Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · BlazeStake
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#2
Score
72 → 72 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
423482133
Off-chain at
2026-06-01T00:21:11.431Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
7kMKkQntGMTYYfDGomUxEmev4my8QiUFWYYU5kAVSDZN
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1288 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-01T00:21:11.212Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"3b11ad47-fb22-4e94-8358-15986f869130","new_score":72,"page_slug":"blazestake","prev_score":72,"reason":"The BlazeStake investigation is largely accurate and well-sourced. The most significant factual error is a recurring undercount of the spl-stake-pool audit total: the page states 'seven audits from five firms' throughout, but the official BlazeStake audits page and the anza-xyz security audits repository list eight audits. A secondary but notable issue is that the $155 million MarginFi single-day outflow claim overstates what is confirmed as a single-day figure (CoinDesk cites $80-100M on the resignation day; $155M is the multi-day net outflow). The Pavlovsky resignation date is one day off (April 10 vs April 11). The $278M TVL December 2023 claim cites a source that contains no TVL data. All other core claims — launch date, protocol mechanism, Custom Liquid Staking debut, validator distribution statistics, team pseudonymity, multisig governance, and the MarginFi dispute narrative — are confirmed by independent credible sources.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}