Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · luna
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 5 → 5 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 457843094
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-17T00:49:36.144Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-17T00:49:45.350Z
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- N4PZEFZ1JJ4GbcBZDswxSqrVYRyiJeH7EMpT4WUdQTQ
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (2310 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"9369a7834bce52f9a78f8f91f29a4a6f","decided_at":"2026-10-17T00:49:35.966Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.1579,"findings_hash":"Gtv82P1n2NcvagFVv2V1L1qUfXUS821RdFTWM99xPxJ6","investigation_id":"3ffc0ab5-51c0-4321-983e-cdb839be27de","mode":"findings_only","new_score":5,"page_content_hash":"55e49e54234ef8716038810069465a92590f4a36d274173fed29502de1e2e1de","page_slug":"luna","prev_score":5,"reason":"The page is substantially accurate on its core, heavily-documented claims: the SEC settlement figures, Do Kwon's charges/guilty plea/sentencing timeline, the Tai Mo Shan/$123M settlement, the $145M Genesis Stablecoins DOJ finding, and the Montenegro arrest and passport-forgery sentencing all check out against primary or highly credible sources, including two SEC press releases fetched directly and found live and accurate. The most significant defect is a dateline error: the page attributes the Jump Trading bitcoin-transfer allegations to 'a 2026 lawsuit' when the suit was filed in December 2025, apparently because the cited PANews article separately mentions a February 2026 Jane Street suit in the same piece. A second defect is a mischaracterization of when LFG accumulated its 80,000+ BTC reserve (the page implies it entered 2022 with that reserve already in hand; it was actually built up between February and May 2022). A third issue is an internal numeric inconsistency: the page states LUNA's all-time high as $119.51 in one section and $119.18 in its own timeline, with the page's higher-credibility cited source (Harvard/NBER) and independent price trackers favoring $119.18. There is also an unreconciled tension between the summary's 'one week' and 'three days' framings of the collapse timeframe — both independently sourced but not reconciled for the reader. One timeline entry (the Jan 2024 bankruptcy filing) cites a source that does not actually discuss that event, though the date itself is correct. No accepted community submissions exist for this page, so evidence_review is empty; coverage gaps include the absence of on-chain tracing, Terra 2.0's current status, and South Korean proceedings.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}