Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 72 → 72 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 443524019
- Off-chain at
- 2026-08-27T05:39:04.131Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 8z9geR6aVEjyaXdbiwLJvTw8my4oHLjcgS8omBx6cqht
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1387 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-27T05:39:04.039Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"bb517309-c0a3-4700-aa9e-b7d4a3c9ce6d","new_score":72,"page_slug":"janus-henderson-anemoy-aaa-clo-fund-jaaa","prev_score":72,"reason":"The page makes no adverse allegation specific to the JAAA fund itself; its only adverse material (an FCA fine of a corporate predecessor, Henderson Investment Funds Limited, for an unrelated retail-fund matter a decade before JAAA existed) is precisely sourced and explicitly, fairly caveated as not implicating the current product. Institutional role attribution (fund vehicle, Investment Manager, Sub-Investment Manager, tokenization provider) was independently verified against the fund's own rating report and is correct and specific to JAAA, unlike a sibling page's error on a related fund. The main defects found are five date errors — three surrounding a Kraken Custody/Ethena news cluster in June 2026 where the page's own cited articles state different (earlier) announcement dates than the page uses, and one Particula rating date (Nov 1 vs. the source's Nov 4-5) — plus one overstated claim that extends a JTRSY-specific Wintermute liquidity partnership to JAAA without support from the cited source.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}