Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · USDGO
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 74 → 74 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 443524224
- Off-chain at
- 2026-08-27T06:07:58.075Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 689UGekNbpke3DfMBNbKGnnWJwAuSpttSRTghNVVnPn6
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1356 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-27T06:07:57.880Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"b5efeb83-9597-48f8-8e97-837e0ec342b9","new_score":74,"page_slug":"usdgo","prev_score":74,"reason":"USDGO is a real, actively traded, bank-issued stablecoin, and the great majority of the page's factual claims about its issuer, distributor, regulatory framework, reserve structure, and launch/growth milestones were independently corroborated against primary press releases, OCC/FDIC filings, and exchange notices. The page correctly distinguishes attestation from audit, a distinction other pages reportedly conflate. The main weaknesses found are: one disputed launch date (page says Feb 9, 2026; two independent primary sources say Feb 10, 2026), an unverified 'top six regulated stablecoins' ranking sourced only to the issuer's own PR, a material omission of Anchorage Digital Bank's 2022-2025 OCC consent order for BSA/AML deficiencies from the fraud/enforcement section, incomplete exchange-listing coverage (a Kraken listing was found independently but not mentioned), and a couple of claims (the on-chain contract address, ATH/ATL figures) that could not be independently verified with the tools available.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}