Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-26T11:32:52.731Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"6a784339-9712-41d2-8a47-0a6059ddf02f","new_score":14,"page_slug":"wemix-wemix-stablecoin","prev_score":22,"reason":"Independent fact-checking confirmed 33 of the page's 41 discrete claims outright, including all of the core allegations — hack amounts and dates, both South Korean court rulings, the CEO's verbatim disclosure-delay quote, and the delisting mechanics. The reviewer's disputed rate works out to 9.8% (claim_findings[19] a self-contradictory key-exposure timeline; claim_findings[21] a source citation attached to the wrong incident; claim_findings[4] an unverifiable user-growth figure), which on its own would fall just under the approval threshold. However, the review also flagged a high-priority gap: the page's section on the 2022 token-circulation controversy omits that former Wemade CEO Jang Hyun-guk was criminally indicted over that conduct and was acquitted, with the acquittal becoming final in December 2025 — an omission that leaves a named individual looking more culpable than the full record supports. Per the review protocol, a high-priority gap moves the verdict to revise even when the disputed rate is low, though it does not by itself justify escalating the page to under-investigation status, since that status is tied to the disputed-claim bands rather than to coverage gaps. Secondary issues — an overstated exchange-relisting timeline (claim_findings[26]), a journalist's list of possibilities misattributed as a direct WEMIX quote (claim_findings[10]), and a minor arithmetic conflation in the summary's loss figure (claim_findings[15]) — support a modest score reduction rather than denial.","score_delta":-8,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}