Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Pump.fun / Solana Memecoin Launchpad Ecosystem Fraud
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 12 → 4 (-8)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 443506608
- Off-chain at
- 2026-08-10T18:05:16.262Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- CYb89PPRMvNyqeeZWZbHbMMrJy8PftwtfeQWc7QGpDuK
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1732 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-10T18:05:15.972Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"69a41e0e-28ff-4f90-9582-ffabc9ed8fbc","new_score":4,"page_slug":"pump-fun-solana-memecoin-launchpad-ecosystem-fraud","prev_score":12,"reason":"The page's central allegations against Pump.fun -- the Solidus Labs finding that 98.6% of tokens show fraudulent characteristics, the SDNY securities and RICO class actions with MEV whistleblower evidence, the UK FCA warning, the livestream-abuse incidents, the celebrity memecoin collapses, and the 2026 GO bounty controversy -- were all independently confirmed by multiple credible sources (claim_findings[2], [4]-[6], [8]-[10], [13]-[16], [18]). Two issues keep this from a clean approval: claim_findings[1] found the stated 1.5 SOL graduation fee is contradicted by every independent source checked, which consistently report 0.015 SOL, a likely factual error (though a secondary economics detail, not a core allegation); and claim_findings[11] flagged that the DLA Piper citation supporting the June 2025 case-consolidation date is unarchivable and predates the event it's cited for. A handful of partially-supported claims (currency conflation in the 2017 EthereumCash figure, a one-day date discrepancy on the consolidation order, omission of Pump.fun's largest launchpad competitor and a 2025 livestream-feature revival) are minor framing gaps rather than disputed substance. With disputed_pct at 15% and reviewer confidence at 0.78, this falls solidly in the minor-issues band and does not warrant escalation to investigation status.","score_delta":-8,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}