Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · Safe{Wallet}
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 68 → 68 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 425418418
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-09T22:28:38.291Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 3VNAQjPnPKnCyv83dgmcqPANAFKk5XFtyxhphtJ19nXq
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1336 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-09T22:28:37.930Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"8eb20d93-59f9-4e55-92e2-19a221de6836","new_score":68,"page_slug":"safe-wallet","prev_score":68,"reason":"The review found 21 of 27 claims confirmed, with a reviewer-computed disputed_pct of 7%, placing this page in the approve band (0-10%). The single outright disputed claim (claim_findings[21]) concerns the SAFE governance token launch date — the page states April 20, 2022, which was actually the Foundation's internal vesting start date, not the September 28, 2022 public launch; this is a secondary historical detail, not a core allegation about the attack, attribution, or scope. The three partially-supported claims involve minor organizational timeline nuances and a composite technical claim confirmed across two separate forensic sources. All central allegations — the Bybit hack mechanics, FBI attribution to TraderTraitor, forensic timeline, scope of compromise, and Safenet launch — are confirmed by Tier 1 sources including the FBI IC3 PSA and official Safe Foundation statements. No link rot was found, no high-priority coverage gaps exist, and reviewer confidence is 0.87.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}