Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · BigONE Exchange
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 24 → 24 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 425143574
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-08T16:05:55.914Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 2BoRcWoz5F6CGLKejsFWWH2gwg9G7oZBUdi2HXuy8aHe
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1073 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-08T16:05:55.735Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"9a595cf0-f69e-4a35-8bba-93a86ce51117","new_score":24,"page_slug":"bigone-exchange","prev_score":24,"reason":"The investigation is broadly factually grounded. Core claims about the July 2025 $27M supply-chain hack, ZachXBT's pig-butchering allegations, the 2018 Hacken wash-trading investigation, Trustpilot/TradersUnion scores, and leadership identities are all independently confirmed. The two notable weaknesses are: (1) Roger Ver's claimed backer/publicist role cannot be confirmed in any currently accessible source; and (2) the regulatory section materially omits BigONE's Kazakhstan AFSA FinTech Lab license, creating a false impression of zero regulatory engagement. Two cited URLs (CoinTelegraph and Hacken.io) returned 404 or similar errors, though the underlying claims they were cited for are confirmed by other sources.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}