Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review_revise · Remora Markets
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#3
Score
2816 (-12)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
443520641
Off-chain at
2026-08-26T11:41:49.364Z
Anchored at
Block time

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
HiPDQRs71z7z7iBD8EfMVzTnS5Rd79eDc8snRzvPQaiR
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1599 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-26T11:41:49.127Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"a587cbef-2ae8-42d1-9ea1-e6c1492fa99f","new_score":16,"page_slug":"remora-markets","prev_score":28,"reason":"The page's core identity and central narrative -- Remora Markets as former Moose Capital, acquired by Step Finance in December 2024, and shut down in February 2026 after a $27-40 million treasury hack -- are independently corroborated by multiple tier-1 outlets and are not the product of mistaken identity or circular sourcing. However, one timeline entry (claim_findings[31]) carries a citation that is wrong by about eight months, attributes a $110 million revenue figure to the source that does not appear there, and mischaracterizes a 'year-to-date' growth figure as 'year-over-year.' A related claim about $14 million in losses from other incidents (claim_findings[28]) also could not be traced to any cited or independent source. A citation supporting a high-severity claim about how quickly the treasury was drained (claim_findings[25]) is dead and unarchivable. The page also does not address that one of its own cited sources describes Remora as having already begun reimbursing holders, which sits in tension with the page's framing of unresolved redemption risk (claim_findings[29], flagged as a high-priority gap). These are real but bounded defects against an otherwise well-sourced page, warranting revision rather than removal.","score_delta":-12,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}