Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Ethereum Classic
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 42 → 42 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 426514700
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-14T23:16:09.973Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- HGgkRjW24KtbkzeRjaDVd299aNY7G3SXjVrMHNtUkKk8
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1969 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-14T23:16:09.909Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"2ae2325a-238e-4228-b183-6f8ca733d750","new_score":42,"page_slug":"ethereum-classic","prev_score":42,"reason":"Blue-chip calibration review (Prompt A). Verdict: over-penalized. Page content is treated as accurate; the trust_score band is miscalibrated. Ethereum Classic is a legitimate, long-running proof-of-work blockchain (operational since 2016) that suffered external 51% attacks in 2019 and 2020 — incidents it was the victim of, not the perpetrator. Those attacks are now 4-6 years old and have been substantially mitigated by the ~7-8x hashrate increase following Ethereum's 2022 Merge, which is confirmed by multiple sources. The current WARNING band (20-49) requires either 'elevated fraud/loss risk' or 'unresolved severe incident'; neither condition applies — the security incidents are resolved, and there is zero evidence of fraud, Ponzi mechanics, or exit scam. Material caveats that do justify a CAUTIONARY rating include: (1) extremely minimal DeFi ecosystem (~$74.6K TVL, not the $150K stated), (2) contentious on-chain governance via the Olympia proposal still in development, (3) no explicit SEC/CFTC classification (though the March 2026 joint framework did not name ETC, the broader regulatory environment has evolved), and (4) a small-cap coin with heavy speculative price exposure. A score of 58/CAUTIONARY properly reflects a legitimate operator with material structural caveats, without penalizing it for being a victim of attacks it has since defended against. Two specific factual inaccuracies on the page — hashrate stated as '300+ TH/s' (current: ~165-198 TH/s) and TVL stated as '~$150K' (current: ~$74.6K) — modestly reduce confidence in the page's precision but do not change the band direction.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}