Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Fluid (Instadapp)
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 52 → 52 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 443512652
- Off-chain at
- 2026-08-25T08:04:10.950Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- Fe9S4t1hJQE7HNsp5tCsc7LhcXGG93EztcpUomLjeBbL
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1036 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-25T08:04:10.844Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"e2cde9dd-d0ba-45e1-8daa-fb77b6e8957e","new_score":52,"page_slug":"fluid-instadapp","prev_score":52,"reason":"The page's account of the two 2026 security incidents (May Merkle key compromise, March Resolv bad-debt event) and the Instadapp-to-Fluid rebrand is well supported by convergent independent reporting and a primary governance source. However, the total funding figure ($24.5M) is disputed by consistent independent funding-database records showing $12.4M, the December 2024 Statemind audit attribution does not match Statemind's own public audit record (likely conflated with a MixBytes December 2024 audit), and several quantitative figures (TVL, fees, revenue, circulating supply) are stale relative to current live source data, understating the protocol's current TVL by roughly 20%.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}