Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · xToken
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 56 → 56 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464445310
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-02T09:29:23.654Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-02T09:29:44.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-02T09:29:44.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 6JTK4ZrULk2Di8UuRURTNQvYu28Jcm5Lm5z4dRdvmAog
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1212 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"b0265ece28da6c02567ccaa93db093c5","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T09:29:23.588Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2857,"findings_hash":"8wkyUC3E7jYz2X4frZNwAtkeArdjuu8PQeS3HT94jsdL","investigation_id":"e1f52b35-22bd-40ff-b8ca-12bded5dbd8d","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":56,"page_content_hash":"2948e411ef33838d7a5145a603ccd983425836104d82ae889b47502ec51397b2","page_slug":"xtoken","prev_score":56,"reason":"The core exploit facts (amounts, flash loan sizes, asset breakdown, access-control flaw, audit timing) match rekt.news and Halborn. Weak points are the unsourced ZachXBT flag and 10/100 trust score, a 99.84% figure that does not match the stated price, and the unverified compensation and price data. Current status was not established. Only a few sources were fetched.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":7,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"unknown","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}