Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · Luna Yield
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#2
Score
2 → 2 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
423516475
Off-chain at
2026-06-01T04:08:37.472Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
2xYCJYMV8Eq3VGNLvWamS5XdeZ7kf9MyBrsFHEREHSne
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1299 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-01T04:08:37.260Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"2f446d9c-abff-4973-a377-f4ab2a602098","new_score":2,"page_slug":"luna-yield","prev_score":2,"reason":"The Luna Yield investigation page is well-sourced and factually accurate across all material claims. The primary figures — $6,709,834 stolen, 60% IDO compensation in USDC, Tornado Cash routing, anonymous team, first major Solana rug pull — are confirmed by multiple independent outlets including CoinDesk (Tier 1) and five Tier 2 crypto news publications. Three claims are rated partially_supported due to minor imprecision: the 'approximately two days' timeline (defensibly accurate depending on whether the IDO or farming-pool-open date is used as the reference), the Aug 17 farming launch date (consistent with 'Tuesday' characterizations but not explicitly separated from Aug 16 in sources), and the IDO raise described as 'LUNY token sales' (investors paid USDC to receive LUNY, not vice versa). No disputed or unverifiable claims were found. The zero disputed_pct and broad cross-source corroboration indicate high reliability of the core narrative.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}