Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T22:57:01.254Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"7f3566f6-b222-4575-8585-455856068743","new_score":0,"page_slug":"irs-fake-digital-asset-compliance-portal-letter-campaign-2026","prev_score":0,"reason":"Recounting the reviewer's own claim_findings array (34 entries, not the 36 stated in its summary block) gives 31 confirmed, 2 partially_supported, 1 unverifiable, and 0 disputed. Applying the disputed_pct formula correctly (disputed + unverifiable over total, excluding partially_supported) yields 1/34 = 2.9%, well inside the 0-10% approve band. No claim was found to be disputed, mitigation and victim-guidance content was checked line by line and confirmed to match primary-source advice with no inverted instructions, and the IRS is consistently framed as the impersonated party rather than an actor (claim_findings[0]-[27] throughout). The two partially_supported items are minor: claim_findings[16] shows a quote from IRS-CI's Koopman that drops a trailing clause without ellipsis but does not change its meaning, and claim_findings[21] flags a withdrawal-freeze security tip as a reasonable but not explicitly sourced elaboration on confirmed exchange-security guidance. The single unverifiable item, claim_findings[33], is a timeline entry that cites AVOID.NET itself as the source for an August 7 'no arrests reported' claim -- a circular sourcing practice worth correcting, though the underlying fact is corroborated by every other source reviewed. Coverage gaps are all medium or low priority, so none push the page toward revision. Reviewer confidence (0.88) was the highest of this review run.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}