Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← ALEX Lab4 decisions on this page

Audit log

Every state-changing event for ALEX Lab: moderation decisions on community submissions, plus corrections and updates from the news pipeline. URL-based decisions are designed to carry three independent witnesses — the original source, an Internet Archive snapshot, and a Solana memo signed by our publicly-disclosed publisher key. Archive coverage is still being backfilled, so each decision below reports its own snapshot status rather than assuming one exists.

  1. #1publishby system:backfill
    2026-05-28 04:23:28Z
    Score: ? → ? (no score change)
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 422,646,733
    sig
    23SSWpWvmRWe…KCT6TCctexplorer ↗
    hash
    sFCwp6QB1svC…PUApgFLbsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (6211 B) ▸
    {"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"de5ce8c2-e704-4380-9344-7a58d9ebba45","kind":"publish","page_slug":"alex","published_at":"2026-05-28T04:23:28.566Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"ALEX Lab","sections":[{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220117005119/en/Full-Service-Bitcoin-DeFi-Platform-ALEX-Launches-Mainnet-on-Stacks","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://decrypt.co/86082/stacks-based-crypto-project-alex-raises-5-8m-build-defi-bitcoin","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://whitestarcapital.com/companies/alex/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.gate.io/learn/articles/what-you-should-know-about-alex-lab/3416","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.coindesk.com/business/2024/05/15/bitcoin-defi-tool-alex-lab-loses-43m-in-hack-offers-10-bounty-for-stolen-funds","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.certik.com/resources/blog/alex","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://rekt.news/alexlab-rekt","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://coinfomania.com/alex-labs-confirms-major-security-breach-suspends-platform-operations-and-launches-full-investigation-into-multi-asset-hack","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cointelegraph.com/news/alex-labs-freezes-3-9-million-exploited-funds-cexs-after-hack","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptonews.com/news/alex-lab-links-4m-exploit-to-north-korea-backed-lazarus-group/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptoslate.com/bitcoin-defi-app-alex-lab-links-4-million-exploit-to-lazarus-group/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.cryptotimes.io/2024/06/25/alex-lab-uncovers-lazarus-groups-role-in-4-million-exploit/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://invezz.com/news/2024/06/25/defi-protocol-alex-labs-suspects-lazarus-groups-involvement-in-4m-hack/","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.halborn.com/blog/post/explained-the-alex-protocol-hack-june-2025","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.cryptotimes.io/2025/06/07/alex-protocol-loses-8-37m-in-hack-due-to-security-flaw/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://negg.blog/en/alex-protocol-loses-83-million-in-defi-bitcoin-exploit-on-stacks/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.guardrail.ai/blog/alex-protocol-hack-june-2025","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://unchainedcrypto.com/alex-lab-to-reimburse-users-after-8-3m-exploit/","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.theblock.co/post/357368/stacks-based-alex-lab-to-reimburse-users-after-8-3-million-exploit-as-token-drops-45","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://crypto.news/alex-protocol-announces-reimbursement-plan-for-users-hit-by-8m-exploit/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://medium.com/alexgobtc/distribution-of-alex-protocol-revenue-and-recovered-stx-35c8e359b874","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://unchainedcrypto.com/alex-lab-to-reimburse-users-after-8-3m-exploit/","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/alex-lab/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/alex-lab","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.certik.com/resources/blog/alex","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.halborn.com/blog/post/explained-the-alex-protocol-hack-june-2025","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://rekt.news/alexlab-rekt","type":"other","url":""}]}],"sources_used":[],"summary":"ALEX (Automated Liquidity Exchange) is a decentralized finance protocol built on the Stacks blockchain, designed to bring DeFi capabilities to Bitcoin. The protocol has suffered two major security exploits: a $4.3 million hack in May 2024 attributed to North Korea's Lazarus Group via a private key compromise of its XLink bridge, and an $8.3 million exploit in June 2025 caused by a smart contract access control vulnerability. In both cases, ALEX Lab Foundation pledged full user reimbursement, though partial recovery of 2024 stolen funds remained ongoing as of mid-2025, and the native ALEX token has declined approximately 99.9% from its all-time high.","timeline":[{"date":"2021-11-15","event":"ALEX raises $5.8 million in funding round led by White Star Capital","source":""},{"date":"2022-01-17","event":"ALEX launches mainnet on the Stacks blockchain","source":""},{"date":"2024-05-14","event":"XLink bridge private key compromised via alleged phishing attack; CertiK detects suspicious transaction","source":""},{"date":"2024-05-15","event":"ALEX Lab confirms $4.3 million exploit; offers 10% bounty for return of 90% of stolen funds; files Singapore Police report","source":""},{"date":"2024-05-18","event":"10% bounty deadline passes; ALEX Lab reports $3.9 million frozen at centralized exchanges","source":""},{"date":"2024-06-25","event":"ALEX Lab attributes May 2024 exploit to North Korea's Lazarus Group, citing ZachXBT's on-chain forensic investigation","source":""},{"date":"2025-06-06","event":"Second major exploit: $8.3 million drained via smart contract access control vulnerability in self-listing logic; ALEX token drops ~45%","source":""},{"date":"2025-06-17","event":"ALEX Lab Foundation announces completion of Treasury Grant Program; claims 100% USDC reimbursement to all affected users","source":""},{"date":"2025-07-01","event":"Farming resumed on ALEX protocol following security review","source":""}]},"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 7094f6fe-71e4-4ba6-a540-8d57c7545e53
  2. #2rescoreby systemsystem
    2026-10-10 18:47:41Z
    Score: 28 → 56 (+28)
    Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 28 → 56. Problems weighed by who is responsible: incidents the subject suffered −9.6, concerns that are not fraud −3.2, problems around the subject, caused by others −2.4; legitimacy credit long-running +6.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 455,367,649
    sig
    5vhQ8cBmh1N9…4zJ43JpTexplorer ↗
    hash
    pVvEQ2BU7wrg…gptiDDSZsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (635 B) ▸
    {"actor":"system","decided_at":"2026-10-10T18:47:41.553Z","decision":"rescore","investigation_id":"de5ce8c2-e704-4380-9344-7a58d9ebba45","new_score":56,"page_slug":"alex","prev_score":28,"reason":"Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 28 → 56. Problems weighed by who is responsible: incidents the subject suffered −9.6, concerns that are not fraud −3.2, problems around the subject, caused by others −2.4; legitimacy credit long-running +6.","score_delta":28,"score_model":"v2","sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 0fce7b42-8d04-4361-86e2-76bd33c50da6
  3. #3reviewby reviewerreviewer
    2026-10-27 19:25:55Z
    Score: 56 → 56 (no score change)
    The claims I could check hold up: the $4.3M figure and bounty terms from CoinDesk, the $3.9M freeze from Cointelegraph, and the June 2025 root cause, $16.18M estimate and audit-scope gap from Halborn. The page hedges the Lazarus attribution appropriately and flags the source discrepancies it found. I could not verify the exchange list, the Lazarus attribution details or the TVL figures. Two timeline entries have no source. I found no disputed claims and no status change that the page omits.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 462,188,404
    sig
    CPm3dvr9V8e6…THWB5jyQexplorer ↗
    hash
    8mGgpqFS3R4N…8eWSuCcFsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1337 B) ▸
    {"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"5503684f7d6601eec0acf2619015192b","blocked_count":2,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T19:25:54.930Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2857,"findings_hash":"8zpYMTiio474oqJa94FX569QvFJ6QfUuD1q5VSoKxB2","investigation_id":"de5ce8c2-e704-4380-9344-7a58d9ebba45","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":56,"page_content_hash":"2bca6b6b7f5716668e4e124f7fb93610fc6eab2f7ec1e78cefe70489c07b641f","page_slug":"alex","prev_score":56,"reason":"The claims I could check hold up: the $4.3M figure and bounty terms from CoinDesk, the $3.9M freeze from Cointelegraph, and the June 2025 root cause, $16.18M estimate and audit-scope gap from Halborn. The page hedges the Lazarus attribution appropriately and flags the source discrepancies it found. I could not verify the exchange list, the Lazarus attribution details or the TVL figures. Two timeline entries have no source. I found no disputed claims and no status change that the page omits.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":7,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 19742ece-f6f0-43f5-bdbf-016e1a94a9f4
  4. #4review reviseby judgejudge
    2026-10-27 19:25:55Z
    Score: 56 → 56 (no score change)
    Of 9 claims checked, 2 could not be verified because the source blocked the reviewer (claim_findings[4], [8]) and were left out of the count. Of the remaining 7, none were disputed and 2 were unverifiable (claim_findings[3] exchange list, claim_findings[7] unsourced timeline entries), giving about 29%, the minor-issues band. The core figures ($4.3M, bounty terms, $3.9M freeze, June 2025 root cause) were confirmed by Tier 1 and Tier 2 sources, and no omission or status contradiction was found, so the penalty is kept at the light end given the reviewer's low confidence.
    anchoranchored
    chain
    ●mainnet-betaslot 462,188,410
    sig
    mMx8zy18vpXb…16fRZTq5explorer ↗
    hash
    9HUp4vgqy8zn…KZkT1UMZsha256 → base58
    verifying row…full verify ↗
    canonical bytes (1248 B) ▸
    {"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"5503684f7d6601eec0acf2619015192b","band_override":null,"blocked_count":2,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T19:25:54.930Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.2857,"investigation_id":"de5ce8c2-e704-4380-9344-7a58d9ebba45","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":56,"page_slug":"alex","prev_score":56,"reason":"Of 9 claims checked, 2 could not be verified because the source blocked the reviewer (claim_findings[4], [8]) and were left out of the count. Of the remaining 7, none were disputed and 2 were unverifiable (claim_findings[3] exchange list, claim_findings[7] unsourced timeline entries), giving about 29%, the minor-issues band. The core figures ($4.3M, bounty terms, $3.9M freeze, June 2025 root cause) were confirmed by Tier 1 and Tier 2 sources, and no omission or status contradiction was found, so the penalty is kept at the light end given the reviewer's low confidence.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":7,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}
    Verify offline (run on your own machine)
    python -m src.verify_decision 10ec37cb-b174-4720-991d-ac2aa38f1370
How verification works. The “Row integrity” check above is computed in your browser — your machine recomputes the SHA-256 of the canonical bytes and compares against the stored hash. No avoid.net server can fake that check. The “full verify” link goes one level deeper: your browser fetches the on-chain transaction from a Solana RPC node and confirms the same hash is in the memo. If you don’t want to trust either avoid.net or the public RPC, run the CLI verifier on your own machine — python -m src.verify_decision <event_id>.