Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · Frank DeGods
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#2
Score
38 → 38 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
443526269
Off-chain at
2026-08-27T15:06:41.769Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
4DdSWfucHnapgfKsNZxFnn4KSPWUciKrZGdChRF97vgV
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1106 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-27T15:06:41.400Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"ae0c8775-0816-4136-9eac-da6dfef99126","new_score":38,"page_slug":"frank-degods","prev_score":38,"reason":"The large majority of the page's factual claims about DeGods/y00ts project history, migrations, the Season III failure, the $DEGOD token launch, the LIBRA/LA Vape Cabal allegations, and the 2025 resignation and wallet incident are corroborated by multiple independent contemporaneous sources, and the page is generally careful to frame contested allegations (wallet hack vs. self-liquidation, LIBRA insider trading) as unresolved rather than established fact. Two claims conflict with independently found figures (a doxxing date and a floor-price peak), one primary citation could not be retrieved to verify, and several granular figures (an apology quote, a fake-token rug-pull amount, an exact regulatory-denial quote) could not be independently confirmed.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}