← $VLADreviewed 2026-11-01 · 11 claims checked
Fact-check findings
What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read $VLAD against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.
Read this first
These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.
“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.
Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.
disputed
1 claimThe reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. This is a lead, not a ruling that the claim is false.
- #8[disputed][awaiting moderator]in section: Financial Impact — Conflicting Figures
“the $22 million volume figure was corroborated independently in search summaries of The Block and Cointelegraph coverage”
reviewerThe $22 million volume figure was independently corroborated in The Block and Cointelegraph coverage.Direct fetches of both outlets contain no $22 million figure, so the claimed independent corroboration is not supported; the figure rests on The Defiant alone.Proposed correction (not yet applied)the $22 million volume figure was not found in the retrievable text of The Block or Cointelegraph coverage
partially supported
4 claimsThe cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.
- #3[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: July 2026 X Account Hijack and Fake Token Launch
“via a contract named PonsLaunchFactory on Pons, a pump.fun-style launchpad operating on Robinhood Chain”
reviewerContract was deployed about 46 minutes before the hacked post, via a contract named PonsLaunchFactory on Pons.The 46-minute figure and Pons are supported (Forklog, Defiant per search summary). The specific contract name PonsLaunchFactory was not found in any fetched source. - #4[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: July 2026 X Account Hijack and Fake Token Launch
“On July 28, 2026, Tenev said publicly that a fraudster had 'socially engineered X customer support' to gain access to his account, bypassing two-factor authentication and login notifications, and that the account had since been restored with additional safeguards.”
reviewerOn July 28, 2026 Tenev said a fraudster socially engineered X customer support, bypassing 2FA and login notifications; account restored with safeguards.Date, social engineering and safeguards confirmed; 'login notifications' detail not seen in the fetched extract (may be in full text). - #6[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Financial Impact — Conflicting Figures
“six times over about two hours”
reviewerCreator invoked fee-collection six times over about two hours, netting ~31.6 ETH plus ~72 million VLAD (~7% supply) into three new wallets.Core figures confirmed across the two outlets; the 'about two hours' duration was not found in either fetched extract. - #11[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Broader Robinhood Chain Memecoin Fraud Pattern
“Separate reporting described a coordinated scheme involving numerous token launches on Robinhood Chain allegedly amounting to a combined $18.43 million in losses, and reported that a major token-launch platform on the chain was shut down following an internal integrity review.”
reviewerReported $18.43 million coordinated rug pulls and a major launch platform shut down after internal integrity review.Both items exist per search results, but the cited pages themselves were not fetched and the shutdown source is not among the cited links. Low-tier sourcing.
confirmed
6 claimsThe cited evidence supports the claim as written.
- #1[confirmed][no action needed]in section: July 2026 X Account Hijack and Fake Token Launch
“Robinhood's communications team confirmed via its own X account that Tenev's account had been compromised and said it was 'working with X to restore access' and that the post had been removed.”
reviewerHack of Tenev's X account occurred July 23, 2026 and Robinhood said it was working with X to restore access and the post was removed.Date, Robinhood statement and explorer label all match The Block. - #2[confirmed][no action needed]in section: July 2026 X Account Hijack and Fake Token Launch
“The post included a token contract address and attracted more than 175,000 views in under 20 minutes before users identified it as a scam; it was later removed.”
reviewerPost drew more than 175,000 views in under 20 minutes.Supported by Cointelegraph. - #5[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Financial Impact — Conflicting Figures
“On-chain monitor 'MLM' estimated that wallets linked to the exploit withdrew roughly 650 ETH (about $1.2 million to $1.3 million), a figure also cited via Wu Blockchain.”
reviewerOn-chain monitor MLM estimated roughly 650 ETH (about $1.2-1.3 million) withdrawn, also cited via Wu Blockchain.Matches Cointelegraph. - #7[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Financial Impact — Conflicting Figures
“The Defiant additionally reported the token briefly reached a $2.6 million valuation with 5,266 holders, and that Uniswap trading volume exceeded $22 million with roughly 85,000 swaps within hours of the hacked post”
reviewerToken briefly reached $2.6 million valuation with 5,266 holders; Uniswap volume exceeded $22 million with ~85,000 swaps.Supported by The Defiant. - #9[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Disputed Valuation Peak
“none of which cite a $10 million peak; The Defiant instead reported a $2.6 million valuation”
reviewer$10 million peak valuation figure is not in The Block, Decrypt, Cointelegraph or Defiant; Defiant reported $2.6 million.My fetches also found no $10 million figure. - #10[confirmed][no action needed]in the timeline
“Robinhood Chain, Robinhood's Ethereum layer-2 network, launches its public mainnet.”
reviewerRobinhood Chain launched public mainnet July 1, 2026 (timeline).Timeline date is month-precision (2026-07) while evidence gives July 1; acceptable.
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.