Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · Sei Network
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 58 → 58 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 425202155
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-08T22:35:04.056Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 2rUeQuoEAgvn2Ex7fRAzEpPS3z7sMRVGhmNnn4vFikc1
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1293 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-08T22:35:03.851Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"485aca9c-9bab-4e05-ae1b-305e5147466e","new_score":58,"page_slug":"sei-network","prev_score":58,"reason":"The reviewer computed a disputed_pct of 8.7% across 23 evaluated claims, with zero claims outright disputed and 11 confirmed by Tier 1 or strong Tier 2 sources. All major structural facts — the seed and growth-round figures, tokenomics allocation, airdrop controversy, bug bounty payouts, SIP-3 governance transition, and ETF filings — are well-supported. Two partially_supported findings carry editorial weight and should be corrected on revision: claim_findings[3] states block finality as ~300ms but official Sei documentation consistently states ~400ms, and claim_findings[20] omits that Solana (scoring 32) was selected alongside Aptos for the Wyoming WYST primary deployment while Sei (scoring 30) was limited to a pilot test phase. These are inaccuracies in a published page, not hallucinations or fabrications, and neither rises to a level that warrants denial or investigation status given the overall factual integrity of the page.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}