Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-26T23:08:35.889Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"088645b0-b093-42f2-bc92-1e51607a7328","new_score":0,"page_slug":"cryptozoo","prev_score":8,"reason":"An independent fact-check confirmed the bulk of this page's core narrative -- CryptoZoo's launch and collapse, the Coffeezilla investigation, the class-action dismissal, and the defamation suit -- against primary court records and independent reporting, and disputed_pct lands at 12.9%, just inside the low end of the revise range. However, the review found the page incorrectly credits lead developer Eduardo Ibanez with having 'held the game's source code hostage,' an allegation independent reporting attributes to a separately hired developer known as 'Z'/Zach Kelling, whom Paul says he blames only for hiring, not for withholding the code (claim_findings[2]). It also found an internal contradiction in the ZOO token's reported price collapse -- a >99.9% loss 'by mid-2022' cannot coexist with an '~87% decline in 2022 alone' (claim_findings[8]) -- and a role mischaracterization of Jake Greenbaum as 'co-founder' where sources more consistently describe him as a promoter/marketer (claim_findings[15]). Compounding these are a one-day-off dismissal date repeated throughout the page, a placeholder filing date off by 26 days, two dead source links (one already unarchivable per the page's own metadata), and a stale description of the Paul v. Findeisen trial that does not reflect that the scheduled date passed without proceeding. The page also understates remediation already completed -- roughly $1.9 million of the $2.3 million pledged buyback had reportedly been paid out, a fact favorable to the subject that the page omits.","score_delta":-13,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}