Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T23:08:26.520Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"6c69efb6-4853-4cbe-a95d-2e4e49b18bd5","new_score":2,"page_slug":"taj-tarsha-few-and-far-limited","prev_score":2,"reason":"Recomputing the reviewer's own numbers gives 24 confirmed, 4 partially supported, 3 unverifiable, and 0 disputed out of 31 claims (claim_findings[0-30]). By the disputed_pct formula (disputed + unverifiable) / total, that is 3/31 = 9.68%, which falls just under the 10% threshold for approval rather than at the reviewer's rounded 10% figure. No claim was found to be disputed by a contradicting credible source. The two categories of concern that were checked most closely for a page naming an individual under federal indictment both came back clean: all four direct quotations attributed to the defendant and his fiancée, plus the defense's 'business failure is not a crime' statement, were independently confirmed as accurately attributed (claim_findings[15], [16], [11]), and personal liability is consistently kept separate from the company's corporate conduct throughout, including in the Risk Factors section (claim_findings[27]). Two partially supported findings show the page compresses the FAR token's roughly year-long decline into language suggesting an immediate post-launch collapse (claim_findings[8], [23]) -- a real overstatement of pace, though not a fabricated outcome, since the token did in fact end up worthless. One unverifiable finding is an uncited editorial line calling SDNY 'one of the most aggressive federal venues,' presented inside a section framed as 'confirmed by federal indictment' (claim_findings[26]) -- this is the page's own voice, not a sourcing gap, and should be corrected or clearly attributed as commentary. The other two unverifiable findings are artifacts of blocked/erroring fetches (a 403 on the DOJ release, a 503 on CoinMarketCap) rather than substantive contradictions. None of the five coverage gaps are marked high priority, so per the review bands they support future expansion rather than a lower verdict.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}