 31 of 35 claims with no disputed claims and a disputed_pct of 5.7%, which on its own would support approval. However, the review surfaced a high-priority coverage gap (coverage_gaps[0]): the page does not mention the December 2025 shared-leadership arrangement between Asymmetric Research and OtterSec, a material governance development involving one of the firm's own co-founders that readers evaluating the entity's structure would reasonably expect to see. Two smaller issues reinforce the need for a light revision rather than a clean pass: claim_findings[11] found the page understates Jeff Schroeder's public profile (he has an official team page and Crunchbase listing, not just a bare name mention), and claim_findings[21] identified a mismatched citation URL on the Solana p-token timeline entry, though the underlying fact it supports is independently confirmed elsewhere.anchoranchored
- chain
- ●mainnet-betaslot 443,561,336
- sig
2JCMMeMgQMHw…yXFEBC95explorer ↗- hash
2nKTQDWDUMk8…XsxCPjsMsha256 → base58
verifying row…full verify ↗canonical bytes (2443 B) ▸
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"5b452159421dfb1103168078a636ef7c","band_override":{"actual_delta":-5,"actual_verdict":"review_revise","disputed_pct":0.0588,"expected_delta_range":[0,0],"expected_verdict":"review_approve","rationale":"The reviewer confirmed 31 of 35 claims with no disputed claims and a disputed_pct of 5.7%, which on its own would support approval. However, the review surfaced a high-priority coverage gap (coverage_gaps[0]): the page does not mention the December 2025 shared-leadership arrangement between Asymmetric Research and OtterSec, a material governance development involving one of the firm's own co-founders that readers evaluating the entity's structure would reasonably expect to see. Two smaller issues reinforce the need for a light revision rather than a clean pass: claim_findings[11] found the page understates Jeff Schroeder's public profile (he has an official team page and Crunchbase listing, not just a bare name mention), and claim_findings[21] identified a mismatched citation URL on the Solana p-token timeline entry, though the underlying fact it supports is independently confirmed elsewhere."},"decided_at":"2026-09-02T00:36:47.151Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.0588,"investigation_id":"32e99313-f1cd-4ae6-aed7-c70d28b72801","new_score":77,"page_slug":"asymmetric-research","prev_score":82,"reason":"The reviewer confirmed 31 of 35 claims with no disputed claims and a disputed_pct of 5.7%, which on its own would support approval. However, the review surfaced a high-priority coverage gap (coverage_gaps[0]): the page does not mention the December 2025 shared-leadership arrangement between Asymmetric Research and OtterSec, a material governance development involving one of the firm's own co-founders that readers evaluating the entity's structure would reasonably expect to see. Two smaller issues reinforce the need for a light revision rather than a clean pass: claim_findings[11] found the page understates Jeff Schroeder's public profile (he has an official team page and Crunchbase listing, not just a bare name mention), and claim_findings[21] identified a mismatched citation URL on the Solana p-token timeline entry, though the underlying fact it supports is independently confirmed elsewhere.","score_delta":-5,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}Verify offline (run on your own machine)python -m src.verify_decision 702b7e96-e437-4a58-bafb-f2a8aa72bca0
How verification works. The “Row integrity” check above is computed in your browser — your machine recomputes the SHA-256 of the canonical bytes and compares against the stored hash. No avoid.net server can fake that check. The “full verify” link goes one level deeper: your browser fetches the on-chain transaction from a Solana RPC node and confirms the same hash is in the memo. If you don’t want to trust either avoid.net or the public RPC, run the CLI verifier on your own machine —
python -m src.verify_decision <event_id>.