Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Sequence
#3
Score
8282 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
443523616
Off-chain at
2026-08-27T04:12:50.216Z
Anchored at
Block time

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
qzkwNQsEV5P9Pph8wM7LvBzENp2AvYi8CTkkcchCrD6
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1553 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-27T04:12:49.907Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"d524c5e4-dc63-4b7b-8252-1add9d3d6a26","new_score":82,"page_slug":"janus-henderson-anemoy-treasury-fund-jtrsy","prev_score":82,"reason":"Of 44 individual claims fact-checked against primary and credible secondary sources, none were found to be disputed and none were link-rotted or stale; the page's disputed rate is 9.1% ((0 disputed + 4 unverifiable) / 44), which falls in the approve range. The four unverifiable items are two claims that are inherently unprovable by their nature (an absence claim that no exploit has ever occurred, and a legal characterization under BVI law) and two precision gaps on non-adverse statistics (an industry growth-rate figure and an exhaustive chain list), none of which contradict anything the page says. Institutional roles among Anemoy Capital SPC, Anemoy Asset Management, Janus Henderson, and Centrifuge, and the details of Janus Henderson's 2026 take-private merger, were each verified precisely against primary sources. The review separately raises, as a high-priority observation rather than a factual defect, that this page contains no adverse allegation against any named party -- a legitimate question about whether this entity belongs in a risk index at all, but that is an editorial-scope question, not an accuracy question, and does not change this verdict.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}