Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · Hypervault Finance
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#4
Score
0 → 0 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
457508177
Off-chain at
2026-10-16T04:43:38.784Z
Anchored at
2026-10-16T04:43:45.816Z
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
2pCgx73LeXAC9Sa1UsLaTiXiBnhBTwebFyhNpXDhdCxc
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1910 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"e363adb42f92cfd06999e5d7527654af","decided_at":"2026-10-16T04:43:38.621Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2105,"findings_hash":"4Vp9nc5Q9FD1RiV1tUoLc6YR8ntxdEPtgZ3u1X7WAEV6","investigation_id":"45bd924e-7d36-44bb-b35a-d44591b0fa69","mode":"findings_only","new_score":0,"page_content_hash":"962a8830d8f2edb4dc010d7de703d1edb1897623f6af22775ce0058a650d00d6","page_slug":"hypervault-finance","prev_score":0,"reason":"The core narrative — a premeditated exit scam draining Hypervault's nine HyperEVM vaults around Sept 25-26, 2025, laundering proceeds through deBridge/Tornado Cash, and fabricating audit claims from Spearbit, Pashov and Code4rena — is well supported by Rekt News, The Block, Decrypt, and other contemporaneous outlets, and the page's hedged dollar ranges accurately reflect genuine disagreement between press figures ($3.6M) and deeper on-chain reconstructions (~$4.64M). Several smaller issues were found: a timeline date for the Zenith draft audit delivery (listed as Sept 21) conflicts with the page's own cited source, which places it around Sept 24; the operator's name is presented with 'Olsson' as primary when the weight of sourcing (including the cited Rekt News quotes) uses 'Olsen'; a TVL range in the Yield Promises section attributes a self-reported/inflated figure to DefiLlama; the claim of law enforcement filings in Singapore and South Korea is not corroborated anywhere, including in the page's own citations; and one archive_url in sources_used points to an unrelated Dogecoin article rather than the correct CoinCentral piece (no working Wayback snapshot could be found as a replacement). None of these rise to the level of undermining the central allegation, which is solidly documented.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}