Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · Curve DEX
- Sequence
- #5
- Score
- 26 → 62 (+36)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 426514236
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-14T23:15:45.474Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 8iyKXWPVhazzSQaysxFCg29LivSAY7E26WZtPXN8oCFg
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1854 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-14T23:15:45.355Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"3e4567af-0a09-4107-b598-0cddbf8e26fa","new_score":62,"page_slug":"curve-dex","prev_score":26,"reason":"This is a severity-calibration review, not a fact-dispute review: all six claim_findings are supported and disputed_pct is 0%. The page content stands as accurate and must remain published. The review establishes with high confidence (0.88) that the current WARNING-band score over-penalizes Curve Finance on three grounds: (1) the July 2023 $70M exploit originated from a Vyper compiler bug, a third-party failure not attributable to Curve protocol design, and 73% of funds were recovered (claim_findings[0-1]); (2) the $10M bad debt generated by the June 2024 founder liquidation was fully repaid by Egorov personally within days, making any framing of it as an unresolved community loss inaccurate (claim_findings[2]); and (3) the VC fraud lawsuit was dismissed by a California appeals court in February 2025, removing it as an active fraud indicator (claim_findings[3]). Curve continues to operate with approximately $1.43B TVL and $126B annual volume (claim_findings[4]), and the 2025 X-account and DNS incidents were infrastructure-layer attacks that did not breach its smart contracts (claim_findings[5]). Material caveats remain — ongoing Swiss proceedings, founder governance-token concentration, and a pattern of infrastructure security breaches — which correctly place the entity in the CAUTIONARY band rather than SAFE. A score_modifier_delta of +36 moves the score toward the reviewer-recommended 62 (CAUTIONARY), correcting the mis-calibration from the current over-penalized WARNING band.","score_delta":36,"sequence_num":5,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}