Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T22:21:45.040Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"0180d047-73a2-45da-9503-dfef6cc4ea9d","new_score":0,"page_slug":"q2-2026-defi-record-hack-wave","prev_score":0,"reason":"Of 38 fact-checked claims, 30 were confirmed against primary sources, 4 were disputed, and 4 were partially supported. Disputed claims come to 4/38 = 10.5%, which sits just above the 10% approval threshold, so this page is judged on the revise band rather than approved outright. None of the disputes touch the core allegations — the KelpDAO, Drift, Humanity Protocol, and THORChain hack narratives and their North Korea attributions all check out against primary sources (claim_findings[6]-[9], [11]-[15], [16]-[20], [21]-[22]). The disputed items are: a quoted phrase attributed to two named outlets that appears in neither (claim_findings[24]); a governance-migration date on the Drift page that is conflated with the later attack date (claim_findings[13]); a $14 billion DeFi-withdrawal figure correctly reported but wrongly attributed to CoinTribune instead of its actual source, which is already cited elsewhere on the page (claim_findings[30]); and a $1.3 million 'second Aztec Connect hack' figure that appears to be a duplicated Raydium figure, with the real second Aztec incident closer to $2.1-2.2 million (claim_findings[32]). Separately, the page's headline number — 83 incidents and $755 million in Q2 2026 losses — is the majority figure across outlets but is presented as settled when at least three credible sources, including one already in the page's own source list, report different totals (70-85 incidents, $746M-$775M) (claim_findings[0], [3]). A related TVL claim overstates how quickly Aave's TVL fell (claim_findings[29]), and a market-cap figure is not actually contained in its cited source (claim_findings[31]). None of the four coverage gaps are marked high priority, and the reviewer flagged a sibling AVOID.NET page covering the same quarter with unreconciled figures as a medium-priority, not urgent, issue. Taken together this supports revision rather than denial or clean approval: the page's core factual scaffolding holds, but its headline figure needs a caveat, several attributions need correcting, and it should be reconciled with the sibling page.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}