Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review_approve · Kok An / Crown Resorts / Anco Brothers
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#3
Score
2 → 2 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
425412428
Off-chain at
2026-06-09T21:49:05.149Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
H78Ae68jGSnsp3sK18rQ5gzKhbDRcbErefQLZ3JwKUdi
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1359 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-09T21:49:04.791Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"881607ae-2103-4241-a152-d733b4f4f908","new_score":2,"page_slug":"kok-an-crown-resorts-anco-brothers","prev_score":2,"reason":"The reviewer examined 31 claims and found zero disputed. The computed disputed_pct of 9.7% consists entirely of three partially-supported claims: an incomplete executive order chain (claim_findings[1]) that omits EO 14306 and EO 14390 but is not factually wrong; an unverified specific birth date of July 7 (claim_findings[4]) where birth year and province are confirmed; and a contested GDP-comparison framing for the $19 billion scam-revenue figure (claim_findings[30]) that economists note is methodologically imprecise. All core allegations — the OFAC designation, the Thai enforcement campaign, the human trafficking conditions, the financial figures, and the political-connection characterizations — are confirmed against Tier 1 sources including Treasury, DOJ, Amnesty International, and FinCEN. No link rot or stale citations were detected. One high-priority coverage gap (current fugitive/Interpol status) is noted as a recommended expansion, not a reason to withhold approval.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}