Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Tether
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 45 → 45 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 426514979
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-14T23:16:24.754Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 4qeabvu5xdXyKUc8vdnYG583moGWkuNPrj2oKr4TVeUS
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1820 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-14T23:16:24.700Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"0e3605d0-c29f-493c-89d4-6c756264a7eb","new_score":45,"page_slug":"tether","prev_score":45,"reason":"Blue-chip calibration review (Prompt A). Verdict: over-penalized. Page content is treated as accurate; the trust_score band is miscalibrated. Tether is a legitimate, operating stablecoin issuer — not a scam, Ponzi, or exit — that has paid two material regulatory fines (CFTC $41M, NYAG $18.5M) for documented misrepresentations about reserve backing between 2016 and 2019. Those violations are real, confirmed, and appropriately incriminating. However, the entity continued operating, settled without fraud convictions, now publishes quarterly BDO Italia attestations, and in March 2026 engaged KPMG for the first full Big Four audit — significant transparency steps absent from the page. The page's $80B+ market-cap figure is approximately 60% stale (current ~$185B), its timeline misstates the critical terms-change year as 2018 rather than 2019, and it omits the 2024 DOJ AML/sanctions probe entirely. The 2017 $31M hack is an external theft suffered by the entity and should not drive the score downward as owner-fraud. Balancing confirmed prior-period regulatory violations (warranting a material caveat) against the absence of fraud convictions, the entity's continued legitimate market function, and recent transparency progress, a score of 52 in the CAUTIONARY band is appropriate: legitimate operator with material, documented, but now-partially-resolved caveats. A score of 45/WARNING overstates current fraud risk relative to the evidence standard in the band policy.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}