Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Sequence
#4
Score
62 → 62 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
459444930
Off-chain at
2026-10-21T01:25:11.643Z
Anchored at
2026-10-21T01:25:30.014Z
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
7GEdXNV83AXVroQEp9Gu88hgaDNj7m9xZHVYubLE4vHg
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1912 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"5fa5a126b63f94d13ba044b608101edf","decided_at":"2026-10-21T01:25:11.489Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.4286,"findings_hash":"JBZEXrffcosiYbBFMZzT9BVnGAZjHeGyPkTbdG97fBmA","investigation_id":"c07c4d35-4f89-4ac0-a908-6709466ea111","mode":"findings_only","new_score":62,"page_content_hash":"eda4c3ac1d54578c5e5ee3c52b7fe7f2341a866248737b7ecddd32751b5cab7a","page_slug":"jupiter-exchange","prev_score":62,"reason":"The page's core narrative — Jupiter's dominant market position, the racial slur incident, the Jupuary airdrops, the governance crisis and DAO voting pause, the acquisition spree, the X account hack, the LIBRA memecoin episode, the Jupiter Lend 'zero contagion' retraction, and the ASR seed-phrase controversy — is well supported by credible, largely live sources and matches independent reporting closely. The most significant problems found are: an unsupported claim that Meow co-founded Kyber Network (the cited source and external records point to Loi Luu instead); a timeline date for the Catstanbul acquisitions that reflects a follow-up article's publish date rather than the actual event date; a sentence re-characterizing the X-hack's $20M peak market cap figure as confirmed 'trader losses,' which the cited sources do not support; an unverified 'fastest TVL growth of any Solana lending protocol' superlative; and an unresolved identity claim equating 'Siong Ong' with 'Ming Ng' that could not be confirmed and may reflect conflation of two distinct co-founders. The regulatory section leans on a source that does not mention Jupiter at all. None of these issues are severe fabrications; they are overstatements, mis-sourced details, and one clear date error, in an otherwise diligently sourced page.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}