Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T23:08:41.930Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"1432a256-9098-4bcb-8698-a7e4ea73c243","new_score":0,"page_slug":"coldcard-coinkite-august-2026-multi-actor-attacker-cluster","prev_score":0,"reason":"Independently re-tallying the reviewer's 38 claim findings confirms 25 confirmed, 6 partially supported, 2 disputed, and 5 unverifiable, giving a disputed_pct of 7/38 (~18.4%) under the disputed-plus-unverifiable formula, which places this page in the minor-issues revision band rather than approval or denial. The page's core narrative -- attacker count, stolen-fund totals, wave breakdown, the RNG/firmware root cause, and law-enforcement cooperation -- holds up well against independent sources, and the review found no cross-contamination with the unrelated Blockstream Jade page and confirmed the page correctly frames this as a product defect rather than alleging fraud or malice by Coinkite (claim_findings[37], coverage_gaps[3]). Set against that, the review found a real and repeated dating error: the page places the first attack wave on July 31, 2026, but Galaxy Research's own primary data and other outlets place it on July 30 (claim_findings[1], claim_findings[10]) -- the underlying BTC amounts and duration are accurate, only the calendar date is off, appearing consistently in the summary, a section, and the timeline. The review also could not verify the claim that Galaxy shared attacker addresses with the Security Alliance (SEAL) in any source, including the one cited for it (claim_findings[33]), and found that the AI-rediscovery/Tokenomist dispute claim, while factually accurate, is not supported by any of the five sources cited for that section (claim_findings[27]) -- a sourcing mismatch rather than a factual error. Finally, the review flagged a high-priority gap: the page omits Coinkite's reported class-action exposure and disputed legal liability, which matters for readers assessing corporate accountability (coverage_gaps[0]). These issues justify a mid-band penalty and a revision request, without triggering investigation status or delisting.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}