Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · JELLY
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#3
Score
62 → 62 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
462278767
Off-chain at
2026-10-28T00:46:52.464Z
Anchored at
2026-10-28T00:47:16.000Z
Block time
2026-10-28T00:47:16.000Z

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
7RhKxg3vArKtHp2eMaKD4iN6w6sDfxkiu2gs1bWuLn65
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1341 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"29e85a6f3508d9a514bf8d93776cf660","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-28T00:46:52.408Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2,"findings_hash":"AJGsojiZFwyEYLdAwmfcxE7xbsmBGyXGCdzJy5zDL444","investigation_id":"a8402da3-b8e2-4106-9e39-00f3c9ebd6e6","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":62,"page_content_hash":"837858c7d32957032f6b938b85ba6ec271015fc6bdf3cae1fced099e75cad278","page_slug":"jelly","prev_score":62,"reason":"The core incident narrative (wallet sizes, $7.17M deposit, 429% pump, $6.26M withdrawn, $13.5M peak unrealized HLP loss, $0.0095 settlement) matches Arkham, Halborn, CoinDesk and Decrypt. Weaker points are the 2,800x launch multiple (Decrypt reports about 13.8x), the two-minute quorum timing, the short-entry-price coincidence, OKX listing and the uncited claim that Binance has not responded. Blockworks and CryptoTimes were blocked, so those claims were not scored. No shutdown or sanction found.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":10,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}