Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · Zondacrypto
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 3 → 0 (-5)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 425416184
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-09T22:13:57.598Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 64GjhX9iKT9Kc75VqWzM3dcwLqJp4FGA42Vm7dexrT9N
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1575 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-09T22:13:57.343Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"f4781dff-6e37-4b1f-8f4a-513ddeb03985","new_score":0,"page_slug":"zondacrypto","prev_score":3,"reason":"The review examined 37 claims and found zero disputed claims, with 30 confirmed and 5 partially supported (disputed_pct: 2.7%). The core collapse narrative — on-chain wallet data, criminal investigation dates, FIU license suspension, supervisory board resignations, and political allegations — is overwhelmingly confirmed by Tier 1 and Tier 2 sources. The most material inaccuracy is in claim_findings[6]: describing Przemyslaw Kral as an 'American investor' conflates the U.S.-based acquisition vehicle with Kral's personal nationality (he holds Polish and Israeli citizenship). A secondary error appears in timeline item claim_findings[36], where the CPAC Poland event is dated March 2025 but occurred May 26–27, 2025. One claim (employee termination agreement wording) is unverifiable rather than confirmed. Two high-priority coverage gaps — independent on-chain verification beyond the commercially interested Recoveris firm, and the alleged hidden-control figure 'Marian W.' — represent meaningful omissions but do not invalidate existing confirmed claims. The page is approved with a minor score penalty reflecting the nationality mislabeling and date error; the coverage gaps should be addressed in a future revision.","score_delta":-5,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}