Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Mori Finance
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 50 → 50 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 462179076
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-27T18:53:03.485Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-27T18:53:08.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-27T18:53:08.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- A7EBtm2sRJS6No8xKCtwHrtZpk6yTxiJA2uoby4PXqxZ
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1283 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"2b46757a50ec680105820bf14907397c","blocked_count":3,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T18:53:03.387Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.1429,"findings_hash":"3kwRMAKiYSgA2tVyZ7Uy7rTF7SE3AYdBxdvp8u6d1JNc","investigation_id":"e4dbe003-3223-4cf1-802d-54feb6701458","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":50,"page_content_hash":"208e9e8e4c5cd4e3968882942287555ae9912d75c96ebc8bd7e1177b7555f916","page_slug":"mori-finance","prev_score":50,"reason":"The sale dates, amounts and tokenomics figures match Holder.io. One discrepancy is the first-sale duration (page says under two minutes, Holder.io says under five). Several key claims (TVL, the PeckShield mention, the no-team-allocation statement, the last X post) could not be read because their sources returned 403. The page's dormancy conclusion is plausible and hedged, and I found no evidence of a shutdown, exploit or sanction.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":7,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"unknown","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}