Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · LayerZero Labs
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 53 → 53 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464286995
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-02T00:04:03.712Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-02T00:04:30.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-02T00:04:30.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- BKZnHxC748417VPgTyfv8P2j8SEHBwTxJSRNqaGc8kJ4
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1432 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"b4257c9e65d7605a4b23489331da9e6f","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T00:04:03.626Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.1111,"findings_hash":"3HWFqzebhhN1S215D81iwz2m3RSocar3dER7ho3rTPKA","investigation_id":"52cfb889-0676-4834-abff-8a138199d778","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":53,"omissions":{"material":1,"total":2},"page_content_hash":"57ee934c68bf4017a13d8b30eb6f3fb9c424be19a3595d42b8277baf85571bca","page_slug":"layerzero-labs","prev_score":53,"reason":"The core incident narrative, LayerZero's May 2026 admission, the migration totals and the 47% OApp finding are supported by the cited sources. The main error is the Regulatory and Legal section, which says no court filings exist even though Evercrest (KelpDAO) sued LayerZero and Pellegrino in BC in September 2026, and that suit is the page's own accepted submission. The summary also presents KelpDAO's contested claim of LayerZero approval as fact, and the BitGo WBTC figure ($7.4B) matches neither cited CoinDesk article ($7.3B and $7.7B).","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":9,"sequence_num":4,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":true,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}