Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T03:31:59.803Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"8f0542af-7d21-4d5f-b093-5d8c6bf8f3c1","new_score":0,"page_slug":"bitcoin-latinum","prev_score":4,"reason":"The page's central narrative -- the SEC's 2026 fraud complaint against Donald Basile and Bitcoin Latinum, the prior investor lawsuits, celebrity promotions, and the token's collapse -- checks out against the cited sources, with 40 of 47 checked claims confirmed and only 2 disputed (claim_findings[5], claim_findings[39]). That keeps the page well inside the approve band on disputed volume alone. It is moved to a revise verdict because both disputed items are clean, independently-verifiable factual errors rather than matters of interpretation, and both are flagged as high-priority coverage gaps: the SEC complaint's venue is misstated as the Southern District of New York when multiple sources place it in the Eastern District of New York, and the defamation suit against journalist Cyrus Farivar is wrongly described as filed by 'entities associated with Arshad Assofi' when independent sources show Assofi was actually an adverse party in a separate suit against the company, not connected to the defamation filing. That second error misplaces a named individual on the wrong side of litigation, which warrants correction even though it doesn't touch the page's core fraud allegations. A stale bracelet count for Phil Hellmuth and two minor date/detail imprecisions (claim_findings[22], claim_findings[30]) are noted but do not independently affect the verdict.","score_delta":-8,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}