Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · AKT
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 72 → 67 (-5)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 425417243
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-09T22:20:56.029Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- Dt7bEAVNGzYp1hoVyoFhos59U9Be3RRKzqBEewdMJPhH
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1436 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-09T22:20:55.769Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"cb23f1c6-cc15-44aa-b9b9-2c81b01b5dce","new_score":67,"page_slug":"akt","prev_score":72,"reason":"The reviewer found 15 of 24 claims fully confirmed, zero disputed, and a reviewer-computed disputed_pct of 8.3%, which falls within the approve band. However, three factual inaccuracies in the partially-supported findings — (1) the founding date of Akash Network conflated with Overclock Labs (2015 vs. 2018) appearing in both the summary and timeline (claim_findings[0]); (2) the description of the Burn Mint Equilibrium model incorrectly framing stablecoin conversion when the mechanism actually replaces stablecoins with an internal credit (claim_findings[15]); and (3) sections[8] incorrectly placing the NVIDIA acquisition of Brev.dev in April 2024 when it occurred in July 2024 (claim_findings[20]) — warrant correction rather than approval without action. Additionally, a high-priority coverage gap identifies that the October 2025 Cosmos chain deprecation announcement, a fundamental architectural change, is entirely absent from the page. Together these push the verdict to revise rather than approve, with a modest penalty reflecting that no core risk or safety claims are affected.","score_delta":-5,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}