Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · OFAC ISIS-K 134-Address SDN Batch (July 2026)
- Sequence
- #6
- Score
- 0 → 0 (-16)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 462175505
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-27T18:40:22.952Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-27T18:40:34.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-27T18:40:34.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 2RVQLxmYaSpXwk3Mf8NsV6YqmNHyGcEGwx1d1TtRQYXW
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1448 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"e4408f94cb38d7b6bf260e6181efb238","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T18:40:22.609Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.3636,"investigation_id":"cc3a88d5-1ffa-41bd-b385-ee5e1f6acec5","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"page_slug":"ofac-isis-k-134-address-sdn-batch-july-2026","prev_score":0,"reason":"The page's core facts were confirmed against OFAC and other sources: the July 1, 2026 date, the 134 addresses (131 TRON, 3 Monero), the Tether freeze, the $1.4M and $880K figures, and the June 22 action (claim_findings[0], [1], [8], [9]). However, 4 of 11 claims (about 36%) were disputed or could not be verified: the 2015-09 ISKP designation date and its Treasury citation (claim_findings[4], [5]), and the 'largest single-day' and '$10 to $15,000' claims, for which no source was found (claim_findings[2], [3]). Three further claims are real but cite pages that do not contain them (claim_findings[6], [7], [10]). Because the problems are in secondary details and citations rather than the central allegation, the penalty is set at the low end of the significant band.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":-16,"sequence_num":6,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}