Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
publish · SudoRare
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#1
Score
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
422980043
Off-chain at
2026-05-29T17:03:45.307Z
Anchored at
Block time

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
8kjoovaq7QmJDiEVBscTi4tMU53m5d9BJL9sLU1rsR2H
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (5753 chars)
{"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"16f41114-3792-46e0-ae26-05a1b65f934e","kind":"publish","page_slug":"sudorare","published_at":"2026-05-29T17:03:45.204Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"SudoRare","sections":[{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2022/08/23/looksrare-fork-sudorare-rugs-for-800k-despite-crypto-twitter-warnings","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://decrypt.co/108051/nft-project-sudorare-disappears-roughly-520-ethereum-user-funds","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.theblock.co/post/164970/nft-exchange-sudorare-suffers-800000-rug-pull-six-hours-after-launch","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.certik.com/resources/blog/3Udpk9kJW6rikLpgca3w3N-sudorare-incident-analysis","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptobriefing.com/nft-exchange-sudorare-goes-dark-820000-rug-pull/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptoslate.com/sudorare-developers-reap-815k-from-rug-pulling-project/","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptobriefing.com/sudorare-pulled-the-rug-for-820000-how-will-kraken-respond/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.certik.com/resources/blog/3Udpk9kJW6rikLpgca3w3N-sudorare-incident-analysis","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptobriefing.com/nft-exchange-sudorare-goes-dark-820000-rug-pull/","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2022/08/23/looksrare-fork-sudorare-rugs-for-800k-despite-crypto-twitter-warnings","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://decrypt.co/108051/nft-project-sudorare-disappears-roughly-520-ethereum-user-funds","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://medium.com/coinmonks/sudorare-rugged-but-are-we-surprised-anymore-c984a73984f0","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptobriefing.com/sudorare-pulled-the-rug-for-820000-how-will-kraken-respond/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://news.bitdegree.org/sudorare-disappears-from-the-web-with-around-815k-stolen-by-developers","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2022/08/sudorare-rugpull-amounts-to-820-k-in-losses","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.certik.com/resources/blog/3Udpk9kJW6rikLpgca3w3N-sudorare-incident-analysis","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://coindictate.com/sudorare-rugs-514-eth-six-hours-after-launch/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://news.coincu.com/119529-nft-exchange-sudorare-experiences-rug-pull/","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptobriefing.com/nft-exchange-sudorare-goes-dark-820000-rug-pull/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.certik.com/resources/blog/3Udpk9kJW6rikLpgca3w3N-sudorare-incident-analysis","type":"other","url":""}]}],"sources_used":[],"summary":"SudoRare was an anonymous NFT automated market maker (AMM) protocol launched on August 23, 2022, presented as a fork of SudoSwap and LooksRare. Approximately six hours after launch, the anonymous development team executed a premeditated rugpull via a backdoored smart contract, draining approximately 519 ETH (valued at $815,000–$852,000) from user deposits before deleting all online presence. Blockchain security firms PeckShield and CertiK traced a funding wallet to Kraken, but no public arrests or legal proceedings have been reported.","timeline":[{"date":"2022-08-21","event":"Ethereum wallet 0x814d receives 0.596 ETH from Kraken (exchange), later linked to SudoRare deployer by PeckShield.","source":""},{"date":"2022-08-23","event":"SudoRare launches on sudorare.xyz, opening liquidity pools accepting wETH, LOOKS, and XMON token deposits.","source":""},{"date":"2022-08-23","event":"Community members on Crypto Twitter, including @2shabby and @0xStanec, publicly flag SudoRare as a likely scam citing team anonymity, inflated followers, and high yields.","source":""},{"date":"2022-08-23","event":"Approximately six hours after launch, the deployer calls a backdoored smart contract function to drain 1,153,216 LOOKS, 6.014 XMON, and 200 WETH from the protocol, affecting 241 depositors.","source":""},{"date":"2022-08-23","event":"Stolen assets are converted to ETH and distributed equally across three wallets: 0x75c3b2...3981, 0x0498d1...8074, and 0xbFb784...7EAa (~173 ETH each).","source":""},{"date":"2022-08-23","event":"SudoRare website (sudorare.xyz), Twitter account, and all social media channels are deleted.","source":""},{"date":"2022-08-23","event":"PeckShield publishes on-chain tracing showing the deployer's funding wallet (0x814d) was funded by Kraken, stating 'The actor behind SudoRare rugpull seems a @krakenfx user.'","source":""},{"date":"2022-08-23","event":"CertiK publishes incident analysis confirming the backdoored upgrade mechanism and detailing the full fund flow to three recipient addresses.","source":""},{"date":"2022-08-24","event":"Major crypto outlets including CoinDesk, The Block, Decrypt, and CryptoBriefing publish coverage of the rugpull. Total estimated losses reported at $815,000–$852,000.","source":""}]},"v":1}