Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Dabai Guarantee
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 2 → 0 (-8)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 461978986
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-27T07:03:25.484Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-27T07:03:57.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-27T07:03:57.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 7AdBQDs5zc1kjW9srkv9WTrrongmX4XwAG6qfpyLyQPF
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1338 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"06ec71d03d9b7188d590e97ca23effec","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T07:03:25.056Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.1667,"investigation_id":"ddc342a3-e804-4fbb-abd2-46f783da0afe","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"page_slug":"dabai-guarantee","prev_score":2,"reason":"Of 11 claims checked, 1 was disputed (claim_findings[0]) and 1 could not be verified (claim_findings[9]), giving a disputed rate of about 18%, in the minor-issues band. The disputed claim turns a commonly observed 500 USDT deposit into a platform-wide minimum that the Recorded Future source does not state. Two further claims are overstated but substantially supported: the Xinbi freeze began September 8, a day before the OFAC designation (claim_findings[6], [7]), and Tajin Group's Xinbi deposit was self-reported (claim_findings[5]). The core Recorded Future facts check out, the reviewer found no shutdown or sanction of Dabai, and no omissions were reported, so the penalty is modest.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":-8,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}