Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Holoworld AI — AVA Token Insider Bundling Scheme
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 14 → 0 (-15)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 443517348
- Off-chain at
- 2026-08-25T22:17:16.319Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- FGjx6M5oWa514QPXXp5ZQMQSVQ7scgA79ertLzESjiWz
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1725 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T22:17:15.874Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"0a959a2e-0209-4d1a-88ab-83cbc7de3262","new_score":0,"page_slug":"holoworld-ai-ava-token-insider-bundling-scheme","prev_score":14,"reason":"Of the 23 individually fact-checked claims on this page, 14 were confirmed, 4 were partially supported, 1 was disputed, and 4 could not be verified either way, putting the disputed-or-unverifiable share at about 22% — within the range where a revision is warranted but not a takedown. The most consequential problem is claim_findings[6]: no independent report of Hologram Labs' 2022 seed round, other than the page's own cited source, lists Arthur Hayes as an angel investor, and every other outlet's investor list omits him. That is a factual claim about a named individual that the page cannot currently back up. Separately, claim_findings[2] and claim_findings[22], together with a high-priority coverage gap, show that the page's central 'insider bundling scheme' framing — used in the title and summary — rests on real, credibly sourced wallet-clustering data from Bubblemaps, but no cited source confirms the deployer wallet actually belongs to Holoworld/Hologram's own team rather than an unaffiliated third party who used the permissionless Pump.fun launchpad. Having that unresolved premise embedded in the page's title is a meaningful overreach beyond what the underlying reporting supports, even though the on-chain facts themselves are solid. Reviewer confidence was reasonably high (0.78), so this is not a case for leniency.","score_delta":-15,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}