Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · Axiom (Solana DEX)
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 32 → 32 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 443505506
- Off-chain at
- 2026-08-08T02:30:31.537Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- DJ8nSHt6KcMBTBUwHNcMoU7yEEnP4g4zoZ7e6MSSuvmY
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1397 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-08T02:30:31.327Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"c1488028-9df4-4f5c-8b6c-11361c5e40b4","new_score":32,"page_slug":"axiom-solana-dex","prev_score":32,"reason":"The reviewer examined 25 discrete claims and found zero outright disputes; 18 were fully confirmed by Tier 1 or Tier 2 sources and 4 were partially supported. The partially supported claims involve minor framing issues — a one-month timing discrepancy in the $100M revenue milestone (claim_findings[3] and [23]), an omitted ZachXBT denial regarding a Pump.fun wallet connection (claim_findings[16]), and a slightly stale regulatory framing where the CFTC Polymarket investigation is characterized as merely 'urged' when it had already commenced by the page's stated review cutoff (claim_findings[20]). None of these affect the page's core allegations, which are solidly anchored to Tier 1 sources including Forbes, CoinDesk, and The Block. One link-rot finding (Blockworks URL returning 403) is non-critical because every claim attributed to that source is independently confirmed elsewhere. The high-priority coverage gap on on-chain victim loss quantification is noted for future expansion but does not impair the page's current accuracy.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}